Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Article

A longitudinal study of changes in provider–patient interaction in treatment of localized prostate cancer

Authors: Nicole Ernstmann, Oliver Ommen, Christoph Kowalski, Melanie Neumann, Adriaan Visser, Holger Pfaff, Lothar Weissbach

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Whilst much is known as to the met and unmet communication needs of prostate cancer patients, few studies have been conducted on the changes in communication between provider and patient over time. Therefore, the aim of our study is to examine (a) whether there are changes over time in the quality of psychosocial care in long-term treatment of localized prostate cancer and (b) whether those changes are associated with the treatment decision.

Methods

HAROW is a prospective, observational study designed to collect clinical data and patient reported outcomes (PROs) of different treatment options (hormonal therapy, active surveillance, radiation, operation, watchful waiting) for newly diagnosed patients with localized prostate cancer under real conditions. At 6-month intervals, general clinical data, PROs (e.g. quality of life, quality of physician–patient interaction) and individual costs are documented. We analysed data of N = 1,216 patients at the time of initial diagnosis (T1) and after 6 months (T2).

Results

There is a significant decline in shared decision-making behaviour of physicians for the group of patients undergoing a prostatectomy and for the hormonal therapy group at the time of initial diagnosis and after 6 months. In terms of emotional support by physicians, there is a significant difference between the treatment groups at the time of initial diagnosis with patients undergoing a prostatectomy reporting significantly less support than the hormonal therapy group.

