Top

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Published in:

01-03-2012 | Original Article

A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in the Bone, Around the Implant Supporting a Mandibular Overdenture with Ball/O Ring and Magnetic Attachment

Authors: Jins John, V. Rangarajan, Ravindra C. Savadi, K. S. Satheesh Kumar, Preeti Satheesh Kumar

Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society | Issue 1/2012

Abstract

Today implant dentistry has made great inroads into the treatment modalities that are available in treating an edentulous patient. Popularity of a two implant retained overdenture has created a necessity to examine the various attachment systems being used and the stresses that are transmitted to the alveolar bone. Hence a Three dimensional Finite Element Analysis was done to analyze the stress distribution in the mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture having Ball/O-ring and Magnet attachments of different diameters. A segment of the anterior region of the mandible was modeled with implant and the overdenture. Four different models were generated having Ball/O-Ring and Magnet Attachments. Forces of 10 N, 35 N and 70 N were applied from the horizontal, vertical and oblique directions respectively and the stress distribution studied. It was concluded that the greatest stress concentrations were seen at the crest of the cortical bone and could be reduced by using smaller sized attachments for implant supported-overdenture.

Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S et al (2002) The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 19(1):3–4PubMedCrossRef

Mericske-Stern R (1998) Treatment outcome with implant supported overdentures: clinical consideration. J Prosthet Dent 79:66–73PubMedCrossRef

Celik G, Uludag B (2007) Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 97(4):229–235PubMedCrossRef

Meijer HJA, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman FA (1996) Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible. A three-dimensional finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 23:757–763PubMedCrossRef

Misch CE (2005) Dental implant prosthetics. Mosby, Inc

Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, Barra L, Lemonge A (2003) Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(5):675–684PubMed

Mastero product catalog: BioHorizon (2004)

Biesaga R (2004) Dyna magnet manual. Dyna Magnet Inc

Fujimoto T, Niimi A, Murakami I, Ueda M (1998) Use of new magnetic attachments for implant-supported overdentures. J Oral Implantol 24(3):147–151PubMedCrossRef

10.

Geng JP, Tan KBC, Liu GR (2001) Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent 85:585–598PubMedCrossRef

11.

Mericske-Stern R, Overdentures ZG (1993) An alternative implant methodology for edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 6:203–208PubMed

12.

Koolstra JH, Van eijden TMGJ, Naeije M, Weijs WA (1988) A three-dimensional model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 21:563–576

13.

Van Kampen FMC, Van Der Bilt A, Cune MS, Bosman F (2002) The influence of various attachment types in mandibular implant retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG. J Dent Res 81(3):170–173PubMedCrossRef

14.

Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soytian E (2004) The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant supported prosthesis and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91:144–150PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kenny R, Richards MW (1998) Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 80:559–564CrossRef

16.

Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K (2003) In vitro study of mandibular overdenture retained with ball, magnet or bar attachment: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthdont 16:128–134

17.

Rutkunas V, Mizutani H (2004) Retentive and stabilizing properties of stud and magnetic attachments retaining mandibular overdenture. an in vitro study. Stomatol Baltic Dent Maxillofac J 6:85–90

18.

Preiskel H (1996) Overdentures made easy: A guide to implant and tooth supported prosthesis. Quentessence, London

19.

Wiemeyer Agar JR, Kazemi RB (2001) Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelisim. J Prostho Dent 86(4):434–437CrossRef

20.

Riley MA, Walmsley AD, Harris IR (2001) Magnets in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 86(2):137–142PubMedCrossRef

21.

Doukas D, Michelinakis G, Smith PW, Barclay CW (2008) The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values. Int J Prosthodont 21(2):152–154PubMed

22.

Gulizio MP, Agar JR, Kelly JR (2005) Taylor TD effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. J Prosthodont 14(1):3–11PubMedCrossRef

23.

Michelinakis G, Barclay CW, Smith PW (2006) The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values. Int J Prosthodont 19(5):507–512PubMed

24.

Leung T, Preiskel HW (1991) Retention profiles of stud-type precision attachments. Int J Prosthodont 4(2):175–179PubMed

25.

Haraldson T, Jemt T, Stalbald P, Lekholm U (1988) Functions in subjects with overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res 96:235–242PubMed

26.

Brocher L, Reichart P (1983) Three dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 62(2):155–159CrossRef

27.

Chen C, Brudvik JS, Lloyd A, Jeffrey M, Rubenstein E, Chitswe K, Ariel J (2011) Raigrodski freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 106(2):78–86PubMedCrossRef

28.

Meijer HJA, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJM, Bosman FJM (1992) Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implant and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 68:96–102PubMedCrossRef

29.

Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K (2008) Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Impl Res 19(3):271–275CrossRef

30.

Burns DR, John UW, Ronald EK Jr, Beck DA (1995) Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdenture: Part I-retention stability and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent 73:354–363PubMedCrossRef

31.

Chan MFWY, Johnson C, Howell RA, Cowood JI (1995) Prosthetic management of the atrophic mandible using endosseous implants and overdentures. Br Dent J 179:329–337PubMedCrossRef

32.

Żmudzki J, Chladek W, Krukowska J (2009) Attachments of implant retained tissue supported denture under biting forces. Arch Comput Mater Sci Surf Eng 1(1):13–20

33.

Bathe K-J (2002) Finite element procedure, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt Ltd

Title: A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in the Bone, Around the Implant Supporting a Mandibular Overdenture with Ball/O Ring and Magnetic Attachment
Authors: Jins John
V. Rangarajan
Ravindra C. Savadi
K. S. Satheesh Kumar
Preeti Satheesh Kumar
Publication date: 01-03-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0972-4052
Electronic ISSN: 1998-4057
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0114-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in the Bone, Around the Implant Supporting a Mandibular Overdenture with Ball/O Ring and Magnetic Attachment

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Patient Satisfaction in Prosthodontic Treatment: Multidimensional Paradigm

Comparative Evaluation of Dimension and Surface Detail Accuracy of Models Produced by Three Different Rapid Prototype Techniques

Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry Using Digital Photographs with Computer Aided Analysis

Managing the Edentulous Dry Mouth: The Two Part Mandibular Denture

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Stem Cell Mediated Tooth Regeneration: New Vistas in Dentistry

Evaluation of Certain Dentofacial Characteristics as Predisposing Factors in Patients with Myofacial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome