skip to main content
10.1145/1900441.1900476acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design

Published:29 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The field of Participatory Design (PD) has grown rapidly over the last 20 to 30 years. For more than two decades non-designers have been increasingly involved in various design activities through a large number of participatory design projects all over the world. The project aims in PD have developed from being mainly about ICT development to today include, for instance, space design, product development, industrial design, architecture, service- and transformation design. As every project is unique, it is necessary to decide which design approach(es), methods, tools and techniques to use in a specific project. Thus many practices for how to involve people in designing have been used and developed during the years. There is some confusion as to which tools and techniques to use, when, and for what purpose. Therefore we are proposing a framework to help organize the proliferation of tools, techniques and methods in hopes that the PD community will benefit by discussing relevant applications and identifying potential areas for further exploration.

References

  1. Binder, T. and Brandt, E. (2008). The Design: Lab as platform in participatory design research. In Binder, Brandt and Gregory (Eds.), CoDesign, International Journal of CoDesign in Design and the Arts. Volume 4 Number 2, June 2008. Pp. 115--129. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandt, E. (2006) Designing exploratory design games. PDC: Expanding Boundaries in Design. Trento, Italy, Volume 1, pp. 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brereton, M. and Buur, J. (2008) New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing. CoDesign, 4(2), 101--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Buur, J. and Bødker, S. (2000) From usability lab to "design collaboratorium" DIS: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, New York City, pp. 297--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Falköping, Sweden: Arbetslivcentrum/Almqvist and Wiksell International. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Goodell, H. Kuhn, S. Maulsby, D. and Traynor, C (1999) End user programming/informal programming, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, Volume 31, Issue 4, October 1999, pp. 17--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Greenbaum, J., and Kyng, M. (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kensing, F., and Munk-Madsen, A. (1993). PD: Structure in the toolbox. Communications of the ACM 36(6), 78--85 (June 1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mattelmäki, T (2006) Design probes. DA Dissertation. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Muller, M. J., White, E. A., and Wildman, D. M. (1993). Taxonomy of PD practices: A brief practitioner's guide. Communications of the ACM 36(6), 26--28 (June 1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Muller, M. J. (2007) Participatory design: The third space in HCI (revised). In J. Jacko and A. Sears (eds.), Handbook of HCI 2nd Edition. Mahway NJ USA: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanders, E. (2008). An evolving map of design practices and design research. In Interactions -- experiences, people, technology. ACM. Volume XV.6 November + December 2008, p. 13--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Schuler, D., and Namioka, A. (1993) (Eds.). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale NJ USA: Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Westerlund, B (2009) Design space exploration: Co-operative creation of proposals for desired interactions with future artefacts. Ph.D. Thesis, Human-Computer Interaction, Stockholm: KTH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference
    November 2010
    314 pages
    ISBN:9781450301312
    DOI:10.1145/1900441

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader