Masamichi Takahashi
Abstract
In this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method of classifying participants including lurkers based on two criteria: what types of actions they take outside the online community, and whether or not the online community affects their thoughts. We conduct a questionnaire survey of all participants in two in-house online communities to verify our method. There are a considerable number of lurkers who have a strong and wide influence outside the online community. We conclude that such lurkers cannot be neglected in an evaluation of online communities within a company. These results could also lead us to discuss a possibility of an online community management by focusing on not only posters but also lurkers who are indirect contributors to increasing the influence of an online community on its outside environment.
- Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. In Good Company. How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work, Boston, MA., Harvard Business School Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group, In Proceedings of CHI 92, Monterey, California, 1992, 541--547. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holeton, R. Wired Frosh, available at http://www.stanford.edu/holeton/wired-frosh/index.html, 1997.Google Scholar
- Kollock, P. and Smith, M. Managing the Virtual Commons: Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities, In Proceedings of Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996, 109--128.Google Scholar
- Mason, B. Issues in Virtual Ethnography, In Proceedings of Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments: lnhabited Information Spaces and Connected Communities, Edinburgh, 1999, 61--69.Google Scholar
- Nonnecke, B. Lurking in Email-based Discussion Lists, a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of South Bank University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, March, 2000.Google Scholar
- Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent, In Proceedings of CHI 2000, The Hague, 2000, 73--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. Why Lurkers Lurk, Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2001.Google Scholar
- Perkins, J. and Newman, K. Two Archetypes in E-discourse: Lurkers and Virtuosos, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2, 2--3, 1996, 155--170.Google Scholar
- Preece, J. Supporting Community and Building Social Capital, Communications of the ACM, 45, 4, 2002, 37--39.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. A. and Fiore, A. T. Visualization Components for Persistent Conversations, In Proceedings of CHI 2001, Seattle, Washington, 2001, 136--143. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Takahashi, M., Kitayama, S. and Kaneko, I. Measuring and Visualizing Organizational Awareness of Network Communities, Information Processing Society of Japan Journal, Vol. 40, No. 11 (In Japanese), 1999.Google Scholar
- The KNOW Network, available at http://www.knowledgebusiness.com.Google Scholar
- Willett, J. VECO - an Online Community Making a Difference, an Evaluation of the Project, Australian Student Traineeship Foundation and Dusseldorp Skills Forum, Sydney, 1998.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The active lurker: a new viewpoint for evaluating the influence of an in-house online community
Recommendations
The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment
GROUP '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkIn this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method of classifying participants including lurkers based on two ...
Lurker demographics: counting the silent
CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAs online groups grow in number and type, understanding lurking is becoming increasingly important. Recent reports indicate that lurkers make up over 90% of online groups, yet little is known about them.
This paper presents a demographic study of lurking ...
The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment[1] (abstract only)
In this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method of classifying participants including lurkers based on two ...
Comments