Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students

Authors: Sharyn Burns, Jonine Jancey, Gemma Crawford, Jonathan Hallett, Linda Portsmouth, Janelle Longo

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hazardous drinking has been found to be higher among young university students compared to their non-university peers. Although young university students are exposed to new and exciting experiences, including greater availability and emphasis on social functions involving alcohol there are few multi strategy comprehensive interventions aimed at reducing alcohol-related harms.

Methods

Random cross sectional online surveys were administered to 18–24 year old students studying at the main campus of a large metropolitan university in Perth, Western Australia. Prior to the completion of the second survey an alcohol intervention was implemented on campus. Completed surveys were received from 2465 (Baseline; T1) and 2422 (Post Year 1: T2) students. Students who consumed alcohol in the past 12 months were categorised as low risk or hazardous drinkers using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Due to the cross sectional nature of the two samples two-tailed two-proportion z-test and two sample t-tests were employed to determine statistical significance between the two time periods for categorical and continuous variables respectively.

Results

At T1 and T2 89.1 % and 87.2 % of the total sample reported drinking alcohol in the past month respectively. Hazardous levels of alcohol consumption reduced slightly between T1 (39.7 %) and T2 (38 %). In both time periods hazardous drinkers reported significantly higher mean scores for experienced harm, second-hand harm and witnessed harm scores compared to low risk drinkers (p <0.001). Hazardous drinkers were significantly more likely to experience academic problems due to their alcohol consumption and to report more positive alcohol expectations than low risk drinkers at both time periods (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Harms and problems for students who report hazardous drinking are of concern and efforts should be made to ensure integrated and targeted strategies reach higher risk students and focus on specific issues such as driving while intoxicated and alcohol related unplanned sexual activity. However there is also a need for universal strategies targeting all students and low risk drinkers as they too are exposed to alcohol harms within the drinking and social environment. Changing the culture of the university environment is a long term aim and to effect change a sustained combination of organisational actions, partnerships and educational actions is required.
Literature
1.
White HR. Reduction of alcohol-related harm on United States College campuses: the use of personal feedback interventions. Int J Drug Policy. 2006;17(4):310–9.CrossRef
2.
VanKim NA, Laska MN, Ehlinger E, Lust K, Story M. Understanding young adult physical activity, alcohol and tobacco use in community colleges and 4-year post-secondary institutions: a cross-sectional analysis of epidemiological surveillance data. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Kypri K, Paschall MJ, Langley J, Baxter J, Cashell-Smith M, Bourdeau B. Drinking and alcohol-related harm among New Zealand University students: findings from a national web-based survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33(2):307–14.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Hallett J, Howat P, McManus A, Meng R, Maycock B, Kypri K. Academic and personal problems among Australian university students who drink at hazardous levels: web-based survey. Health Promot J Austr. 2013;24:170–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Rickwood D, George A, Parker R, Mikhailovich K. Harmful alcohol use on campus: impact on young people at university. Youth Studies Australia. 2011;30(1):34–40.
6.
Hallett J, Howat P, Maycock BR, McManus A, Kypri K, Dhaliwal SS. Undergraduate student drinking and related harms at an Australian university: web-based survey of a large random sample. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Burns S. Sexual health, alcohol and the university environment: is there a need for sexual health promotion intervention? Sex Health. 2015;12(3):269–71. doi:10.​1071/​SH14215.
8.
Kypri K, Cronin M, Wright CS. Do university students drink more hazardously than their non-student peers? Addiction. 2005;100:713–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hallett J, McManus A, Maycock B, Smith J, Howat P. Excessive drinking—an inescapable part of university life? A focus group study of Australian undergraduates. Open J Prev Med. 2014;4:616–29.CrossRef
10.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013. Drug statistics series no. 28. Cat. no. PHE 183. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
11.
Crawford G, Freijah R, Wilkins A, Wylde P. Sex, Drugs and Mental Health: design and delivery of health promotion initatives in a university setting. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Student Services Association. 2007;29:52–71.
12.
Fachini A, Aliane PP, Martinez EZ, Furtado EF. Efficacy of brief alcohol screening intervention for college students (BASICS): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012;7:40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Kypri K, Hallett J, Howat P, McManus A, Maycock B, Bowe S, Horton NJ. Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(16):1508–14.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. In: Vasta R, editor. Annals of child development Vol6. Six theories of child development edn. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1989. p. 1–60.
15.
Ahlström S, Österberg E. International perspectives on adolescent and young adult drinking. Alcohol Res Health. 2004/2005;28:258–268.
16.
Rose RJ, Dick DM. Gene-environment interplay in adolescent drinking behavior. Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(4):222–9.
17.
Helene Raskin W, Jackson K. Social and psychological influences on emerging adult drinking behavior. Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(4):182–90.
18.
Glider P. Challenging the collegiate rite of passage: a campus-wide social marketing media campaign to reduce binge drinking. J Drug Educ. 2001;31(2):207.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Osberg TM, Atkins L, Buchholz L, Shirshova V, Swiantek A, Whitley J, Hartman S, Oquendo N. Development and validation of the college life alcohol salience scale: a measure of beliefs about the role of alcohol in college life. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010;24(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Fry M-L. Seeking the pleasure zone: understanding young adult’s intoxication culture. Australas Mark J. 2011;19(1):65–70.CrossRef
21.
Hernandez L, Leontini R, Harley K. Alcohol, university students, and harm-minimization campaigns: “A fine line between a good night out and a nightmare”. Contemp Drug Probl. 2013;40(2):157–189,156.CrossRef
22.
Dunn ME, Goldman MS. Validation of multidimensional scaling-based modeling of alcohol expectancies in memory: age and drinking-related differences in expectancies of children assessed as first associates. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24:1639–46.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2005.
24.
Joss N, Keleher H. Community development and partnerships. In: Keleher H, MacDougall C, editors. Understanding Health. 3rd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2011.
25.
Crawford G, Burns S, Chih HJ, Hunt K, Tilley M, Hallett J, Coleman K, Smith S. Mental health first aid training for nursing students: a protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in a large university. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:26. doi:10.​1186/​s12888-015-0403-3.
26.
Kingsland M, Wolfenden L, Rowland BC, Gillham KE, Kennedy VJ, Ramsden RL, Colbran RW, Weir S, Wiggers JH. Alcohol consumption and sport: a cross-sectional study of alcohol management practices associated with at-risk alcohol consumption at community football clubs. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:762.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Stallman HM. Psychological distress in university students: a comparison with general population data. Aust Psychol. 2010;45(4):249–57.CrossRef
28.
Said D, Kypri K, Bowman J. Risk factors for mental disorder among university students in Australia: findings from a web-based cross-sectional survey. Soc Pyschiatry Pyschiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48:935–44.CrossRef
29.
Jorm AF, Kitchener BA, O’Kearney R, Dear K. Mental health first aid training of the public in a rural area: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
O’Reilly CL, Bell J, Kelly PJ, Chen TF. Impact of mental health first aid training on pharmacy students’ knowledge, attitudes and self-reported behaviour: a controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(7):549–57.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Hallett J, Maycock B, Kypri K, Howat P, McManus A. Development of a web-based alcohol intervention for university students: processes and challenges. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009;28(1):31–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Burns SK, Portsmouth L. Health promotion. In: Felicity A, editor. Health Psychology and Behaviour in Australia. edn. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2010. p. 457–86.
35.
Howat PA, Maycock BR, Cross DS, Collins JM, Jackson L, Burns SK, James RW. Towards a more unified definition of health promotion. Health Promot J Austr. 2003;14(2):82–5.
36.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: detailed findings. In: Drug statistics series no 22. Canberra: AIHW; 2008.
37.
Saunders JB, Assland OG, Babor TF, De La Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption—II. Addiction. 1993;88:791–804.CrossRefPubMed
38.
McGee R, Kypri K. Alcohol-related problems experienced by university students in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004;28:321–3.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Wechsler H, Lee JE, Kuo M, Seibring M, Nelson TF, Lee H. Trends in College binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College alcohol study surveys: 1993–2001. J Am Coll Heal. 2002;50(5):203–17.CrossRef
40.
Burns S, Crawford G, Hallett J, Jancey J, Portsmouth L, Hunt K, Longo J. Consequences of low risk and hazardous alcohol consumption among Australian university students in Australia and implications for Health Promotion Interventions. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015;5:1-13.
41.
Ham LS, Stewart SH, Norton PJ, Hope DA. Psychometric assessment of the comprehensive effects of alcohol questionnaire: comparing a brief version to the original full scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2005;27(3):141–58.CrossRef
42.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1993.
43.
Corbin WR, Iwamoto DK, Fromme K. Broad social motives, alcohol use, and related problems: mechanisms of risk from high school through college. Addict Behav. 2011;36:222–30.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Goodman RM, Steckler A, Kegler MC. Mobilizing organisations for health enhancement: theories of organisational change. In: Glanz K, Rimmer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education. edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
45.
Burns SK, Jancey J, Bowser N, Comfort J, Crawford G, Hallett J, Shields B, Portsmouth L. Moving forward: a cross sectional baseline study of staff and student attitudes towards a totally smoke free university campus. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:738.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Toomey TL, Lenk KM, Wadenaar AC. Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: an update of research findings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(2):208–19.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Stafford J, Allsop S, Daube M. From evidence to action: health promotion and alcohol. Health Promot J Austr. 2014;25:8–13.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Green J, Tones K, Cross R, Woodall J. Health promotion: planning and strategies. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2015.
49.
Kemm J. The limitations of ‘evidence-based’ public health. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12(3):319–24.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Green LW. Closing the chasm between research and practice: evidence of and for change. Health Promot J Austr. 2014;25(1):25–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
Authors
Sharyn Burns
Jonine Jancey
Gemma Crawford
Jonathan Hallett
Linda Portsmouth
Janelle Longo
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3314-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Obesity, diet quality, physical activity, and the built environment: the need for behavioral pathways

Research article

Substance use among Palestinian youth in the West Bank, Palestine: a qualitative investigation

Research article

Factors influencing uptake of HPV vaccination among girls in Germany

Research article

Factors associated with secondhand tobacco smoke in the home: an exploratory cross-sectional study among women in Aleta Wondo, Ethiopia

Research article

Understanding the impact of area-based interventions on area safety in deprived areas: realist evaluation of a neighbour nuisance intervention in Arnhem, the Netherlands

Research article

Effects of tobacco exposure on perinatal suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety