Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Editorial

A Decade of Data Mining and Still Counting

Authors: Dr Manfred Haubenand, G. Niklas Norén

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Excerpt

The introduction of database-wide disproportionality screening for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems (SRS)[1] sparked a renaissance in pharmacovigilance research notable for numerous peer reviewed research articles, three expert working groups/white papers,[24] countless meetings, symposia, workshops, graduate school theses and aggressive promotion of proprietary software. In addition to expanding the pharmacovigilance toolkit, this research has yielded ancillary benefits beyond patient safety, including an increased awareness of data quality issues such as case report duplication,[5,6] the importance of adverse event coding terminology,[7,8] the proper definition of signal in drug safety,[9] the logic of signal detection [10] and an admonition that conflicts of interest, both intellectual and financial, may not only involve the ‘usual suspects’ such as software vendors, but also other stakeholders that may not normally come to mind, such as regulatory authorities.[11] …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54(4): 315–21PubMedCrossRef Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54(4): 315–21PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Almenoff J, Tonning JM, Gould AL, et al. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2005; 28(11): 981–1007PubMedCrossRef Almenoff J, Tonning JM, Gould AL, et al. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2005; 28(11): 981–1007PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference CIOMS Working Group VIII. Report on practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance. Geneva: CIOMS. In press CIOMS Working Group VIII. Report on practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance. Geneva: CIOMS. In press
5.
go back to reference Norén GN, Orre R, Bate A, et al. Duplicate detection in adverse drug reaction surveillance. Data Min Knowl Discov 2007; 14: 305–28CrossRef Norén GN, Orre R, Bate A, et al. Duplicate detection in adverse drug reaction surveillance. Data Min Knowl Discov 2007; 14: 305–28CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hauben M, Reich L, DeMicco J, et al. Extreme duplication in the US FDA Adverse Events Reporting System database. Drug Saf 2007; 30(6): 551–4PubMedCrossRef Hauben M, Reich L, DeMicco J, et al. Extreme duplication in the US FDA Adverse Events Reporting System database. Drug Saf 2007; 30(6): 551–4PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Henegar C, Bousquet C, Lillo-Le Louët A, et al. Building an ontology of adverse drug reactions for automated signal generation in pharmacovigilance. Comput Biol Med 2006; 36(7–8): 748–67PubMedCrossRef Henegar C, Bousquet C, Lillo-Le Louët A, et al. Building an ontology of adverse drug reactions for automated signal generation in pharmacovigilance. Comput Biol Med 2006; 36(7–8): 748–67PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brown EG. Effects of coding dictionary on signal generation: a consideration of use of MedDRA compared with WHO-ART. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6): 445–52PubMedCrossRef Brown EG. Effects of coding dictionary on signal generation: a consideration of use of MedDRA compared with WHO-ART. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6): 445–52PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hauben M, Aronson JK. Defining ‘signal’ and its subtypes in pharmacovigilance based on a systematic review of previous definitions. Drug Saf 2009; 32(2): 99–110PubMedCrossRef Hauben M, Aronson JK. Defining ‘signal’ and its subtypes in pharmacovigilance based on a systematic review of previous definitions. Drug Saf 2009; 32(2): 99–110PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Meyboom RH, Lindquist M, Egberts AC, et al. Signal selection and follow-up in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6): 459–65PubMedCrossRef Meyboom RH, Lindquist M, Egberts AC, et al. Signal selection and follow-up in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6): 459–65PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Erratum. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 64 (1): 118 Erratum. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 64 (1): 118
12.
go back to reference Lindquist M, Ståhl M, Bate A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database. Drug Saf 2000; 23(6): 533–42PubMedCrossRef Lindquist M, Ståhl M, Bate A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database. Drug Saf 2000; 23(6): 533–42PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hochberg AM, Hauben M, Pearson RK, et al. An evaluation of three signal-detection algorithms using a highly inclusive reference event database. Drug Saf 2009; 32(6): 509–25PubMedCrossRef Hochberg AM, Hauben M, Pearson RK, et al. An evaluation of three signal-detection algorithms using a highly inclusive reference event database. Drug Saf 2009; 32(6): 509–25PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bailey S, Singh A, Azadian R, et al. Prospective data mining of six products in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: disposition of events identified and impact on product safety profiles. Drug Saf 2010; 33(2): 139–46PubMedCrossRef Bailey S, Singh A, Azadian R, et al. Prospective data mining of six products in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: disposition of events identified and impact on product safety profiles. Drug Saf 2010; 33(2): 139–46PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alvarez Y, Hidalgo A, Maignen F, et al. Validation of statistical signal detection procedures in EudraVigilance post-authorisation data: a retrospective evaluation of the potential for earlier signalling. Drug Saf 2010; 33(6): 475–87PubMedCrossRef Alvarez Y, Hidalgo A, Maignen F, et al. Validation of statistical signal detection procedures in EudraVigilance post-authorisation data: a retrospective evaluation of the potential for earlier signalling. Drug Saf 2010; 33(6): 475–87PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ståhl M, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. Introducing triage logic as a new strategy for the detection of signals in the WHO Drug Monitoring Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004; 13(6): 355–63PubMedCrossRef Ståhl M, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. Introducing triage logic as a new strategy for the detection of signals in the WHO Drug Monitoring Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004; 13(6): 355–63PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Levitan B, Yee CL, Russo L, et al. A model for decision support in signal triage. Drug Saf 2008; 31(9): 727–35PubMedCrossRef Levitan B, Yee CL, Russo L, et al. A model for decision support in signal triage. Drug Saf 2008; 31(9): 727–35PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Walker AM. Orthogonal predictions: follow-up questions for suggestive data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010; 19(5): 529–32PubMed Walker AM. Orthogonal predictions: follow-up questions for suggestive data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010; 19(5): 529–32PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hauben M, Reich L, Gerrits CM, et al. Illusions of objectivity and a recommendation for reporting data mining results. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63(5): 517–21PubMedCrossRef Hauben M, Reich L, Gerrits CM, et al. Illusions of objectivity and a recommendation for reporting data mining results. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63(5): 517–21PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hauben M, Bate A. Data mining in drug safety: side effects of drugs essay. In: Aronson JK, editor. Side effects of drugs annual. Vol. 29. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007: xxxiii–xlviCrossRef Hauben M, Bate A. Data mining in drug safety: side effects of drugs essay. In: Aronson JK, editor. Side effects of drugs annual. Vol. 29. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007: xxxiii–xlviCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Meyboom RH, Hekster YA, Egberts AC, et al. Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1997; 17(6): 374–89PubMedCrossRef Meyboom RH, Hekster YA, Egberts AC, et al. Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1997; 17(6): 374–89PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Hauben M, Reich L. Response to letter by Levine et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61(1): 115–7CrossRef Hauben M, Reich L. Response to letter by Levine et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61(1): 115–7CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Almenoff JS, LaCroix KK, Yuen NA, et al. Comparative performance of two quantitative safety signalling methods: implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department. Drug Saf 2006; 29(10): 875–87PubMedCrossRef Almenoff JS, LaCroix KK, Yuen NA, et al. Comparative performance of two quantitative safety signalling methods: implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department. Drug Saf 2006; 29(10): 875–87PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hochberg AM, Hauben M. Time-to-signal comparison for drug safety data-mining algorithms vs. traditional signaling criteria. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 85(6): 600–6PubMedCrossRef Hochberg AM, Hauben M. Time-to-signal comparison for drug safety data-mining algorithms vs. traditional signaling criteria. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 85(6): 600–6PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bate A, Edwards IR. Data mining in spontaneous reports. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006; 98(3): 324–30PubMedCrossRef Bate A, Edwards IR. Data mining in spontaneous reports. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006; 98(3): 324–30PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Decade of Data Mining and Still Counting
Authors
Dr Manfred Haubenand
G. Niklas Norén
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11532430-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

Drug Safety 7/2010 Go to the issue

Review Article

Amiodarone