Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2008

01-02-2008 | Original Article

5- to 9-year Survivorship of Single-radius, Posterior-stabilized TKA

Authors: Ormonde M. Mahoney, MD, Tracy L. Kinsey, RN, MSPH

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

We studied 1030 consecutive cemented primary TKAs performed by the primary author (OMM) using a single-radius, posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis with 5 years’ minimum followup to determine whether an accelerated early failure rate was associated with this design. At 5 to 9.5 postoperative years, 32 knees had been revised at an average of 2.4 postoperative years (range, 0.1–8.2 years) because of infection (11), periprosthetic fracture (10), aseptic loosening (eight), stiffness (two), and late hemarthrosis (one). Four had only the tibial insert revised. One-half of all failures occurred within 1.5 years. The cases of aseptic loosening involved the femoral component in one patient, tibial component in five, and both components in two. With only seven patients (0.7%) having unknown outcomes, the overall failure rate was 4.9 per 1000 person-years for the study period. The Kaplan–Meier survivorship using any part of the prosthesis removed or revised for any reason as the end point was 95.8% (95% confidence interval, 93.7%–95.5%), and with aseptic loosening as the end point, it was 98.6% (95% confidence interval, 96.5%–99.4%). The midterm survivorship rates were comparable to those of other posterior-stabilized total condylar designs and are not suggestive of excessive risk of early failure.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alemparte J, Cabezas A, Azocar O, Hernandez R, Acevedo M. Mid-term results of an AGC total knee arthroplasty system survival and function analysis: 2- to 8-year follow-up results. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:420–425.PubMedCrossRef Alemparte J, Cabezas A, Azocar O, Hernandez R, Acevedo M. Mid-term results of an AGC total knee arthroplasty system survival and function analysis: 2- to 8-year follow-up results. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:420–425.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117–124.PubMedCrossRef Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117–124.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Carr AJ, Morris RW, Murray DW, Pynsent PB. Survival analysis in joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:178–182.PubMed Carr AJ, Morris RW, Murray DW, Pynsent PB. Survival analysis in joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:178–182.PubMed
5.
go back to reference D’Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida JC, Mahar A, Colwell CW. Jr. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:213–220.PubMedCrossRef D’Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida JC, Mahar A, Colwell CW. Jr. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:213–220.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79–86.PubMedCrossRef Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79–86.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Forster MC. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:265–270.PubMedCrossRef Forster MC. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:265–270.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:259–268.PubMed Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:259–268.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53;282:457–481. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53;282:457–481.
10.
go back to reference Keating EM, Medding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA. Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:34–39. Keating EM, Medding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA. Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:34–39.
11.
go back to reference Kolisek FR, Barnes CL. Scorpio posterior-stabilized knee system: 5-year clinical and functional results. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1187–1192.PubMedCrossRef Kolisek FR, Barnes CL. Scorpio posterior-stabilized knee system: 5-year clinical and functional results. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1187–1192.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee SY, Matsui N, Kurosaka M, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, Dennis DA, Yoshiya S. A posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty shows condylar lift-off during deep knee bends. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:181–184.PubMedCrossRef Lee SY, Matsui N, Kurosaka M, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, Dennis DA, Yoshiya S. A posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty shows condylar lift-off during deep knee bends. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:181–184.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mahoney O. The subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. In: Hozack WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, Bonutti PM, Rachbauer F, Schaffer JL, Donnelly WJ, eds. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty: New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2004:146–150. Mahoney O. The subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. In: Hozack WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, Bonutti PM, Rachbauer F, Schaffer JL, Donnelly WJ, eds. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty: New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2004:146–150.
14.
go back to reference Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL. Modular femoral offset stems facilitate joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:93–98.PubMedCrossRef Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL. Modular femoral offset stems facilitate joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:93–98.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:416–421.PubMedCrossRef Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:416–421.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pittman GT, Peters CL, Hines JL, Bachus KN. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:883–888.PubMedCrossRef Pittman GT, Peters CL, Hines JL, Bachus KN. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:883–888.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Luessenhop CP, Rodriguez JA. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system: four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate-substituting design. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:342–348.PubMed Ranawat CS, Luessenhop CP, Rodriguez JA. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system: four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate-substituting design. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:342–348.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Schwarzer G, Schumacher M, Maurer TB, Ochsner PE. Statistical analysis of failure times in total joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:997–1003.PubMedCrossRef Schwarzer G, Schumacher M, Maurer TB, Ochsner PE. Statistical analysis of failure times in total joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:997–1003.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Silva M, Kabbash CA, Tiberi JV 3rd, Park SH, Reilly DT, Mahoney OM, Schmalzried TP. Surface damage on open box posterior-stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:135–144.PubMedCrossRef Silva M, Kabbash CA, Tiberi JV 3rd, Park SH, Reilly DT, Mahoney OM, Schmalzried TP. Surface damage on open box posterior-stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:135–144.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sorrells RB, Voorhorst PE, Murphy JA, Bauschka MP, Greenwald AS. Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a five to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2156–2162.PubMed Sorrells RB, Voorhorst PE, Murphy JA, Bauschka MP, Greenwald AS. Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a five to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2156–2162.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20:428–433.CrossRef Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20:428–433.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wang H, Simpson KJ, Ferrara MS, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1193–1199.PubMedCrossRef Wang H, Simpson KJ, Ferrara MS, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1193–1199.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
5- to 9-year Survivorship of Single-radius, Posterior-stabilized TKA
Authors
Ormonde M. Mahoney, MD
Tracy L. Kinsey, RN, MSPH
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0070-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2008 Go to the issue

Original Article

Richard von Volkmann