Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2023

16-05-2023 | REVIEW

A guide to appropriately planning and conducting meta-analyses: part 3. Special considerations—the network meta-analysis

Authors: Kyle N. Kunze, Jeffrey Kay, Ayoosh Pareek, Jari Dahmen, Jorge Chahla, Shane J. Nho, Riley J. Williams III, Darren de Sa, Jon Karlsson

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

The meta-analysis has become one of the predominant studies designs in orthopaedic literature. Within recent years, the network meta-analysis has been implicated as a powerful approach to comparing multiple treatments for an outcome of interest when conducting a meta-analysis (as opposed to two competing treatments which is typical of a traditional meta-analysis). With the increasing use of the network meta-analysis, it is imperative for readers to possess the ability to independently and critically evaluate these types of studies. The purpose of this article is to provide the necessary foundation of knowledge to both properly conduct and interpret the results of a network meta-analysis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Amer MA, Smith MD, Herbison GP, McCall JL (2020) Network meta-analysis: what it is and why you should know. ANZ J Surg 90:954–956CrossRefPubMed Amer MA, Smith MD, Herbison GP, McCall JL (2020) Network meta-analysis: what it is and why you should know. ANZ J Surg 90:954–956CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL (2020) Comparison of treatments for frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2029581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL (2020) Comparison of treatments for frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2029581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kunze KN, Polce EM, Lilly DT, Garcia FL, Cohn MR, Nho SJ et al (2020) Adjunct analgesia reduces pain and opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 48:3638–3651CrossRefPubMed Kunze KN, Polce EM, Lilly DT, Garcia FL, Cohn MR, Nho SJ et al (2020) Adjunct analgesia reduces pain and opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 48:3638–3651CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lameire DL, Khalik HA, Phillips M, MacDonald AE, Banfield L, de Sa D et al (2022) Thromboprophylaxis after knee arthroscopy does not decrease the risk of deep vein thrombosis: a network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:2364–2376CrossRefPubMed Lameire DL, Khalik HA, Phillips M, MacDonald AE, Banfield L, de Sa D et al (2022) Thromboprophylaxis after knee arthroscopy does not decrease the risk of deep vein thrombosis: a network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:2364–2376CrossRefPubMed
7.
12.
go back to reference Seide SE, Jensen K, Kieser M (2020) A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data. Res Synthe Methods 11:363–378CrossRef Seide SE, Jensen K, Kieser M (2020) A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data. Res Synthe Methods 11:363–378CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senn S, Gavini F, Magrez D, Scheen A (2013) Issues in performing a network meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 22:169–189CrossRefPubMed Senn S, Gavini F, Magrez D, Scheen A (2013) Issues in performing a network meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 22:169–189CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Singh H, Knapik DM, Polce EM, Eikani CK, Bjornstad AH, Gursoy S et al (2022) Relative efficacy of intra-articular injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 50:3140–3148CrossRefPubMed Singh H, Knapik DM, Polce EM, Eikani CK, Bjornstad AH, Gursoy S et al (2022) Relative efficacy of intra-articular injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 50:3140–3148CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tian J, Gao Y, Zhang J, Yang Z, Dong S, Zhang T et al (2021) Progress and challenges of network meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 14:218–231CrossRefPubMed Tian J, Gao Y, Zhang J, Yang Z, Dong S, Zhang T et al (2021) Progress and challenges of network meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 14:218–231CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yang A, Pechlivanoglou P, Aoyama K (2022) Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians. J Anesth 36:524–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang A, Pechlivanoglou P, Aoyama K (2022) Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians. J Anesth 36:524–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A guide to appropriately planning and conducting meta-analyses: part 3. Special considerations—the network meta-analysis
Authors
Kyle N. Kunze
Jeffrey Kay
Ayoosh Pareek
Jari Dahmen
Jorge Chahla
Shane J. Nho
Riley J. Williams III
Darren de Sa
Jon Karlsson
Publication date
16-05-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07419-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2023

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2023 Go to the issue