Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

A Bayesian Bernoulli-Exponential joint model for binary longitudinal outcomes and informative time with applications to bladder cancer recurrence data

Author: Michael Safo Oduro

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A variety of methods exist for the analysis of longitudinal data, many of which are characterized with the assumption of fixed visit time points for study individuals. This, however is not always a tenable assumption. Phenomenon that alter subject visit patterns such as adverse events due to investigative treatment administered, travel or any other emergencies may result in unbalanced data and varying individual visit time points. Visit times can be considered informative, because subsequent or current subject outcomes can change or be adapted due to previous subject outcomes.

Methods

In this paper, a Bayesian Bernoulli-Exponential model for analyzing joint binary outcomes and exponentially distributed informative visit times is developed. Via statistical simulations, the influence of controlled variations in visit patterns, prior and sample size schemes on model performance is assessed. As an application example, the proposed model is applied to a Bladder Cancer Recurrence data.

Results and conclusions

Results from the simulation analysis indicated that the Bayesian Bernoulli-Exponential joint model converged in stationarity, and performed relatively better for small to medium sample size scenarios with less varying time sequences regardless of the choice of prior. In larger samples, the model performed better for less varying time sequences. This model’s application to the bladder cancer data showed a statistically significant effect of prior tumor recurrence on the probability of subsequent recurrences.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley; 2012. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley; 2012.
2.
go back to reference Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for discrete longitudinal data. 2005. Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for discrete longitudinal data. 2005.
3.
go back to reference Rizopoulos D. Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: With applications in R. CRC Press; 2012. Rizopoulos D. Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: With applications in R. CRC Press; 2012.
4.
go back to reference Twisk JW. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press; 2013. Twisk JW. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press; 2013.
5.
go back to reference Verbeke G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. In: Linear mixed models in practice. Springer; 1997. p. 63–153. Verbeke G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. In: Linear mixed models in practice. Springer; 1997. p. 63–153.
6.
go back to reference Bronsert MR. A joint model of a longitudinal process and informative time schedule data. University of Northern Colorado; 2009. Bronsert MR. A joint model of a longitudinal process and informative time schedule data. University of Northern Colorado; 2009.
7.
go back to reference Alomair MA. A Joint Model of Longitudinal Data and Informative Time with Time-Dependent Covariate. University of Northern Colorado; 2017. Alomair MA. A Joint Model of Longitudinal Data and Informative Time with Time-Dependent Covariate. University of Northern Colorado; 2017.
8.
go back to reference Seo J. Joint Models of Longitudinal Outcomes and Informative Time. 2015. Seo J. Joint Models of Longitudinal Outcomes and Informative Time. 2015.
9.
go back to reference Zaagan AAA. Bayesian Approach of Joint Models of Longitudinal Outcomes and Informative Time. University of Northern Colorado; 2020. Zaagan AAA. Bayesian Approach of Joint Models of Longitudinal Outcomes and Informative Time. University of Northern Colorado; 2020.
10.
go back to reference Byar D. The veterans administration study of chemoprophylaxis for recurrent stage i bladder tumours: comparisons of placebo, pyridoxine and topical thiotepa. In: Bladder tumors and other topics in urological oncology. Springer; 1980. p. 363–370. Byar D. The veterans administration study of chemoprophylaxis for recurrent stage i bladder tumours: comparisons of placebo, pyridoxine and topical thiotepa. In: Bladder tumors and other topics in urological oncology. Springer; 1980. p. 363–370.
11.
go back to reference Byar D, Blackard C, Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group, et al. Comparisons of placebo, pyridoxine, and topical thiotepa in preventing recurrence of stage I bladder cancer. Urology. 1977;10(6):556–561. Byar D, Blackard C, Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group, et al. Comparisons of placebo, pyridoxine, and topical thiotepa in preventing recurrence of stage I bladder cancer. Urology. 1977;10(6):556–561.
12.
go back to reference Nelder JA, Wedderburn RW. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc: Ser A (General). 1972;135(3):370–84. Nelder JA, Wedderburn RW. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc: Ser A (General). 1972;135(3):370–84.
13.
go back to reference McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1989.CrossRef McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1989.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lin, Ying Z. Semiparametric and nonparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(453):103–126. Lin, Ying Z. Semiparametric and nonparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(453):103–126.
