Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Head and Neck

A modification of incisionless otoplasty for correcting the prominent ear deformity

Authors: Suheyl Haytoglu, Tahir Gokhan Haytoglu, Ilhami Yildirim, Osman Kursat Arikan

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

This article describes a modification of the incisionless otoplasty. We investigated the complication rates, recurrence risks, and patient satisfaction with this modified procedure. In total, 26 patients (49 ears) complaining of prominent ear were operated on. Auriculocephalic distances were measured at three different levels, pre-operatively, at the end of the surgery, and at 4 weeks and 6 months after surgery to evaluate the efficacy of the technique. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale and the global aesthetic improvement scale was applied by an independent non-participating plastic surgeon at 6 months after the surgery. The mean loss of medialization was ~1 mm at 4 weeks after surgery and 2 mm at 6 months after surgery for all levels. According to visual analog scale, patient or parent satisfaction increased significantly. The global aesthetic improvement scale rated the patients as 93.9 % “improved” and 6.1 % as “no change.” No rating was “worse.” There are many advantages of this technique. The operation is not time-consuming, does not require a dressing, and it can be performed in adults with local anesthesia under office conditions, with no need for hospitalization. After the operation, patients can return to their daily activities immediately. It is associated with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. This technique is a good option for otoplasty in patients with isolated, inadequate development of anti-helical ridge, and with soft auricular cartilage.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA (2005) Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:60–72CrossRef Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA (2005) Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:60–72CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Becker DG, Lai SS, Wise JB, Steiger JD (2006) Analysis in otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14:63–71CrossRefPubMed Becker DG, Lai SS, Wise JB, Steiger JD (2006) Analysis in otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14:63–71CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kalcioglu MT, Miman MC, Toplu Y, Yakinci C, Ozturan O (2003) Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:1169–1177CrossRefPubMed Kalcioglu MT, Miman MC, Toplu Y, Yakinci C, Ozturan O (2003) Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:1169–1177CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brucker MJ, Patel J, Sullivan PK (2003) A morphometric study of the external ear: age- and sex-related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:647–652CrossRefPubMed Brucker MJ, Patel J, Sullivan PK (2003) A morphometric study of the external ear: age- and sex-related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:647–652CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Macgregor FC (1978) Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg 5:347–350PubMed Macgregor FC (1978) Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg 5:347–350PubMed
8.
go back to reference Balogh B, Millesi H (1992) Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears? Plast Reconstr Surg 89:623–630CrossRefPubMed Balogh B, Millesi H (1992) Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears? Plast Reconstr Surg 89:623–630CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Maniglia AJ, Maniglia JV (1981) Congenital lop ear deformity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 14:83–93PubMed Maniglia AJ, Maniglia JV (1981) Congenital lop ear deformity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 14:83–93PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ely ET (1881) An operation for prominence of the auricles. Arch Otolaryngol 10:97–99 Ely ET (1881) An operation for prominence of the auricles. Arch Otolaryngol 10:97–99
11.
go back to reference Mustardé JC (1967) The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:382–386CrossRefPubMed Mustardé JC (1967) The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:382–386CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fritsch MH (2009) Incisionless otoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42:1199–1208CrossRef Fritsch MH (2009) Incisionless otoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42:1199–1208CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2013) Percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 24:398–404CrossRefPubMed Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2013) Percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 24:398–404CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Raunig H (2005) Antihelix plasty without modeling sutures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 7:334–341CrossRefPubMed Raunig H (2005) Antihelix plasty without modeling sutures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 7:334–341CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Richards SD, Jebreel A, Capper R (2005) Otoplasty: a review of the surgical technique. Clin Otolaryngol 30:2–8CrossRefPubMed Richards SD, Jebreel A, Capper R (2005) Otoplasty: a review of the surgical technique. Clin Otolaryngol 30:2–8CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nachlas NE (2002) Otoplasty. In: Papel ID (ed) Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 309–321 Nachlas NE (2002) Otoplasty. In: Papel ID (ed) Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 309–321
18.
go back to reference Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:19–27CrossRefPubMed Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:19–27CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tan KH (1986) Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg 39:270–273CrossRefPubMed Tan KH (1986) Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg 39:270–273CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Weerda H (2007) Surgery of the auricle: tumors-trauma-defects-abnormalities, 1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 153–154 Weerda H (2007) Surgery of the auricle: tumors-trauma-defects-abnormalities, 1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 153–154
21.
go back to reference Weerda H, Siegert R (1994) Complications in otoplastic surgery and their treatment. Facial Plast Surg 10:287–297CrossRefPubMed Weerda H, Siegert R (1994) Complications in otoplastic surgery and their treatment. Facial Plast Surg 10:287–297CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A modification of incisionless otoplasty for correcting the prominent ear deformity
Authors
Suheyl Haytoglu
Tahir Gokhan Haytoglu
Ilhami Yildirim
Osman Kursat Arikan
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3329-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2015 Go to the issue