Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

A cross-sectional study of the relationship between injuries and quality of life, psychological distress, sleeping problems, and global subjective health in adults from three Norwegian counties

Authors: Leif Edvard Aarø, Eyvind Ohm, Jens Christoffer Skogen, Thomas Nilsen, Marit Knapstad, Øystein Vedaa, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Benjamin Clarsen, Knut-Inge Klepp

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Studies examining associations between injuries and outcomes like quality of life and psychological distress are important to understand a broader range of possible consequences of injuries for population health.

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine associations between self-reported injury and quality of life, psychological distress, sleeping problems, and global subjective health.

Methods

The sample was drawn from the Norwegian National Population Register. Data were collected among the general adult populations in three Norwegian counties in 2019–2020 (response rate 45.3%, n = 74,030). Exposure variables were being injured during the last 12 months, cause of injury (if more than one, the most serious one), and functional impairment due to injuries. Outcome variables included measures of total quality of life, global quality of life, positive affect, negative affect, positive social relations, social capital (trust, belongingness, feeling safe), psychological distress, sleep problems, loneliness, and global subjective health. Data were analysed with General Linear Modelling in SPSS Complex.

Results

Reporting to have been injured once during the last 12 months was associated with slightly elevated levels of psychological distress, sleeping problems, and loneliness, and lower mean scores on quality-of-life indicators and global subjective health. Reporting being injured twice or more showed more pronounced contrasts to the reference group on the same outcomes, with Cohen’s d-values (absolute numbers) ranging from 0.17 to 0.54. For having been victim to violence, d-values ranged from 0.30 to 1.01. Moderate functional impairment due to injuries was associated with less favourable scores on all outcomes (d ranging from 0.15 to 0.71). For strong functional impairment d-values ranged from 0.35 to 1.17.

Conclusions

Elevated levels of distress and reduced levels of quality of life are particularly associated with multiple injuries, being victim to violence, and functional impairment due to injuries. Prospective, longitudinal studies with high quality instruments and large samples, allowing adjustment for baseline values of outcome variables, and utilization of state-of-the-art statistical techniques, would bring this research closer to examining causality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 2020. 396(10258): p. 1204–1222. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 2020. 396(10258): p. 1204–1222.
2.
go back to reference Knudsen, A.K., et al., Resultater fra Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2015 (GBD 2015). . 2015, Norwegian Institute of Public Health: OsloBergen. Knudsen, A.K., et al., Resultater fra Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2015 (GBD 2015). . 2015, Norwegian Institute of Public Health: OsloBergen.
4.
go back to reference Pagulayan KF, et al. A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(5):611–8.PubMedCrossRef Pagulayan KF, et al. A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(5):611–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Griffin XL, et al. Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation--a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-b(3):372–82.PubMedCrossRef Griffin XL, et al. Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation--a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-b(3):372–82.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference McMinn KR, et al. Psychological morbidity and functional impairment following traumatic pelvic injury. Injury. 2020;51(4):978–83.PubMedCrossRef McMinn KR, et al. Psychological morbidity and functional impairment following traumatic pelvic injury. Injury. 2020;51(4):978–83.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aitken LM, et al. Health status after traumatic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1702–8.PubMedCrossRef Aitken LM, et al. Health status after traumatic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1702–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Derrett S, et al. Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study: recruitment, and participant characteristics, health and disability status. Inj Prev. 2011;17(6):415–8.PubMedCrossRef Derrett S, et al. Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study: recruitment, and participant characteristics, health and disability status. Inj Prev. 2011;17(6):415–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gross T, et al. Outcome in polytraumatized patients with and without brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(9):1163–74.PubMedCrossRef Gross T, et al. Outcome in polytraumatized patients with and without brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(9):1163–74.PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Jagnoor J, et al. Mortality and health-related quality of life following injuries and associated factors: a cohort study in Chandigarh. North India Inj Prev. 2020;26(4):315–23.PubMedCrossRef Jagnoor J, et al. Mortality and health-related quality of life following injuries and associated factors: a cohort study in Chandigarh. North India Inj Prev. 2020;26(4):315–23.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kendrick D, et al. Psychological morbidity and health-related quality of life after injury: multicentre cohort study. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(5):1233–50.PubMedCrossRef Kendrick D, et al. Psychological morbidity and health-related quality of life after injury: multicentre cohort study. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(5):1233–50.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maclennan B, et al. Injury severity and 3-month outcomes among Maori: results from a New Zealand prospective cohort study. N Z Med J. 2013;126(1379):39–49.PubMed Maclennan B, et al. Injury severity and 3-month outcomes among Maori: results from a New Zealand prospective cohort study. N Z Med J. 2013;126(1379):39–49.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Aitken LM, et al. Health status of critically ill trauma patients. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(5–6):704–15.PubMedCrossRef Aitken LM, et al. Health status of critically ill trauma patients. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(5–6):704–15.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aitken LM, et al. Physical Function and Mental Health in Trauma Intensive Care Patients: A 2-Year Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(4):734–46.PubMedCrossRef Aitken LM, et al. Physical Function and Mental Health in Trauma Intensive Care Patients: A 2-Year Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(4):734–46.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alsaker K, Moen B, Kristoffersen K. Health-related quality of life among abused women one year after leaving a violent partner. Soc Indic Res. 2008;86(3):497–509.CrossRef Alsaker K, Moen B, Kristoffersen K. Health-related quality of life among abused women one year after leaving a violent partner. Soc Indic Res. 2008;86(3):497–509.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Llaquet Bayo H, et al. Analysis of quality of life after major trauma: a spanish follow-up cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(2):289–97.PubMedCrossRef Llaquet Bayo H, et al. Analysis of quality of life after major trauma: a spanish follow-up cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(2):289–97.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Meerding WJ, et al. Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(1):150–61.PubMedCrossRef Meerding WJ, et al. Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(1):150–61.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Polinder S, et al. Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma. 2007;62(1):133–41.PubMedCrossRef Polinder S, et al. Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma. 2007;62(1):133–41.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Soberg HL, et al. The trajectory of physical and mental health from injury to 5 years after multiple trauma: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(5):765–74.PubMedCrossRef Soberg HL, et al. The trajectory of physical and mental health from injury to 5 years after multiple trauma: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(5):765–74.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Soberg HL, et al. Physical and mental health 10 years after multiple trauma: A prospective cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):628–33.PubMedCrossRef Soberg HL, et al. Physical and mental health 10 years after multiple trauma: A prospective cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):628–33.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tøien K, et al. Health related quality of life in trauma patients. Data from a one-year follow up study compared with the general population. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tøien K, et al. Health related quality of life in trauma patients. Data from a one-year follow up study compared with the general population. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zwingmann J, et al. Lower Health-Related Quality of Life in Polytrauma Patients: Long-Term Follow-Up After Over 5 Years. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(19): e3515.PubMedCrossRef Zwingmann J, et al. Lower Health-Related Quality of Life in Polytrauma Patients: Long-Term Follow-Up After Over 5 Years. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(19): e3515.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nguyen H, Ivers R, Pham C. Health-related quality of life and recovery patterns among hospitalised injury patients in Vietnam. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):619–29.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen H, Ivers R, Pham C. Health-related quality of life and recovery patterns among hospitalised injury patients in Vietnam. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):619–29.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Skogstad L, et al. Psychological distress after physical injury: a one-year follow-up study of conscious hospitalised patients. Injury. 2014;45(1):289–98.PubMedCrossRef Skogstad L, et al. Psychological distress after physical injury: a one-year follow-up study of conscious hospitalised patients. Injury. 2014;45(1):289–98.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gabbe BJ, et al. Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: A population-based longitudinal study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7): e1002322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gabbe BJ, et al. Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: A population-based longitudinal study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7): e1002322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tamura N, Kuriyama A, Kaihara T. Health-related quality of life in trauma patients at 12 months after injury: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(6):1107–13.PubMedCrossRef Tamura N, Kuriyama A, Kaihara T. Health-related quality of life in trauma patients at 12 months after injury: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(6):1107–13.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gabbe BJ, et al. Evaluating time points for measuring recovery after major trauma in adults. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):166–72.PubMedCrossRef Gabbe BJ, et al. Evaluating time points for measuring recovery after major trauma in adults. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):166–72.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Scholten AC, et al. Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review. Popul Health Metrics. 2017;15(1):10.CrossRef Scholten AC, et al. Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review. Popul Health Metrics. 2017;15(1):10.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gross T, Morell S, Amsler F. Gender-Specific Improvements in Outcome 1 and 2 Years After Major Trauma. J Surg Res. 2019;235:459–69.PubMedCrossRef Gross T, Morell S, Amsler F. Gender-Specific Improvements in Outcome 1 and 2 Years After Major Trauma. J Surg Res. 2019;235:459–69.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Geraerds A, et al. A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010–2018. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):160.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Geraerds A, et al. A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010–2018. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):160.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hisasue T, et al. Quality of life, psychological distress and violence among women in close relationships: a population-based study in Finland. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hisasue T, et al. Quality of life, psychological distress and violence among women in close relationships: a population-based study in Finland. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Rivara F, et al. The effects of violence on health. Health Aff. 2019;38(10):1622–9.CrossRef Rivara F, et al. The effects of violence on health. Health Aff. 2019;38(10):1622–9.CrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Keramat SA, et al. Estimating the effects of physical violence and serious injury on health-related quality of life: Evidence from 19 waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(11):3153–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Keramat SA, et al. Estimating the effects of physical violence and serious injury on health-related quality of life: Evidence from 19 waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(11):3153–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Tambs K, Moum T. How well can a few questionnaire items indicate anxiety and depression? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993;87(5):364–7.PubMedCrossRef Tambs K, Moum T. How well can a few questionnaire items indicate anxiety and depression? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993;87(5):364–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Strand BH, et al. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(2):113–8.PubMedCrossRef Strand BH, et al. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(2):113–8.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Schmalbach B, et al. Psychometric Properties of Two Brief Versions of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist: HSCL-5 and HSCL-10. Assessment. 2021;28(2):617–31.PubMedCrossRef Schmalbach B, et al. Psychometric Properties of Two Brief Versions of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist: HSCL-5 and HSCL-10. Assessment. 2021;28(2):617–31.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Nes, R.B., T. Hansen, and A. Barstad, Quality of life. Recommendations for an improved measurement system. . 2018, Norwegian Directorate of Health: Oslo. Nes, R.B., T. Hansen, and A. Barstad, Quality of life. Recommendations for an improved measurement system. . 2018, Norwegian Directorate of Health: Oslo.
45.
go back to reference Aarø, L.E., et al., Evaluation of the “Minimum list” based on data from the Norwegian Counties Public Health Surveys., in Quality of Life in Norway 2019, R.B. Nes, et al., Editors. 2020, Norwegian Directorate of Health: Oslo. p. 93–115. Aarø, L.E., et al., Evaluation of the “Minimum list” based on data from the Norwegian Counties Public Health Surveys., in Quality of Life in Norway 2019, R.B. Nes, et al., Editors. 2020, Norwegian Directorate of Health: Oslo. p. 93–115.
46.
go back to reference Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40.PubMedCrossRef Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40.PubMedCrossRef
47.
49.
go back to reference Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988. Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
50.
go back to reference Mund M, Nestler S. Beyond the Cross-Lagged Panel Model: Next-generation statistical tools for analyzing interdependencies across the life course. Advances in Life Course Research. 2019;41: 100249.PubMedCrossRef Mund M, Nestler S. Beyond the Cross-Lagged Panel Model: Next-generation statistical tools for analyzing interdependencies across the life course. Advances in Life Course Research. 2019;41: 100249.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Hamaker EL, Kuiper RM, Grasman RP. A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol Methods. 2015;20(1):102–16.PubMedCrossRef Hamaker EL, Kuiper RM, Grasman RP. A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol Methods. 2015;20(1):102–16.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Madsen C, et al. Geografisk og sosial ulikhet for skader behandlet ved Oslo skadelegevakt. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2017. Madsen C, et al. Geografisk og sosial ulikhet for skader behandlet ved Oslo skadelegevakt. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2017.
53.
go back to reference Ohm E, et al. Incidence of injuries in Norway: linking primary and secondary care data. Scand J Public Health. 2020;48(3):323–30.PubMedCrossRef Ohm E, et al. Incidence of injuries in Norway: linking primary and secondary care data. Scand J Public Health. 2020;48(3):323–30.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Clarsen B, et al. Revisiting the continuum of resistance model in the digital age: a comparison of early and delayed respondents to the Norwegian counties public health survey. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(730):1–10. Clarsen B, et al. Revisiting the continuum of resistance model in the digital age: a comparison of early and delayed respondents to the Norwegian counties public health survey. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(730):1–10.
Metadata
Title
A cross-sectional study of the relationship between injuries and quality of life, psychological distress, sleeping problems, and global subjective health in adults from three Norwegian counties
Authors
Leif Edvard Aarø
Eyvind Ohm
Jens Christoffer Skogen
Thomas Nilsen
Marit Knapstad
Øystein Vedaa
Ragnhild Bang Nes
Benjamin Clarsen
Knut-Inge Klepp
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02191-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2023 Go to the issue