Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

A longitudinal study on determinants of the intention to start smoking among Non-smoking boys and girls of high and low socioeconomic status

Authors: Henricus-Paul Cremers, Liesbeth Mercken, Hein de Vries, Anke Oenema

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study identifies differences in socio-cognitive factors as they relate to the intention to smoke among boys and girls living in high socioeconomic status (HSES) and low socioeconomic status (LSES) neighborhoods.

Methods

A total of 1,643 children (aged 10–12 years) completed a web-based questionnaire assessing their intention, attitude, social influences, and self-efficacy toward smoking at baseline and at one year follow-up. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relations between intention and predictor variables (i.e. attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy). Three-way interaction terms were added to the first analysis to examine potential interactions of gender, socioeconomic status and predictor variables. A 3-way interaction effect was present, and therefore subgroup analyses for HSES and LSES boys and girls were warranted.

Results

The results indicated that positive attitudes toward smoking were related to the intention to smoke among HSES boys, whereas HSES girls had higher intentions to smoke if they perceived fewer disadvantages of smoking (OR: 0.42; 95 % CI: 0.22–0.82). The intention to smoke among LSES boys was predicted by perceived social norms (OR: 0.49; 95 % CI: 0.25–0.93); in LSES girls, the smoking behavior of people in their environment was most strongly related to their smoking intention (OR: 5.55; 95 % CI: 2.81–10.93).

Conclusions

To prevent youth smoking, HSES boys and girls may benefit from interventions that address attitudes. Boys from an LSES neighborhood may profit from smoking prevention interventions that target social norms, while LSES girls may benefit from strategies aimed at resisting the influence of smokers in their environment.

Trial registration

The ‘Fun without Smokes’ study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Atrium-Orbis-Zuyd Hospital (NL32093.096.11/MEC 11-T-25) and registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR3116).
Literature
1.
STIVORO. Vallen en opstaan. Jaarverslag 2012 [Trial and error. Annual report 2012]. Den Haag: Stichting Volksgezondheid en Roken [Dutch Foundation on Smoking and Health]; 2013.
2.
Côté F, Godin G, Gagne C. Identification of factors promoting abstinence from smoking in a cohort of elementary schoolchildren. Prev Med. 2004;39(4):695–703.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Crone MR, Spruijt R, Dijkstra NS, Willemsen MC, Paulussen TG. Does a smoking prevention program in elementary schools prepare children for secondary school? Prev Med. 2011;52(1):53–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4, CD001293.
5.
Thomas RE, Baker P, Lorenzetti D. Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;1, CD004493.
6.
de Vries H. Socio-economic differences in smoking: Dutch adolescents' beliefs and behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(3):419–24.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Conrad KM, Flay BR, Hill D. Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. Br J Addict. 1992;87(12):1711–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Flay BR, Hu FB, Richardson J. Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Prev Med. 1998;27(5 Pt 3):A9–18.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hoving C, Reubsaet A, de Vries H. Predictors of smoking stage transitions for adolescent boys and girls. Prev Med. 2007;44(6):485–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Harrell JS, Bangdiwala SI, Deng S, Webb JP, Bradley C. Smoking initiation in youth: the roles of gender, race, socioeconomics, and developmental status. J Adolesc Health. 1998;23(5):271–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Wiium N, Breivik K, Wold B. The Relationship between Smoker Role Models and Intentions to Smoke among Adolescents. J Youth Adolescence. 2006;35(4):551–62.CrossRef
12.
Cremers HP, Oenema A, Mercken L, Candel M, de Vries H. Explaining socio-economic differences in intention to smoke among primary school children. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafo M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107–23.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bhatia S, Hendricks S, Bhatia S. Attitudes Toward and Beliefs About Smoking in Grade School Children. Subst Use Misuse. 1993;28(3):271–80.
15.
Hampson SE, Andrews JA, Barckley M. Predictors of the development of elementary-school children's intentions to smoke cigarettes: hostility, prototypes, and subjective norms. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(7):751–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Crone MR, Reijneveld SA, Willemsen MC, van Leerdam FJ, Spruijt RD, Sing RA. Prevention of smoking in adolescents with lower education: a school based intervention study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(9):675–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Madarasova Geckova A, Stewart R, van Dijk JP, Orosova O, Groothoff JW, Post D. Influence of socio-economic status, parents and peers on smoking behaviour of adolescents. Eur Addict Res. 2005;11(4):204–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Tjora T, Hetland J, Aaro LE, Overland S. Distal and proximal family predictors of adolescents' smoking initiation and development: a longitudinal latent curve model analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:911.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Chung W, Lim S, Lee S. Factors influencing gender differences in smoking and their separate contributions: evidence from South Korea. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(12):1966–73.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kilic D, Ozturk S. Gender differences in cigarette consumption in Turkey: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Health Policy. 2013;114(2-3):207–14.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Urberg K, Robbins RL. Adolescents' perceptions of the costs and benefits associated with cigarette smoking: Sex differences and peer influence. J Youth Adolescence. 1981;10(5):353–61.CrossRef
22.
Okoli C, Greaves L, Fagyas V. Sex differences in smoking initiation among children and adolescents. Public Health. 2013;127(1):3–10.CrossRefPubMed
23.
de Vries H, Mudde A, Leijs I, Charlton A, Vartiainen E, Buijs G, et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res. 2003;18(5):611–26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Pitel L, Geckova AM, van Dijk JP, Reijneveld SA. Gender differences in adolescent health-related behaviour diminished between 1998 and 2006. Public Health. 2010;124(9):512–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Potter BK, Pederson LL, Chan SS, Aubut JA, Koval JJ. Does a relationship exist between body weight, concerns about weight, and smoking among adolescents? An integration of the literature with an emphasis on gender. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(3):397–425.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Chassin L, Presson C, Montello D, Sherman S, McGrew J. Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: longitudintal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation. Dev Psychol. 1986;22(3):327–34.CrossRef
27.
Simons-Morton B, Crump AD, Haynie DL, Saylor KE, Eitel P, Yu K. Psychosocial, school, and parent factors associated with recent smoking among early-adolescent boys and girls. Prev Med. 1999;28(2):138–48.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Charlton A, Blair V. Predicting the onset of smoking in boys and girls. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(7):813–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Cremers HP, Mercken L, Oenema A, de Vries H. A web-based computer-tailored smoking prevention programme for primary school children: intervention design and study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Ausems M, Mesters I, van Breukelen G, de Vries H. Short-term effects of a randomized computer-based out-of-school smoking prevention trial aimed at elementary schoolchildren. Prev Med. 2002;34(6):581–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ausems M, Mesters I, van Breukelen G, de Vries H. Effects of in-school and tailored out-of-school smoking prevention among Dutch vocational school students. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(1):51–63.CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Knol FA, Boelhouwer J, Veldheer V. Statusontwikkeling van wijken in Nederland 1998-2010 [Status development of districts in the Netherlands 1998-2010]. Den Haag: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research; 2012. p. 1–97.
35.
Keij I. Standaarddefinitie allochtonen [Standard definition Immigrants]. In: Hoe doet het CBS dat nu? [How does Statistics Netherlands do this?]. 10th ed. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands; 2000. p. 24–5.
36.
de Vries H, Kremers SP, Smeets T, Brug J, Eijmael K. The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22(6):417–25.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Field AP. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: Sage; 2009.
38.
Haustein KO. Smoking and poverty. Eur J Cardiov Prev R. 2006;13(3):312–8.CrossRef
39.
Chen E, Matthews KA, Boyce WT. Socioeconomic differences in children's health: how and why do these relationships change with age? Psychol Bull. 2002;128(2):295–329.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Norman GJ, Ribisl KM, Howard-Pitney B, Howard KA. Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them? Prev Med. 1999;29(6 Pt 1):581–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Hu FB, Flay BR, Hedeker D, Siddiqui O, Day LE. The Influences of Friends' and Parental Smoking on Adolescent Smoking Behavior: The Effects of Time and Prior Smoking. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1995;25(22):2018–47.CrossRef
42.
Flay BR, Hu FB, Siddiqui O, Day LE, Hedeker D, Petraitis J, et al. Differential influence of parental smoking and friends' smoking on adolescent initiation and escalation of smoking. J Health Soc Behav. 1994;35(3):248–65.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Mercken L, Snijders TA, Steglich C, Vertiainen E, de Vries H. Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: a social network analysis of adolescent smoking. Addiction. 2010;105(7):1280–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Urberg KA, Cheng CH, Shyu SJ. Grade changes in peer influence on adolescent cigarette smoking: a comparison of two measures. Addict Behav. 1991;16(1-2):21–8.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, van Empelen P, Brug J. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(1):85–98.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
De Josselin De Jong S, Candel M, Segaar D, Cremers HP, De Vries H. Efficacy of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Smoking Prevention Intervention for Dutch Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernández ME. Planning health promotion programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
49.
Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27(3):379–87.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A longitudinal study on determinants of the intention to start smoking among Non-smoking boys and girls of high and low socioeconomic status
Authors
Henricus-Paul Cremers
Liesbeth Mercken
Hein de Vries
Anke Oenema
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1917-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Health and ageing in Nairobi’s informal settlements-evidence from the International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health (INDEPTH): a cross sectional study

Study protocol

A web- and mobile phone-based intervention to prevent obesity in 4-year-olds (MINISTOP): a population-based randomized controlled trial

Research article

Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study

Research article

Vaccination Week in the Americas, 2011: an opportunity to assess the routine vaccination program in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Research article

Perceptions of Sudanese women of reproductive age toward HIV/AIDS and services for Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV

Research article

Understanding the complex determinants of height and adiposity in disadvantaged daycare preschoolers in Salvador, NE Brazil through structural equation modelling