Conclusion

Future research from both, the providers’ and the patients’ perspective, will have to clarify if we can interpret our results as change in the communication behaviour once the treatment decision for prostatectomy or hormonal therapy is made.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bisson JI, Chubb HL, Bennett S, Mason M, Jones D, Kynaston H (2002) The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 90:56–61PubMedCrossRef Bisson JI, Chubb HL, Bennett S, Mason M, Jones D, Kynaston H (2002) The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 90:56–61PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2004) Prospective study of men’s psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology 63:751–756PubMedCrossRef Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2004) Prospective study of men’s psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology 63:751–756PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Perez MA, Skinner EC, Meyerowitz BE (2002) Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol 21:288–293PubMedCrossRef Perez MA, Skinner EC, Meyerowitz BE (2002) Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol 21:288–293PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer S, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Pfaff H (2009) Analyzing the “nature” and “specific effectiveness” of clinical empathy: a theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns 74:339–346PubMedCrossRef Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer S, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Pfaff H (2009) Analyzing the “nature” and “specific effectiveness” of clinical empathy: a theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns 74:339–346PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H (2007) Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns 69:63–75PubMedCrossRef Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H (2007) Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns 69:63–75PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coulehan JL, Platt FW, Egener B, Frankel R, Lin CT, Lown B et al (2001) “Let me see if I have this right…”: words that help build empathy. Ann Intern Med 135:221–227PubMed Coulehan JL, Platt FW, Egener B, Frankel R, Lin CT, Lown B et al (2001) “Let me see if I have this right…”: words that help build empathy. Ann Intern Med 135:221–227PubMed
7.
go back to reference Squier RW (1990) A model of empathic understanding and adherence to treatment regimens in practitioner–patient relationships. Soc Sci Med 30:325–339PubMedCrossRef Squier RW (1990) A model of empathic understanding and adherence to treatment regimens in practitioner–patient relationships. Soc Sci Med 30:325–339PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maguire P, Faulkner A, Booth K, Elliott C, Hillier V (1996) Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. Eur J Cancer 32A:78–81PubMedCrossRef Maguire P, Faulkner A, Booth K, Elliott C, Hillier V (1996) Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. Eur J Cancer 32A:78–81PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beckman HB, Frankel RM (2003) Training practitioners to communicate effectively in cancer care: it is the relationship that counts. Patient Educ Couns 50:85–89PubMedCrossRef Beckman HB, Frankel RM (2003) Training practitioners to communicate effectively in cancer care: it is the relationship that counts. Patient Educ Couns 50:85–89PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference De Haes H, Bensing J (2009) Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74:287–294PubMedCrossRef De Haes H, Bensing J (2009) Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74:287–294PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA (2005) The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 14:831–845PubMedCrossRef Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA (2005) The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 14:831–845PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Hayter C, Groome P, Nickel JC, Downes H et al (2000) What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Mak 20:7–19CrossRef Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Hayter C, Groome P, Nickel JC, Downes H et al (2000) What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Mak 20:7–19CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S Brundage, Michael D, Siemens DR (2009) Overall information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients over a decade: highly variable and remarkably stable. Support Care Cancer 17:429–435PubMedCrossRef Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S Brundage, Michael D, Siemens DR (2009) Overall information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients over a decade: highly variable and remarkably stable. Support Care Cancer 17:429–435PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Offord KP, Koch C, Wen KY (2003) Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns 49:233–242PubMedCrossRef Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Offord KP, Koch C, Wen KY (2003) Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns 49:233–242PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL (2004) Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision making. BJU Int 93:47–51PubMedCrossRef Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL (2004) Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision making. BJU Int 93:47–51PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Holmboe ES, Concato J (2000) Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: asking men what’s important. J Gen Intern Med 15:694–701PubMedCrossRef Holmboe ES, Concato J (2000) Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: asking men what’s important. J Gen Intern Med 15:694–701PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2002) Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 89:255–260PubMedCrossRef Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2002) Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 89:255–260PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mazur DJ, Hickam DH (1996) Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer. West J Med 165:26–30PubMed Mazur DJ, Hickam DH (1996) Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer. West J Med 165:26–30PubMed
19.
go back to reference Van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Stalmeier PFM, van Lin ENJT, Schimmel EC, Huizenga H, van Daal WAJ et al (2006) Do prostate cancer patients want to choose their own radiation treatment? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:1105–1111PubMedCrossRef Van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Stalmeier PFM, van Lin ENJT, Schimmel EC, Huizenga H, van Daal WAJ et al (2006) Do prostate cancer patients want to choose their own radiation treatment? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:1105–1111PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sharpley CF, Christie DRH (2007) Patient information preferences among breast and prostate cancer patients. Australas Radiol 51:154–158PubMedCrossRef Sharpley CF, Christie DRH (2007) Patient information preferences among breast and prostate cancer patients. Australas Radiol 51:154–158PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steginga K, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA, Heathcote P, Yaxley J (2001) The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000). Psychooncology 10:66–75PubMedCrossRef Steginga K, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA, Heathcote P, Yaxley J (2001) The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000). Psychooncology 10:66–75PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, Norman A, Eeles R, Huddart R et al (2003) Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: survey from a nonsurgical oncology clinic. Psychooncology 12:769–783PubMedCrossRef Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, Norman A, Eeles R, Huddart R et al (2003) Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: survey from a nonsurgical oncology clinic. Psychooncology 12:769–783PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shapiro P, Coyne J, Kruss L, Palmers SC, Vaugh DJ, Malkowicz B (2004) Interest in services among prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Psychooncology 13:512–525PubMedCrossRef Shapiro P, Coyne J, Kruss L, Palmers SC, Vaugh DJ, Malkowicz B (2004) Interest in services among prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Psychooncology 13:512–525PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Voerman B, Visser A, Fischer M, Garssen B, van Andel G, Bensing J (2007) Determinants of participation in social support groups for prostate cancer patients. Psychooncology 16:1092–1099PubMedCrossRef Voerman B, Visser A, Fischer M, Garssen B, van Andel G, Bensing J (2007) Determinants of participation in social support groups for prostate cancer patients. Psychooncology 16:1092–1099PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL et al (2005) Measuring patient-centered communication in patient–physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 61:1516–1538PubMedCrossRef Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL et al (2005) Measuring patient-centered communication in patient–physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 61:1516–1538PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ommen O, Wirtz M, Janssen C, Neumann M, Driller E, Ernstmann N et al (2009) Psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess patient-reported ‘psychosocial care by physicians’: a structural equation modeling approach. Int J Qual Health Care 21:190–197PubMedCrossRef Ommen O, Wirtz M, Janssen C, Neumann M, Driller E, Ernstmann N et al (2009) Psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess patient-reported ‘psychosocial care by physicians’: a structural equation modeling approach. Int J Qual Health Care 21:190–197PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ommen O, Wirtz M, Janssen C, Neumann M, Ernstmann N, Pfaff H (2010) Validation of a theory-based instrument measuring patient-reported psychosocial care by physicians using a multiple indicators and multiple causes model. Patient Educ Couns 80:100–106PubMedCrossRef Ommen O, Wirtz M, Janssen C, Neumann M, Ernstmann N, Pfaff H (2010) Validation of a theory-based instrument measuring patient-reported psychosocial care by physicians using a multiple indicators and multiple causes model. Patient Educ Couns 80:100–106PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Crawford ED, Bennett CL, Stone NN, Knight SJ, DeAntoni E, Sharp L et al (1997) Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data. Urology 50:366–372PubMedCrossRef Crawford ED, Bennett CL, Stone NN, Knight SJ, DeAntoni E, Sharp L et al (1997) Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data. Urology 50:366–372PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gray RE, Klotz LH, Iscoe NA, Fitch MI, Franssen E, Johnson BJ et al (1997) Prostate cancer patients’ satisfaction with medical information. Can J Urol 4:83–87PubMed Gray RE, Klotz LH, Iscoe NA, Fitch MI, Franssen E, Johnson BJ et al (1997) Prostate cancer patients’ satisfaction with medical information. Can J Urol 4:83–87PubMed
30.
go back to reference Moore KN, Estey A (1999) The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J Adv Nurs 29:1121–1129PubMedCrossRef Moore KN, Estey A (1999) The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J Adv Nurs 29:1121–1129PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A longitudinal study of changes in provider–patient interaction in treatment of localized prostate cancer
Authors
Nicole Ernstmann
Oliver Ommen
Christoph Kowalski
Melanie Neumann
Adriaan Visser
Holger Pfaff
Lothar Weissbach
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1151-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine