Jacob Buur
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an exploratory process in which three industrial usability groups, in cooperation with HCI researchers, worked to reframe their own work practice. The usability groups moved beyond a classical usability setting towards a new way of working which we have coined the Design Collaboratorium. This design collaboratorium is a design approach that creates an open physical and organizational space where design?ers, engineers, users and usability professionals meet and work alongside each other. At the same time the design collaboratorium makes use of event-driven ways of working known from participatory design. Some of these working methods are well-documented from literature but adapted to the needs of the particular project, others are new. This paper illustrates how it is pos?sible to reframe usability work and it discusses the new usability competence required.
- 1.Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems San Francisco Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Binder, T., Brandt, E., Horgen, T. and Zach, G. Staging Events of Collaborative Design, Concurrent Engineering, Tokyo 1998.Google Scholar
- 3.Binder, T. Setting the Stage for Improvised Video Scenarios. In CHI'99 Extended Abstracts (Pittsburgh PA. May 1999) ACM Press, 1999, pp. 230-231. Google Scholar
- 4.Buur, J and Bagger, K. Replacing Usability Testing with User Dialogue. Communications of the A CM, 42, 5, May 1999, pp. 63-66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Baerentsen, K and Slavensky, H. A contribution to the Design Process. Communications of the A CM, 42, 5, May 1999, pp. 73-77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Bodker, S. and Graves Petersen, M. (submitted for publication). Design for learning in use. Special Issue of Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, in preparation. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Bodker, S. and Halskov Madsen, K. Context- an active choice in usability work, Interactions, July+August 1998, pp. 17-25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Bodker, S. & Gronbaek, K. Design in Action: From Prototyping by Demonstration to Cooperative Prototyping. In Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (Eds.). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 197-218, 1991 Google Scholar
- 9.Bodker, S. & Gronbaek K. Users and Designers in Mutual Activity- an analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In Engestr6m, Y. & Middleton D. (Eds.). Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, pp. 130-158, 1996.Google Scholar
- 10.Bodker, S. and Christiansen, E. Scenarios as springboards in design. In Bowker, G., Gasser, L., Star, S. L. and Turner, W. (eds.). Social science research, technical systems and cooperative work, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum pp. 217-234, 1997.Google Scholar
- 11.Bodker, S. Scenarios in user-centred design - setting the stage for reflection and action. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 32. CD-ROM. Version to appear in Interacting with Computers, 1999a Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Bodker, S. Computer applications as mediators of design and use - a developmental perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, 1999bGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bodker, S. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems design, Human Computer Interaction 11(3), 215-236, 1996. An earlier version in Trigg R., Irwing Anderson, S., & Dykstra- Eriksson, E. (Eds.) (1994). Proceedings of PDC '94, pp. 13-20.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Engestr6m, Y. Learning by expanding. Orienta- Konsultit, Helsinki, 1987.Google Scholar
- 15.Gardner; J. Strengthening the focus on users' working practices; Communications of the A CM, 42, 5, May 1999, pp. 79-82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds.). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Gronbaek, K., Grudin, J., Bodker, S. & Bannon, L. Achieving Cooperative System Design - shifting from product to process focus. In Namioka, A. & Schuler, D. (Eds.). Participatory Design: Perspectives of Systems Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 79-98, 1993.Google Scholar
- 18.Karat, J. and Bennett, J. Using scenarios in design meetings, A case study example. In Karat, J. (ed.). Taking software design seriously: Practical techniques for human-computer interaction design, Boston: Academic Press, 1991, pp. 63-94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Kaasgaard, K., Myhlendorph, T., Snitker, T., and Sorensen, H.E. Remote Usability Testing of a Web Site Information Architecture: "Testing for a Dollar a Day", Brewster, S. Cawsey, A. and Cockton, G. (eds.) Human- Computer Interaction - INTERACT'99 (Volume II), IFIP, 1999, pp. 443-450.Google Scholar
- 20.Lanzara, G.F. & Mathiassen, L. Mapping situations within a system development project, Information Management 8(1), 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Madsen K.H. and Borgholm, T. Cooperative Usability Practices. Communications of the A CM, 42, 5, May 1999, pp. 91-97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Madsen, K.H. and Petersen M.G. Reflections on three design sessions, Brewster, S. Cawsey, A. and Cockton, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'99 (Volume II), IFIP, 1999, pp 185-190.Google Scholar
- 23.Mogensen, P., & Trigg, R. Artifacts as triggers for participatory analysis. In Kuhn, S. Muller, M. & Meskill, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC). Boston, MA, 1992, pp. 55- 62.Google Scholar
- 24.Muller, M, Haslwanter, J.H., Dayton, T. Participatory practices in the software lifecycle, in Helanden, M., Landauer, T & Prabdu, P., Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, North Holland Amsterdam, pp. 955-298, 1998.Google Scholar
- 25.Nielsen, C. Testing in the Field. Proceedings of APCHI 98, IEEE Press, 1998, pp. 285-290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.Sch6n D. A. The Reflective Practitioner- How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
- 27.Star, S. L. The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Gasser, L. & Huhns, M. (eds.) Distributed artificial intelligence, vol. 2, London: Pitman, 1989, pp. 37-54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. Computerization and women's knowledge, in Tijdens, K, Jennings, M., Wagner, I, Weggelaar, M., Women Work and Computerization. Forming new alliances, North Holland, 1989, pp. 153-160.Google Scholar
- 29.Timpka, T. & Sj6berg, C. Voices in design: The dynamics of participatory information systems, Trigg, R., Anderson, S.I. & Dykstra-Ericson, E. PDC'94: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Palo Alto, CA: CPSR/ACM, 1994, pp. 75-86,Google Scholar
- 30.Trigg, R., Bodker, S. & Gronbaek, K. A Video-based Analysis of the Cooperative Prototyping Process. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 1991, vol. 3, pp. 63-86. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- From usability lab to “design collaboratorium”: reframing usability practice
Recommendations
Culturally Compatible Usability Work: An Interpretive Case Study on the Relationship between Usability Work and Its Cultural Context in Software Product Development Organizations
This paper analyzes how organizational culture is intertwined with usability work in software SW development organizations. Usability is an important quality characteristic of software products and systems. However, the development of usability is ...
The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design
The "design collaboratorium" is a new usability practice that has been developed in an action research project between three industrial usability labs and a university. The design collaboratorium has been developed as a reaction to the failing ...
Design practice and interface usability: Evidence from interviews with designers
CHI '83: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsResearch into human-computer interaction (HCI) is mainly conducted by engineering psychologists, cognitive psychologists and computer scientists. The principal consumers of applied HCI research, on the other hand, are human factors practitioners and ...
Comments