Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Research Article

A method to detect progression of glaucoma using the multifocal visual evoked potential technique

Authors: Boonchai Wangsupadilok, Vivienne C. Greenstein, Fabio N. Kanadani, Tomas M. Grippo, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Donald C. Hood

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To describe a method for monitoring progression of glaucoma using the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique. Methods Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma were divided into two groups. Group I, comprised 43 patients who had a repeat mfVEP test within 50 days (mean 0.9 ± 0.5 months), and group II, 44 patients who had a repeat test after at least 6 months (mean 20.7 ± 9.7 months). Monocular mfVEPs were obtained using a 60-sector pattern reversal dartboard display. Monocular and interocular analyses were performed. Data from the two visits were compared. The total number of abnormal test points with P < 5% within the visual field (total scores) and number of abnormal test points within a cluster (cluster size) were calculated. Data for group I provided a measure of test–retest variability independent of disease progression. Data for group II provided a possible measure of progression. Results The difference in the total scores for group II between visit 1 and visit 2 for the interocular and monocular comparison was significant (P < 0.05) as was the difference in cluster size for the interocular comparison (P < 0.05). Group I did not show a significant change in either total score or cluster size. Conclusion The change in the total score and cluster size over time provides a possible method for assessing progression of glaucoma with the mfVEP technique.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP (2001) Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1492–1499PubMed Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP (2001) Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1492–1499PubMed
4.
go back to reference Boehm MD, Nedrud C, Greenfield DS, Chen PP (2003) Scanning laser polarimetry and detection of progression after optic disc hemorrhage in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 121:189–194PubMed Boehm MD, Nedrud C, Greenfield DS, Chen PP (2003) Scanning laser polarimetry and detection of progression after optic disc hemorrhage in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 121:189–194PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B (2006) Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:654–662PubMedCrossRef Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B (2006) Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:654–662PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Philippin H, Unsoeld A, Maier P, Walter S, Bach M, Funk J (2006) Ten-year results: detection of long-term progressive optic disc changes with confocal laser tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:670–674. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0094-4 PubMedCrossRef Philippin H, Unsoeld A, Maier P, Walter S, Bach M, Funk J (2006) Ten-year results: detection of long-term progressive optic disc changes with confocal laser tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:670–674. doi:10.​1007/​s00417-005-0094-4 PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR (1982) Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 100:135–146PubMed Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR (1982) Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 100:135–146PubMed
9.
go back to reference Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR (1989) Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 107:453–464PubMed Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR (1989) Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 107:453–464PubMed
10.
go back to reference Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D, Sommer A (1992) An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 99:19–28PubMed Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D, Sommer A (1992) An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 99:19–28PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS (2000) Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:741–748PubMed Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS (2000) Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:741–748PubMed
12.
go back to reference Werner EB, Petrig B, Krupin T, Bishop KI (1989) Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1083–1089PubMed Werner EB, Petrig B, Krupin T, Bishop KI (1989) Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1083–1089PubMed
13.
go back to reference Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (1994) 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 101:1445–1455 Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (1994) 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 101:1445–1455
19.
go back to reference Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM et al (2000) An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1580–1587PubMed Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM et al (2000) An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1580–1587PubMed
22.
go back to reference Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA (2000) Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9:10–19PubMed Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA (2000) Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9:10–19PubMed
24.
go back to reference Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Winn BJ, Ohri N, Liebmann JM et al (2004) Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:492–498. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0602 PubMedCrossRef Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Winn BJ, Ohri N, Liebmann JM et al (2004) Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:492–498. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​03-0602 PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
32.
go back to reference Chauhan BC, Johnson CA (1999) Test–retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:648–656PubMed Chauhan BC, Johnson CA (1999) Test–retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:648–656PubMed
33.
go back to reference Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA (1999) Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1152–1161PubMed Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA (1999) Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1152–1161PubMed
34.
go back to reference Wild JM, Pacey IE, O’Neill EC, Cunliffe IA (1999) The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1998–2009PubMed Wild JM, Pacey IE, O’Neill EC, Cunliffe IA (1999) The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1998–2009PubMed
37.
go back to reference Zhang X, Hood DC (2004) Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method. Doc Ophthalmol 108:211–222. doi:10.1007/s10633-004-5323-3 PubMedCrossRef Zhang X, Hood DC (2004) Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method. Doc Ophthalmol 108:211–222. doi:10.​1007/​s10633-004-5323-3 PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bjerre A, Grigg JR, Parry NR, Henson DB (2004) Test–retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:4035–4040. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0099 PubMedCrossRef Bjerre A, Grigg JR, Parry NR, Henson DB (2004) Test–retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:4035–4040. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​04-0099 PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, Zhang X, Ritch R, Liebmann JM et al (2002) Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1672–1681PubMed Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, Zhang X, Ritch R, Liebmann JM et al (2002) Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1672–1681PubMed
Metadata
Title
A method to detect progression of glaucoma using the multifocal visual evoked potential technique
Authors
Boonchai Wangsupadilok
Vivienne C. Greenstein
Fabio N. Kanadani
Tomas M. Grippo
Jeffrey M. Liebmann
Robert Ritch
Donald C. Hood
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-008-9149-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2009 Go to the issue