Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: ‘fit for purpose? Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital’ (FLOURISH)

Authors: Frances Rapport, Emilie Francis-Auton, John Cartmill, Tayhla Ryder, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Robyn Clay-Williams

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Good workspace design is key to the quality of work, safety, and wellbeing for workers, yet we lack vital knowledge about optimal hospital design to meet healthcare workforce needs. This study used novel mobile methods to examine the concept of Work-as-Done and the effect of workspace-use on healthcare professional practice, productivity, health and safety in an Australian university hospital.

Methods

This pilot study took place in one gastroenterological surgical unit between 2018 and 2019. Data collection involved 50 h of observations and informal conversations, followed by interpretation of five architectural plans and 45 photographs. Fieldnotes were thematically analysed and corroborated by analysis of visual data using a predefined taxonomy.

Results

Six themes were identified, revealing spaces that both support and hinder Work-as-Done. Fit-for-purpose spaces facilitated effective communication between staff, patients and families, conferred relative comfort and privacy, and supported effective teamwork. Unfit-for-purpose spaces were characterised by disruptions to work practices, disharmony among team members, and physical discomfort for staff. Staff employed workarounds to manage unfit-for-purpose spaces.

Conclusion

The results identified negative impacts of negotiating unfit-for-purpose workspaces on the work and wellbeing of staff. While the use of workarounds and adaptations enable staff to maintain everyday working practices, they can also lead to unexpected consequences. Results indicated the need to identify and support fit-for-purpose spaces and minimize the detrimental qualities of unfit-for-purpose spaces. This study showed that mobile methods were suitable for examining Work-as-Done in a fast-moving, adaptive hospital setting.
Literature
1.
Lefebvre H. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991.
2.
Rapport F, Doel MA, Elwyn G. Snapshots and snippets: general practitioners’ reflections on professional space. Health Place. 2007;13(2):532–44.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, Wears RL. Resilient health care. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 2013.
4.
Wears RL, Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J. Resilient health care, volume 2: the resilience of everyday clinical work. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2015.
5.
Rapport F, Doel MA, Greaves D, Elwyn G. From manila to monitor: biographies of general practitioner workspaces. Health. 2006;10(2):233–51.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Cummins S, Curtis S, Diez-Roux AV, Macintyre S. Understanding and representing ‘place’ in health research: a relational approach. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(9):1825–38.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Rapport F, Doel MA, Jerzembek GS. “Convenient space” or “a tight squeeze”: insider views on the community pharmacy. Health Place. 2009;15(1):315–22.PubMedCrossRef
8.
OECD. Material resources, productivity and the environment: OECD Publishing; 2015.
9.
Gesler W, Bell M, Curtis S, Hubbard P, Francis S. Therapy by design: evaluating the UK hospital building program. Health Place. 2004;10(2):117–28.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Kearns RA, Barnett JR. Consumerist ideology and the symbolic landscapes of private medicine. Health Place. 1997;3(3):171–80.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Radley A, Taylor D. Images of recovery: a photo-elicitation study on the hospital ward. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(1):77–99.PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
14.
Vischer JC. Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: how people are affected by environments for work. Archit Sci Rev. 2008;51(2):97–108.CrossRef
15.
Wilson M, Dejoy D, Vandenberg R, Richardson H, Mcgrath A. Work characteristics and employee health and well-being: test of a model of healthy work organization. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2004;77(4):565–88.CrossRef
16.
Allen D, Weeks K, Moffitt K. Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: the moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(5):980.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Simpson JM, Oldenburg B, Owen N, Harris D, Dobbins T, Salmon A, et al. The Australian national workplace health project: design and baseline findings. Prev Med. 2000;31(3):249–60.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Vischer JC, Wifi M. The effect of workplace design on quality of life at work. Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. London: Springer; 2017.
19.
Gollop R, Whitby E, Buchanan D, Ketley D. Influencing sceptical staff to become supporters of service improvement: a qualitative study of doctors' and managers' views. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(2):108–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Braithwaite J, Wears R, Hollnagel E. Resilient health care: reconciling work-as-imagined and work-as-done. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2016.CrossRef
21.
Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R, Nugus P, Plumb J. Health care as a complex adaptive system. In: Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, Wears R, editors. Resilient health care. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2013.
22.
23.
24.
Kondro W. Medical errors increasing because of complexity of care and breakdown in doctor–patient relationship, physician consultant says. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(13):E645–E6.CrossRef
25.
Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1995;163(9):458–71.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353(353):i2139.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Braithwaite J, Hibbert PD, Jaffe A, White L, Cowell CT, Harris MF, et al. Quality of health care for children in Australia, 2012-2013. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1113–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Baigent M, Baigent R. Burnout in the medical profession: not a rite of passage. Med J Aust. 2018;208(11):471–2.PubMedCrossRef
30.
McPake B, Mahal A. Addressing the needs of an aging population in the health system: the Australian case. Health Syst Reform. 2017;3(3):236–47.PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
Büscher M, Urry J, Witchger K. Mobile methods. New York, USA: Routledge; 2010.CrossRef
33.
Rapport F, Auton E, Cartmill J, Braithwaite J, Shih P, Hodgen A, et al. Fit for purpose? OrganisationaL prOdUctivity and woRkforce wellbeIng in workSpaces in Hospital (FLOURISH): a multimethod qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9(e027636).PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
De Certeau M. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984.
35.
Fox N. Space, sterility and surgery: circuits of hygiene in the operating theatre. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(5):649–57.PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
Tantchou J. Blurring boundaries: structural constraints, space, tools, and agency in an operating theater. Sci Technol Human Values. 2014;39(3):336–73.CrossRef
38.
Willis J, Goad P, Lyon C, Pert A. Designing for wellbeing: realizing benefits for patients through best practice hospital design. Melbourne: Australian Research Council; 2011.
39.
Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm. Environ Plann A. 2006;38(2):207–26.CrossRef
40.
Rapport F, Braithwaite J. Are we on the cusp of a fourth research paradigm? Predicting the future for a new approach to methods-use in medical and health services research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1–7.CrossRef
41.
Czarniawska B. Shadowing and other techniques of doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press; 2007.
42.
Kusenbach M. Street phenomenology: the go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography. 2003;4(3):455–85.CrossRef
43.
44.
45.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd Edn ed: Sage Publications Ltd; 2005.
46.
Hogden A, Churruca K, Rapport F, Gillatt D. Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer. Health Expect. 2019.
47.
Emerson R, Fretz R, Shaw L. Writing ethnographic Fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2011.CrossRef
48.
Rapport F, Doel MA, Wainwright P. “The doctor’s tale”: enacted workspace and the general practitioner. Forum Qual Sozialforschung. 2008;9(2):1–15.
49.
Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. New York, US: Springer; 2013.
50.
Rapport F, Doel M, Hutchings H, Wright S, Wainwright P, John D, et al. Eleven themes of patient-centred professionalism in community pharmacy: innovative approaches to consulting. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;18:260–8.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Moore A, Butt D, Ellis-Clarke J, Cartmill J. Linguistic analysis of verbal and non-verbal communication in the operating room. Anz J Surg. 2010;80(12):925–9.PubMedCrossRef
52.
53.
54.
Carayon P. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. London, UK: CRC Press; 2006.CrossRef
55.
Robertson MM, Huang Y-H, O’Neill MJ, Schleifer LM. Flexible workspace design and ergonomics training: impacts on the psychosocial work environment, musculoskeletal health, and work effectiveness among knowledge workers. Appl Ergon. 2008;39(4):482–94.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Gharaveis A, Kirk Hamilton D, Shepley M, Pati D, Rodiek S. Design suggestions for greater teamwork, communication and security in hospital emergency departments. Indoor Built Environ 2019;0(0):1–14.
57.
Pati D, Harvey TE Jr, Pati S. Physical design correlates of efficiency and safety in emergency departments: a qualitative examination. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2014;37(3):299–316.PubMedCrossRef
58.
59.
Dean M, Gill R, Barbour JB. “Let’s sit forward”: investigating interprofessional communication, collaboration, professional roles, and physical space at EmergiCare. Health Commun. 2016;31(12):1506–16.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Parker L. Rituals versus risks in the contemporary operating theatre environment. NATnews. 1999;9(8):341–5.PubMed
61.
Ford J, Henderson R, O'Hare D. Barriers to intra-aircraft communication and safety: the perspective of the flight attendants. Int J Aviat Psychol. 2013;23(4):368–87.CrossRef
62.
Ashcraft KL. Appreciating the ‘work’of discourse: occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots. Discourse Commun. 2007;1(1):9–36.CrossRef
63.
Brown B, Crawford P, Nerlich B, Koteyko N. The habitus of hygiene: discourses of cleanliness and infection control in nursing work. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(7):1047–55.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Brown G, Zhu H. ‘My workspace, not yours’: the impact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizations. J Environ Psychol. 2016;48:54–64.CrossRef
65.
Laurence GA, Fried Y, Slowik LH. “My space”: a moderated mediation model of the effect of architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work. J Environ Psychol. 2013;36:144–52.CrossRef
66.
Halford S, Leonard P. Space and place in the construction and performance of gendered nursing identities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(2):201–8.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Nordquist J, Sundberg K, Kitto S, Ygge J, Reeves S. Future learning environments: the advent of a “spatial turn”? J Interprof Care. 2013;27(sup2):77–81.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Carthey J. Reinterpreting the hospital corridor:“wasted space” or essential for quality multidisciplinary clinical care? HERD. 2008;2(1):17–29.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Bång M, Timpka T. Cognitive tools in medical teamwork: the spatial arrangement of patient records. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):331–6.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Marshall S. The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(5):1162–71.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Din R, Jena D, Muddu BN, Jennna D. The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(5):319.PubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Rogers BA, Pleat J. Is there adequate information on operation notes? The application of the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. J Perioper Pract. 2010;20(9):339–42.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Stevens M The operating room. In: Roy M-C, editor. Guide to infection control in the hospital: International Society of Infectious Diseases; 2018.
74.
Vischer JC. The effects of the physical environment on job performance: towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress Health. 2007;23(3):175–84.CrossRef
75.
Braithwaite J, Wears RL, Hollnagel E. Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(5):418–20.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Rapport F, Clay-Williams R, Churruca K, Shih P, Hogden A, Braithwaite J. The struggle of translating science into action. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):117–26.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: ‘fit for purpose? Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital’ (FLOURISH)
Authors
Frances Rapport
Emilie Francis-Auton
John Cartmill
Tayhla Ryder
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Robyn Clay-Williams
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4938-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Health Services Research 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research article

High cost or frequent attender – both spend resources, but are they linked to work disability? A cohort study from occupational health primary care in Finland

Research article

The potential role of patent and proprietary medicine vendors’ associations in improving the quality of services in Nigeria’s drug shops

Research article

Confidence, attitudes, beliefs and determinants of implementation behaviours among physiotherapists towards clinical management of low back pain before and after implementation of the BetterBack model of care

Research article

The influence of mobile phone-based health reminders on patient adherence to medications and healthy lifestyle recommendations for effective management of diabetes type 2: a randomized control trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Research article

Chronic patients’ satisfaction and priorities regarding medical care, information and services and quality of life: a French online patient community survey

Research article

Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review