Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 3/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016 | Commentary

A hundred years of basic science in medical education

Authors: Matt Sibbald, Alan Neville

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

For a century, we have been trying to integrate basic science into medical education, beginning with the Flexner report. Flexner, a high school teacher, an outsider to the practice of medicine and medical education, was commissioned to re-evaluate the medical education system [1]. He was chosen for his expertise as an educator, having critiqued the American schooling system and having explored pedagogical techniques. The for-profit, disjointed, non-standardized North American system was losing the respect of the public. Flexner laid the groundwork for a marriage between professors of university science and physician trainers in clinical arts. Flexner’s suggested curriculum with two years of laboratory-based science followed by clinical training was modelled after a system already in place at Hopkins, itself an import from Germany credited to William Welch. The revolution of medical education, spurred by the Flexner report, instilled scientific rigour into medical education curricula. Instruction by physician scientists even became a quality indicator [1]. This transition of medical education from the for-profit sector to the university setting was accomplished through the integration of basic science. Basic science was a tool to gain public trust through academic rigour. Basic science became an aid to protect and preserve professional autonomy. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Duffy TP. The Flexner Report – 100 Years Later. Yale J Biol Med. 2011;84:269–76. Duffy TP. The Flexner Report – 100 Years Later. Yale J Biol Med. 2011;84:269–76.
2.
go back to reference Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1980. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1980.
3.
go back to reference Papa FJ, Harasym PH. Medical curriculum reform in North America, 1765 to the present: a cognitive science perspective. Acad Med. 1999;74:154–64.CrossRef Papa FJ, Harasym PH. Medical curriculum reform in North America, 1765 to the present: a cognitive science perspective. Acad Med. 1999;74:154–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Neville AJ, Norman GR. PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. Acad Med. 2007;82:370–4.CrossRef Neville AJ, Norman GR. PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. Acad Med. 2007;82:370–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smits PBA, Verbeek JHAM, De Buisonje CD. Problem based learning in continuing medical education: a review of controlled evaluation studies. BMJ. 2002;324:153–6.CrossRef Smits PBA, Verbeek JHAM, De Buisonje CD. Problem based learning in continuing medical education: a review of controlled evaluation studies. BMJ. 2002;324:153–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eisenstaedt RS, Barry W, Glanz K. Problem-based learning: cognitive retention and cohort traits of randomly selected participants and decliners. Acad Med. 1990;65:11–2.CrossRef Eisenstaedt RS, Barry W, Glanz K. Problem-based learning: cognitive retention and cohort traits of randomly selected participants and decliners. Acad Med. 1990;65:11–2.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hodges BD, Albert M, Arweiler D, et al. The future of medical education: a Canadian environmental scan. Med Teach. 2011;45:95–106. Hodges BD, Albert M, Arweiler D, et al. The future of medical education: a Canadian environmental scan. Med Teach. 2011;45:95–106.
8.
go back to reference Bandiera G, Boucher A, Neville A, Kuper A, Hodges B. Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Med Teach. 2013;35:381–7.CrossRef Bandiera G, Boucher A, Neville A, Kuper A, Hodges B. Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Med Teach. 2013;35:381–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lisk K, Agur A, Woods N. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40037-016-0268-2. Lisk K, Agur A, Woods N. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40037-016-0268-2.
10.
go back to reference Boshuizen H, Schmidt HG. On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cogn Sci. 1992;16:153–84.CrossRef Boshuizen H, Schmidt HG. On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cogn Sci. 1992;16:153–84.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A hundred years of basic science in medical education
Authors
Matt Sibbald
Alan Neville
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0269-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Perspectives on Medical Education 3/2016 Go to the issue