skip to main content
10.3115/990820.990851dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

An empirical investigation of the relation between discourse structure and co-reference

Published:31 July 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

We compare the potential of two classes of linear and hierarchical models of discourse to determine co-reference links and resolve anaphors. The comparison uses a corpus of thirty texts, which were manually annotated for co-reference and discourse structure.

References

  1. Saliha Azzam, Kevin Humphreys, and Robert Gaizauskas. 1998. Evaluating a focus-based approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL '98), pages 74--78, Montreal, Canada, August 10--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dan Cristea, Nancy Ide, and Laurent Romary. 1998. Veins theory: A model of global discourse cohesion and coherence. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL '98), pages 281--285, Montreal, Canada, August. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barbara Fox. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics; 48. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Niyu Ge, John Hale, and Eugene Charniak. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 161--170, Montreal, Canada, August 15--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbara J. Grosz and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175--204, July-September. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203--226, June. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lynette Hirschman and Nancy Chinchor, 1997. MUC-7 Coreference Task Definition, July 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Janet Hitzeman and Massimo Poesio. 1998. Long distance pronominalization and global focus. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL '98), pages 550--556, Montreal, Canada, August. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jerry H. Hobbs. 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44:311--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Megumi Kameyama. 1997. Recognizing referential links: An information extraction perspective. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL '97 Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution, pages 46--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shalom Lappin and Herbert J. Leass. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Daniel Marcu, Estibaliz Amorrortu, and Magdalena Romera. 1999. Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. In Proceedings of the ACL '99 Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, pages 48--57, University of Maryland, June 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruslan Mitkov. 1997. Factors in anaphora resolution: They are not the only things that matter. a case study based on two different approaches. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL '97 Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution, pages 14--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Candace L. Sidner. 1981. Focusing for interpretation of pronouns. Computational Linguistics, 7(4):217--231, October-December. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wietske Vonk, Lettica G. M. M. Hustinx, and Wim H. G. Simons. 1992. The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7(3, 4):301--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. An empirical investigation of the relation between discourse structure and co-reference

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image DL Hosted proceedings
      COLING '00: Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
      July 2000
      616 pages
      ISBN:155860717X

      Publisher

      Association for Computational Linguistics

      United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 July 2000

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader