Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke

Authors: Katie I. Gallacher, Carl R. May, Peter Langhorne, Frances S. Mair

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Treatment burden is the workload of healthcare experienced by those with long-term conditions and the impact that this has on well-being. Treatment burden can negatively impact on quality of life and adherence to treatments. Individuals are likely to differ in their ability to manage health problems and follow treatments, defined as patient capacity. This has been under investigated in stroke. The aim of this paper is to create a conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity for people who have had a stroke through exploration of their experiences of healthcare.

Methods

Interviews were conducted at home with 29 individuals who have had a stroke. These were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Fifteen explored treatment burden and were analysed by framework analysis underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Fourteen explored patient capacity and were analysed by thematic analysis. Taxonomies of treatment burden and patient capacity were created and a conceptual model produced.

Results

Mean age was 68 years. Sixteen were men and 13 women. The following broad areas of treatment burden were identified: making sense of stroke management and planning care; interacting with others including health professionals, family and other stroke patients; enacting management strategies; and reflecting on management. Treatment burdens were identified as arising from either: the workload of healthcare; or the endurance of care deficiencies. Six factors were identified that influence patient capacity: personal attributes and skills; physical and cognitive abilities; support network; financial status; life workload, and environment.

Conclusions

Healthcare workload and the presence of care deficiencies can influence and be influenced by patient capacity. The quality and configuration of health and social care services has considerable influence on treatment burden and patient capacity. Findings have important implications for the design of clinical guidelines and healthcare delivery, highlighting issues such as the importance of good care co-ordination.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gallacher K, May C, Montori VM, et al. Understanding treatment burden in chronic heart failure patients. A qualitative study. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(3):235–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallacher K, May C, Montori VM, et al. Understanding treatment burden in chronic heart failure patients. A qualitative study. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(3):235–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Eton DT, Ramalho-de Oliveira D, Egginton JS, et al. Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2012;3:39–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eton DT, Ramalho-de Oliveira D, Egginton JS, et al. Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2012;3:39–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Shippee ND, Shah ND, May CR, et al. Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:1041–51.CrossRefPubMed Shippee ND, Shah ND, May CR, et al. Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:1041–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tran VT, Montori VM, Eton DT, et al. Development and description of measurement properties of an instrument to assess treatment burden among patients with multiple chronic conditions. BMC Med. 2012;10:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tran VT, Montori VM, Eton DT, et al. Development and description of measurement properties of an instrument to assess treatment burden among patients with multiple chronic conditions. BMC Med. 2012;10:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Gallacher K, Jani B, Morrison D, et al. Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallacher K, Jani B, Morrison D, et al. Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.CrossRef May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference May C, Murray E, Finch T, et al. Normalization Process Theory On-line Users’ Manual and Toolkit. Secondary Normalization Process Theory On-line Users’ Manual and Toolkit. 2010 2010. http://www.normalizationprocess.org. Accessed 28 Dec 2017. May C, Murray E, Finch T, et al. Normalization Process Theory On-line Users’ Manual and Toolkit. Secondary Normalization Process Theory On-line Users’ Manual and Toolkit. 2010 2010. http://​www.​normalizationpro​cess.​org. Accessed 28 Dec 2017.
17.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.CrossRef Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. J Adm Gov. 2009;4(2) Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. J Adm Gov. 2009;4(2)
19.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage; 1984. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage; 1984.
20.
go back to reference Bryman A, Burgess R. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993. Bryman A, Burgess R. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993.
21.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 77–101. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 77–101.
25.
go back to reference Chambers JA, O'Carrol RE, Hamilton B, et al. Adherence to medication in stroke survivors: a qualitative comparison of low and high adherers. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;16:592–609.CrossRefPubMed Chambers JA, O'Carrol RE, Hamilton B, et al. Adherence to medication in stroke survivors: a qualitative comparison of low and high adherers. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;16:592–609.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Metadata
Title
A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke
Authors
Katie I. Gallacher
Carl R. May
Peter Langhorne
Frances S. Mair
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0691-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Primary Care 1/2018 Go to the issue