15.
go back to reference Lin, Scharfstein DO, Rosenheck RA. Analysis of longitudinal data with irregular, outcome-dependent follow-up. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2004;66(3):791–813. Lin, Scharfstein DO, Rosenheck RA. Analysis of longitudinal data with irregular, outcome-dependent follow-up. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2004;66(3):791–813.
16.
go back to reference Liang, Lu W, Ying Z. Joint modeling and analysis of longitudinal data with informative observation times. Biometrics. 2009;65(2):377–384. Liang, Lu W, Ying Z. Joint modeling and analysis of longitudinal data with informative observation times. Biometrics. 2009;65(2):377–384.
17.
go back to reference Sun J, Park DH, Sun L, Zhao X. Semiparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data with informative observation times. J Am Stat Assoc. 2005;100(471):882–9.MathSciNetCrossRef Sun J, Park DH, Sun L, Zhao X. Semiparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data with informative observation times. J Am Stat Assoc. 2005;100(471):882–9.MathSciNetCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis Chapman & Hall. CRC Texts in Statistical Science; 2004. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis Chapman & Hall. CRC Texts in Statistical Science; 2004.
19.
go back to reference Lesaffre E, Lawson AB. Bayesian biostatistics. Wiley; 2012. Lesaffre E, Lawson AB. Bayesian biostatistics. Wiley; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Murray JV, Goldizen AW, O’Leary RA, McAlpine CA, Possingham HP, Choy SL. How useful is expert opinion for predicting the distribution of a species within and beyond the region of expertise? A case study using brush-tailed rock-wallabies Petrogale penicillata. J Appl Ecol. 2009;46(4):842–51.CrossRef Murray JV, Goldizen AW, O’Leary RA, McAlpine CA, Possingham HP, Choy SL. How useful is expert opinion for predicting the distribution of a species within and beyond the region of expertise? A case study using brush-tailed rock-wallabies Petrogale penicillata. J Appl Ecol. 2009;46(4):842–51.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy S, McBride M, et al. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol. 2012;26(1):29–38.CrossRefPubMed Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy S, McBride M, et al. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol. 2012;26(1):29–38.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Congdon P. Bayesian models for categorical data. Wiley; 2005. Congdon P. Bayesian models for categorical data. Wiley; 2005.
23.
go back to reference Wu L. Mixed effects models for complex data. CRC Press; 2009. Wu L. Mixed effects models for complex data. CRC Press; 2009.
24.
go back to reference Ntzoufras I. Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. vol. 698. Wiley; 2011. Ntzoufras I. Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. vol. 698. Wiley; 2011.
25.
go back to reference Jeffreys H. An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci. 1946;186(1007):453–61.ADSMathSciNet Jeffreys H. An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci. 1946;186(1007):453–61.ADSMathSciNet
26.
go back to reference Kass RE. The geometry of asymptotic inference. Stat Sci. 1989;188–219. Kass RE. The geometry of asymptotic inference. Stat Sci. 1989;188–219.
28.
go back to reference Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1984;6:721–41.CrossRefPubMed Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1984;6:721–41.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys. 1953;21(6):1087–92.ADSCrossRef Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys. 1953;21(6):1087–92.ADSCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gilks WR, Best NG, Tan KK. Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling within Gibbs sampling. J R Stat Soc: Ser C (Appl Stat). 1995;44(4):455–72. Gilks WR, Best NG, Tan KK. Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling within Gibbs sampling. J R Stat Soc: Ser C (Appl Stat). 1995;44(4):455–72.
31.
go back to reference Heidelberger P, Welch PD. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Oper Res. 1983;31(6):1109–44.CrossRef Heidelberger P, Welch PD. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Oper Res. 1983;31(6):1109–44.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2002;64(4):583–639.MathSciNetCrossRef Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2002;64(4):583–639.MathSciNetCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lin YK. Hypothesis testing for the Gaussian-Exponential longitudinal model. 2011. Lin YK. Hypothesis testing for the Gaussian-Exponential longitudinal model. 2011.
35.
go back to reference Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman A. R2OpenBUGS: a package for running OpenBUGS from R. J Stat Softw. 2019;31:1109–44. Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman A. R2OpenBUGS: a package for running OpenBUGS from R. J Stat Softw. 2019;31:1109–44.
36.
go back to reference Therneau T, Lumley T. R survival package. 2013. Therneau T, Lumley T. R survival package. 2013.
Metadata
Title
A Bayesian Bernoulli-Exponential joint model for binary longitudinal outcomes and informative time with applications to bladder cancer recurrence data
Author
Michael Safo Oduro
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02160-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2024 Go to the issue