skip to main content
10.1145/3627631.3627653acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

An Algorithm to Calculate Retinal Vessel Diameter in Fundus Images

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Retinal blood vessels are the arteries and veins that supply blood to the human eye. Fundus images obtained through a fundus camera capture retinal information like, the macula, optic disc, cup, fovea, retinal blood vessels, and abnormalities. The retinal blood vessels are miniature and are usually measured in micrometers. It is difficult and time-consuming to study retinal vessels from a fundus image. Generally, a detailed vessel study requires costly equipment like Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT) and is comparatively less available at hospitals than a fundus camera. Blood vessels are connected throughout the body. Studying retinal blood vessel health can help ophthalmologists and doctors understand the overall health of blood vessels across the body non-invasively. Narrowing of blood vessels can make a person prone to many diseases, like hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. A few methods aim to automate the task using Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD). The work proposes a novel and relatively less complex algorithm for calculating the diameter of a given retinal blood vessel at a given distance from the optic disc center in a fundus image. The approach aims to compute the artery-to-vein diameter ratio of retinal blood vessels at a given distance from the center of the optic disc. The proposed method has been tested on the LES-AV 2020 dataset and it achieved an approximate artery-to-vein diameter ratio (AVR) of 2:3, which is in line with the average healthy AVR in the literature. Therefore, the proposed method is accurate and can be extended to find AVR in various clinical scenarios to detect and study any abnormalities.

References

  1. Alauddin Bhuiyan, Baikunth Nath, and Kotagiri Ramamohanarao. 2012. Detection and classification of bifurcation and branch points on retinal vascular network. In 2012 International Conference on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications (DICTA). IEEE, Australia, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dragana Drobnjak, Inger Christine Munch, Charlotte Glümer, Kristine Færch, Line Kessel, Michael Larsen, and Nina CBB Veiby. 2017. Relationship between retinal vessel diameters and retinopathy in the Inter99 Eye Study. Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology 8 (2017), 22–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Abdolhossein Fathi and Ahmad Reza Naghsh-Nilchi. 2013. Automatic wavelet-based retinal blood vessels segmentation and vessel diameter estimation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 8, 1 (2013), 71–80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M Dominik Fischer, Gesine Huber, Yuxi Feng, Naoyuki Tanimoto, Regine Mühlfriedel, Susanne C Beck, Eric Tröger, Christoph Kernstock, Markus N Preising, Birgit Lorenz, 2010. In vivo assessment of retinal vascular wall dimensions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 51, 10 (2010), 5254–5259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kenneth H Fritzsche. 2002. Computer vision algorithms for retinal vessel width change detection and quantification. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Henner Hanssen, Lukas Streese, and Walthard Vilser. 2022. Retinal vessel diameters and function in cardiovascular risk and disease. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research Online, In Press, Corrected Proof (2022), 101095.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Amanda D Henderson, Beau B Bruce, Nancy J Newman, and Valérie Biousse. 2011. Hypertension-related eye abnormalities and the risk of stroke. Reviews in neurological diseases 8, 1-2 (2011), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. NORMAN M KEITH, HENRY P WAGENER, and NELSON W BARKER. 1974. Some different types of essential hypertension: their course and prognosis. The American journal of the medical sciences 268, 6 (1974), 336–345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shaohua Li, Xiuchao Sui, Xiangde Luo, Xinxing Xu, Yong Liu, and Rick Goh. 2021. Medical image segmentation using squeeze-and-expansion transformers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jose A Maderuelo-Fernandez, Angel Garcia-Garcia, Pablo Chamoso, José I Recio-Rodríguez, Sara Rodríguez-González, Maria C Patino-Alonso, Emiliano Rodriguez-Sanchez, Juan M Corchado-Rodríguez, Manuel A Gómez-Marcos, Luis García-Ortiz, 2020. Automatic image analyser to assess retinal vessel calibre (ALTAIR). A new tool to evaluate the thickness, area and length of the vessels of the retina. International Journal of Medical Informatics 136 (2020), 104090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Meindert Niemeijer, Xiayu Xu, Alina V Dumitrescu, Priya Gupta, Bram Van Ginneken, James C Folk, and Michael D Abramoff. 2011. Automated measurement of the arteriolar-to-venular width ratio in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 30, 11 (2011), 1941–1950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. José Ignacio Orlando, João Barbosa–Breda, Karel Van Keer, Matthew B. Blaschko, Pablo Javier Blanco, and Carlos Alberto Bulant. 2020. LES-AV dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11857698.v1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. José Ignacio Orlando, Huazhu Fu, João Barbosa Breda, Karel van Keer, Deepti R Bathula, Andrés Diaz-Pinto, Ruogu Fang, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jeyoung Kim, JoonHo Lee, 2020. Refuge challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs. Medical image analysis 59 (2020), 101570.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Helena M Pakter, Elton Ferlin, Sandra C Fuchs, Marcelo K Maestri, Ruy S Moraes, Gerson Nunes, Leila B Moreira, Miguel Gus, and Flávio D Fuchs. 2005. Measuring arteriolar-to-venous ratio in retinal photography of patients with hypertension: development and application of a new semi-automated method. American journal of hypertension 18, 3 (2005), 417–421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mariusz Paradowski, Urszula Markowska-Kaczmar, Halina Kwasnicka, and Krzysztof Borysewicz. 2009. Capillary abnormalities detection using vessel thickness and curvature analysis. In International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, Chile, 151–158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pranjal Rai, Sachin Jangir, and Tanvir Singh Bal. 2020. Device for ECG prediction based on retinal vasculature analysis., arXiv–2009 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhi Da Soh, Miao Li Chee, Sahil Thakur, Yih Chung Tham, Yijin Tao, Zhi Wei Lim, Baskaran Mani, Tina T Wong, Tin Aung, and Ching-Yu Cheng. 2020. Asian-specific vertical cup-to-disc ratio cut-off for glaucoma screening: An evidence-based recommendation from a multi-ethnic Asian population. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 48, 9 (2020), 1210–1218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. NL Stokoe and RW Turner. 1966. Normal retinal vascular pattern. Arteriovenous ratio as a measure of arterial calibre.The British journal of ophthalmology 50, 1 (1966), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S Sukanya, S Abinaya, and D Tamilselvi. 2014. Detection of blood vessels and measurement of vessel width for diabetic retinopathy. Computer Science & Information Technology 4 (2014), 233–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kees M van Hespen, Jaco JM Zwanenburg, Jeroen Hendrikse, and Hugo J Kuijf. 2021. Subvoxel vessel wall thickness measurements of the intracranial arteries using a convolutional neural network. Medical Image Analysis 67 (2021), 101818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shujun Wang, Lequan Yu, Xin Yang, Chi-Wing Fu, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2019. Patch-based output space adversarial learning for joint optic disc and cup segmentation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 38, 11 (2019), 2485–2495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Tien Yin Wong, FM Amirul Islam, Ronald Klein, Barbara EK Klein, Mary Frances Cotch, Cecilia Castro, A Richey Sharrett, and Eyal Shahar. 2006. Retinal vascular caliber, cardiovascular risk factors, and inflammation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 47, 6 (2006), 2341–2350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xide Xia and Brian Kulis. 2017. W-Net: A Deep Model for Fully Unsupervised Image Segmentation. arxiv:1711.08506 [cs.CV]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiayu Xu, Wenxiang Ding, Michael D Abràmoff, and Ruofan Cao. 2017. An improved arteriovenous classification method for the early diagnostics of various diseases in retinal image. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 141 (2017), 3–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Algorithm to Calculate Retinal Vessel Diameter in Fundus Images

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICVGIP '23: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
            December 2023
            352 pages
            ISBN:9798400716256
            DOI:10.1145/3627631

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 31 January 2024

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format