Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine 4/2013

01-06-2013 | CE - THE CUTTING EDGE: RESEARCH UPDATE

0.9 % Saline vs 6 % HES 130/0.4 for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients

Authors: Giulia Nenna, Giorgio Costantino

Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

The administration of colloids, and hydroxyehtyl starch (HES) in particular, in critically ill patients has been questioned by several studies, with different conclusions regarding outcomes and kidney injury. Older HES solutions have been shown to correlate significantly with acute kidney injury [1], but the question remains open for newer, lower molecular weight and lower MS preparations (tetrastarches). Recently, a Scandinavian trial has reported that 6 % HES 130/0.42 significantly increased mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock [2]. To further assess safety and efficacy of HES solutions, the CHEST investigators have conducted a large-scale trial comparing 6 % HES 130/0.40 (Voluven) to normal saline in ICU patients. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F et al (2008) Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 358:125–139PubMedCrossRef Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F et al (2008) Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 358:125–139PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, et al (2012) Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 367:124–134 [(2012) Erratum. N Engl J Med 367:481] Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, et al (2012) Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 367:124–134 [(2012) Erratum. N Engl J Med 367:481]
3.
go back to reference Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST) Management Committee (2011) The Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial: protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of fluid resuscitation with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) compared to 0.9 % sodium chloride (saline) in intensive care patients on mortality. Intensive Care Med 37:816–823CrossRef Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST) Management Committee (2011) The Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial: protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of fluid resuscitation with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) compared to 0.9 % sodium chloride (saline) in intensive care patients on mortality. Intensive Care Med 37:816–823CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Myburgh J, Li Q, Heritier S, Dan A, Glass P (2012) Statistical analysis plan for the Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST). Crit Care Resusc 14:44–52 [(2012) Erratum. Crit Care Resusc 14:164.] Myburgh J, Li Q, Heritier S, Dan A, Glass P (2012) Statistical analysis plan for the Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST). Crit Care Resusc 14:44–52 [(2012) Erratum. Crit Care Resusc 14:164.]
5.
go back to reference Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T et al (2012) Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6 % hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9 % NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care 16(3):R94PubMedCrossRef Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T et al (2012) Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6 % hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9 % NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care 16(3):R94PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference James MF, Michell WL, Joubert IA, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH, Gillespie RS (2011) Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (fluids in resuscitation of severe trauma). Br J Anaesth 107:693–702PubMedCrossRef James MF, Michell WL, Joubert IA, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH, Gillespie RS (2011) Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (fluids in resuscitation of severe trauma). Br J Anaesth 107:693–702PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
0.9 % Saline vs 6 % HES 130/0.4 for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients
Authors
Giulia Nenna
Giorgio Costantino
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1828-0447
Electronic ISSN: 1970-9366
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-013-0938-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Internal and Emergency Medicine 4/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine