skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858313acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present five provocations for ethics, and ethical research, in HCI. We discuss, in turn, informed consent, the researcher-participant power differential, presentation of data in publications, the role of ethical review boards, and, lastly, corporate-facilitated projects. By pointing to unintended consequences of regulation and oversimplifications of unresolvable moral conflicts, we propose these provocations not as guidelines or recommendations but as instruments for challenging our views on what it means to do ethical research in HCI. We then suggest an alternative grounded in the sensitivities of those being studied and based on everyday practice and judgement, rather than one driven by bureaucratic, legal, or philosophical concerns. In conclusion, we call for a wider and more practical discussion on ethics within the community, and suggest that we should be more supportive of low-risk ethical experimentation to further the field.

References

  1. 1992. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Retrieved 22/07/2015 from http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethicsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 1969. The Chilling Effect in Constitutional Law. Columbia Law Review, 69 (5). 808--842. DOI: 10.2307/1121147Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. George J Annas and Michael A Grodin. 1995. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. The Journal of Pharmacy & Law, 4. 167--245. DOI: 10.1017/S0250569X00020380Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI: Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. Morgan & Claypool.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Elizabeth H Bassett and Kate O'Riordan. 2002. Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4 (3). 233--247. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021319125207 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Howard S Becker. 1995. Moral entrepreneurs: The creation and enforcement of deviant categories. in (Herman, N.J. ed.). Deviance: A symbolic interactionist approach, AltaMira Press, 169--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Bob Anderson, Rachel Jacobs, Mike Golembewski, Marina Jirotka, Bernd Carsten Stahl, Job Timmermans, Gabriella Giannachi and Matt Adams. 2015. The Ethical Implications of HCI's Turn to the Cultural. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22 (5). 24. DOI: 10.1145/2775107 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tom Boellstorff, Bonnie Nardi and Celia Pearce. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Danah Boyd. 2014. It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Stacy M Branham, Anja Thieme, Lisa P Nathan, Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Cocreating & identity-making in CSCW: revisiting ethics in design research. in Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, ACM, Baltimore, MD, USA, 305--308. DOI: 10.1145/2556420.2558859 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Amy Bruckman, Karrie Karahalios, Robert E Kraut, Erika Shehan Poole, John C Thomas and Sarita Yardi. 2010. Revisiting research ethics in the facebook era: Challenges in emerging CSCW research. in Adjunct Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ACM, Savannah, GAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrie R Cassileth, Robert V Zupkis, Katherine SuttonSmith and Vicki March. 1980. Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized? The New England journal of medicine, 302 (16). 896--900. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198004173021605Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stanley. Cavell. 1969. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Matthew Chalmers, Donald McMillan, Alistair Morrison, Henriette Cramer, Mattias Rost and Wendy Mackay. 2011. Ethics, logs and videotape: ethics in large scale user trials and user generated content. in CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2421--2424. DOI: 10.1145/1979742.1979574 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pia Christensen and Alan Prout. 2002. Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9 (4). 477--497. DOI: 10.1177/0907568202009004007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tom Clark. 2008. We're Over-Researched Here!' Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology, 42 (5). 953--970. DOI: 10.1177/0038038508094573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sonia Mansoldo Dainesi and Moisés Goldbaum. 2011. Provision of investigational drug after clinical research: review of literature, national and international guidelines. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 57 (6). 710--716. DOI: 10.1590/S0104--42302011000600021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Robert Dingwall. 2008. The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 3 (1). 1--12. DOI: 10.1080/17450140701749189Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell Duneier and Ovie Carter. 1999. Sidewalk. Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Charles Ess. 2002. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Casey Fiesler, Alyson Young, Tamara Peyton, Amy S. Bruckman, Mary Gray, Jeff Hancock and Wayne Lutters. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 289--292. DOI: 10.1145/2685553.2685558 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jennifer Golbeck. 2014. What a Toilet Hoax Can Tell Us About the Future of Surveillance. Retrieved 20/08/2015 from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/04/what-a-toilet-hoax-can-tell-us-about-the-future-ofsurveillance/361408/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael Goodyear. 2009. Medical research for hire: The political economy of pharmaceutical clinical trials. JAMA, 302 (23). 2603--2603. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Marilys Guillemin and Lynn Gillam. 2004. Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments" in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (2). 261--280. DOI: 10.1177/1077800403262360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kevin D Haggerty. 2004. Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27 (4). 391--414. DOI: 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jeff T Hancock. 2015. The Facebook Study: A Personal Account of Data Science, Ethics and Change. in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1--1. DOI: 10.1145/2675133.2697078 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jay Katz. 1994. Informed Consent - Must it remain a fairy tale. Journal of Contemporary Health, Law & Policy, 10. 69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jay Katz. 1977. Informed Consent-A Fairy Tale? Law's Vision. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 39(2). 137--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jofish Kaye, Janet Vertesi, Jennifer Ferreira, Barry Brown and Mark Perry. 2014. #CHImoney: financial interactions, digital cash, capital exchange and mobile money. in CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 111--114. DOI: 10.1145/2559206.2559221 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Brian Keegan. 2015. Research in the Time of Technopanics. in CSCW 2015 Workshop on Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Adam DI Kramer, Jamie E Guillory and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massivescale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (24). 8788--8790. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Michael Lempert. 2013. No ordinary ethics. Anthropological Theory, 13 (4). 370--393. DOI: 10.1177/1463499613505571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kevin Lewis, Jason Kaufman, Marco Gonzalez, Andreas Wimmer and Nicholas Christakis. 2008. Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook. com. Social Networks, 30 (4). 330--342. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wendy E Mackay. 1995. Ethics, lies and videotape?. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Denver, CO, USA, 138145. DOI: 10.1145/223904.223922 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Annette Markham and E Buchanan. 2012. Ethical decision-making and Internet research (version 2.0): Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Heidi A McKee and James E Porter. 2009. The ethics of Internet research: A rhetorical, case-based process. Peter Lang. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Donald McMillan, Alistair Morrison and Matthew Chalmers. 2013. Categorised ethical guidelines for large scale mobile HCI. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Paris, France, 1853--1862. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466245 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Seoul, South Korea, 105--114. DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702481 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Arvind Narayanan and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2008. Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets. in Security and Privacy, 2008. SP 2008. IEEE Symposium on, IEEE, 111--125. DOI: 10.1109/SP.2008.33 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Geoff Pearson. 2009. The researcher as hooligan: where 'participant' observation means breaking the law. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12 (3). 243--255. DOI: 10.1080/13645570701804250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Lydia Plowman, Yvonne Rogers and Magnus Ramage. 1995. What Are Workplace Studies For? in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW '95, Springer Netherlands, 309--324. DOI: 10.1007/978--94-011-03497_20 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Carl Schneider. 2015. The Censor's Hand: The Misregulation of Human-Subject Research. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Natasha Dow Schüll. 2012. Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Eric Benjamin Seufert. 2013. Freemium Economics: Leveraging Analytics and User Segmentation to Drive Revenue. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Malin Sveningsson. 2004. Ethics in Internet ethnography. in (Buchanan, E.A. ed.). Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies, IGI Global, 45--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Latanya Sweeney. 2002. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10 (05). 557570. DOI: 10.1142/S0218488502001648 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Heli K Väätäjä and Emilia K Pesonen. 2013. Ethical issues and guidelines when conducting HCI studies with animals. in CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Paris, France, 2159--2168. DOI: 10.1145/2468356.2468736 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Willy Carl Van den Hoonaard. 2011. The seduction of ethics: Transforming the social sciences. University of Toronto Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Alexandra Weilenmann, Thomas Hillman and Beata Jungselius. 2013. Instagram at the museum: communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Paris, France, 1843--1852. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466243 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Michael Zimmer. 2010. "But the data is already public": on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and information technology, 12 (4). 313--325. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-010--9227--5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader