Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Editorials

A Follow-Up Report Card on Computer-Assisted Diagnosis—the Grade: C+

Authors: Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP, C. William Hanson, MD, III

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Excerpt

Diagnostic errors result in an estimated 40,000 to 80,000 US hospital deaths annually1; they are the most common type of medical error cited in malpractice claims and result in the largest payouts2; they lead to more patient readmissions than other types of errors3; and autopsy studies confirm the ubiquity of missed diagnoses.4 Although not all diagnostic errors result in harm, many do.5 Typically these mistakes represent either cognitive errors, such as those resulting from a lack of knowledge, or communication errors, such as those resulting from poor handoffs and follow-up.6,7 Differential diagnosis (DDX) generators have the potential to assist in the former, while other types of clinical decision support can address the latter. …
Literature
1.
Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ. Diagnostic errors–the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA. 2009;301(10):1060–1062.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Singh H, Naik AD, Rao R, Petersen LA. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):489–494.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zwaan L, de Bruijne M, Wagner C, Thijs A, Smits M, van der Wal G, et al. Patient record review of the incidence, consequences, and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1015–1021.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2849–2856.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Pronovost PJ, Colantuoni E. Measuring preventable harm: helping science keep pace with policy. JAMA. 2009;301(12):1273–1275.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(7):488–496.PubMed
7.
Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493–1499.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Bond WF, Schwartz LM, Weaver KR, Levick D, Giuliano M, Graber ML. Differential Diagnosis Generators: an Evaluation of Currently Available Computer Programs. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; doi:10.​1007/​s11606-011-1804-8.PubMed
9.
Berner ES, Webster GD, Shugerman AA, Jackson JR, Algina J, Baker AL, et al. Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1792–1796.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Kassirer JP. A report card on computer-assisted diagnosis–the grade: C. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1824–1825.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Tang H, Ng JH. Googling for a diagnosis–use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study. BMJ. 2006;333(7579):1143–1145.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991;11(2):88–94.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Friedman CP, Gatti GG, Franz TM, Murphy GC, Wolf FM, Heckerling PS, et al. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? Implications for decision support and error reduction. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(4):334–339.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 Suppl):S2–S23.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):775–780.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ramnarayan P, Winrow A, Coren M, Nanduri V, Buchdahl R, Jacobs B, et al. Diagnostic omission errors in acute paediatric practice: impact of a reminder system on decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:37.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Schiff GD, Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1066–1069.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–841.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Massucci JL, Jaeger J, Rosenfeld JC, Patow C, et al. Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2009;84(12):1775–1787.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Diercks D, Farkouh ME, Garvey JL, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(17):1756–1776.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, Shekelle P. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(3):181–189.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A Follow-Up Report Card on Computer-Assisted Diagnosis—the Grade: C+
Authors
Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP
C. William Hanson, MD, III
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1944-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2012 Go to the issue

Reviews

Atherosclerosis Screening by Noninvasive Imaging for Cardiovascular Prevention: A Systematic Review

Original Research

Young Adults at Risk for Excess Alcohol Consumption Are Often Not Asked or Counseled About Drinking Alcohol

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

The Parallels between Parenting and Patient Care

Erratum

Erratum to: Cost Implications of ACGME’s 2011 Changes to Resident Duty Hours and the Training Environment

Editorials

The ACGME’s 2011 Changes to Resident Duty Hours: Are They an Unfunded Mandate on Teaching Hospitals?

Original Research

Confined to Ignorance: The Absence of Prisoner Information from Nationally Representative Health Data Sets
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits