Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

102 lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies: one surgeon’s learning curve

Authors: Anouar Bourghli, Derek Cawley, Felipe Novoa, Manuela Rey, Abdulmajeed Alzakri, Daniel Larrieu, Jean-Marc Vital, Olivier Gille, Louis Boissiere, Ibrahim Obeid

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO) is an effective surgical technique for the correction of fixed sagittal malalignment of the spine. It is a demanding technique that requires a long learning curve. The aim of this study is to analyze a surgeon’s learning curve for lumbar PSO in relation to the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative management, with assessment of the global outcome.

Materials and methods

102 patients operated over an 8-year period were included, distributed in 3 groups over the time, and retrospectively analyzed. The following data were collected: demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative radiological parameters, operative technical details, and complications. Multiple regression analysis was performed, and while the number of cases was the predictor, other variables such as demographic, radiographical, and surgical variables were considered as a covariate in the final model.

Results

When comparing the first group and the last group of patients, the mean surgical time had decreased by 50 min, the estimated blood loss was decreased by 655 ml, and a significant decrease in dural tear occurrence was noticed. In addition, we found a significant decrease in the hospital stay length. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that when the surgeon’s experience doubles, the operative time decreases by 29 min, the blood loss by 281 ml, and the odds of hospital stay ≥ 21 days decrease by 0.66 times.

Conclusion

PSO technique has a relatively long learning curve. This study showed that accumulating the experience over the years, while performing cases on a regular basis, is definitely the key in mastering this complex and risky technique, with significant improvements in the perioperative parameters that directly impact the recovery and global outcome.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Liu S, Schwab F, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Ames CP, Mundis G, Hostin R, Kebaish K, Deviren V, Gupta M, Boachie-Adjei O, Hart RA, Bess S, Lafage V (2014) Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment. The Ochsner journal 14:67–77PubMedPubMedCentral Liu S, Schwab F, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Ames CP, Mundis G, Hostin R, Kebaish K, Deviren V, Gupta M, Boachie-Adjei O, Hart RA, Bess S, Lafage V (2014) Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment. The Ochsner journal 14:67–77PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029CrossRefPubMed Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Maier S, Smith JS, Schwab F, Obeid I, Mundis G, Klineberg E, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Boachie-Adjei O, Gupta M, Ames C, Protopsaltis T, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2014) Revision surgery after three-column osteotomy in 335 adult spinal deformity patients: inter-center variability and risk factors. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000304 PubMed Maier S, Smith JS, Schwab F, Obeid I, Mundis G, Klineberg E, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Boachie-Adjei O, Gupta M, Ames C, Protopsaltis T, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2014) Revision surgery after three-column osteotomy in 335 adult spinal deformity patients: inter-center variability and risk factors. Spine. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​brs.​0000000000000304​ PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2001) Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess 5:1–79CrossRefPubMed Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2001) Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess 5:1–79CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fu V (1999) Estimating generalized ordered logit models. Stata Tech Bull 8(44) Fu V (1999) Estimating generalized ordered logit models. Stata Tech Bull 8(44)
Metadata
Title
102 lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies: one surgeon’s learning curve
Authors
Anouar Bourghli
Derek Cawley
Felipe Novoa
Manuela Rey
Abdulmajeed Alzakri
Daniel Larrieu
Jean-Marc Vital
Olivier Gille
Louis Boissiere
Ibrahim Obeid
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5481-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

European Spine Journal 3/2018 Go to the issue

Editorial

Editorial