skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2662002acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploiting Geographical Neighborhood Characteristics for Location Recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Geographical characteristics derived from the historical check-in data have been reported effective in improving location recommendation accuracy. However, previous studies mainly exploit geographical characteristics from a user's perspective, via modeling the geographical distribution of each individual user's check-ins. In this paper, we are interested in exploiting geographical characteristics from a location perspective, by modeling the geographical neighborhood of a location. The neighborhood is modeled at two levels: the instance-level neighborhood defined by a few nearest neighbors of the location, and the region-level neighborhood for the geographical region where the location exists. We propose a novel recommendation approach, namely Instance-Region Neighborhood Matrix Factorization (IRenMF), which exploits two levels of geographical neighborhood characteristics: a) instance-level characteristics, i.e., nearest neighboring locations tend to share more similar user preferences; and b) region-level characteristics, i.e., locations in the same geographical region may share similar user preferences. In IRenMF, the two levels of geographical characteristics are naturally incorporated into the learning of latent features of users and locations, so that IRenMF predicts users' preferences on locations more accurately. Extensive experiments on the real data collected from Gowalla, a popular LBSN, demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of our approach.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. TKDE, 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Bao, Y. Zheng, and M. F. Mokbel. Location-based and preference-aware recommendation using sparse geo-social networking data. In ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Cheng, H. Yang, I. King, and M. Lyu. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. AAAI, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Cranshaw, R. Schwartz, J. Hong, and N. Sadeh. The livehoods project: Utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city. ICWSM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Das, D. Mayur, and A. Garg. Google News Personalization: Scalable Online Collaborative Filtering. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, and J. Franklin. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference and prediction. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Hu, A. Sun, and Y. Liu. Your neighbors affect your ratings: on geographical neighborhood influence to rating prediction. In SIGIR, pages 345--354. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Hu, F. Park, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets. In ICDM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Huang and T. Zhang. The benefit of group sparsity. The Annals of Statistics, 38(4):1978--2004, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Huang, T. Zhang, and D. Metaxas. Learning with structured sparsity. ICML, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Jacob, G. Obozinski, and J.-P. Vert. Group lasso with overlap and graph lasso. In ICML, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Jenatton, G. Obozinski, and F. Bach. Structured sparse principal component analysis. In AISTATS, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Kim and E. P. Xing. Tree-guided group lasso for multi-task regression with structured sparsity. In ICML, pages 543--550, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Kolar, L. Song, and E. P. Xing. Sparsistent learning of varying-coefficient models with structural changes. In NIPS, pages 1006--1014, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. J. Levandoski, M. Sarwat, A. Eldawy, and M. F. Mokbel. Lars: A location-aware recommender system. In ICDE, pages 450--461. IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Yao, and H. Xiong. Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In KDD, pages 1043--1051. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, Y. Weiss, et al. On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. NIPS, 2:849--856, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Pan, Y. Zhou, B. Cao, and N. N. Liu. One-Class Collaborative Filtering. In ICDM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Pradel, S. Sean, and N. Usunier. A case study in a recommender system based on purchase data categories and subject descriptors. In KDD, pages 377--385, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-thieme. BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In UAI, pages 452--461, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW, pages 285--295. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Scellato, A. Noulas, and C. Mascolo. Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In KDD, pages 1046--1054, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. K.-C. Toh and S. Yun. An accelerated proximal gradient algorithm for nuclear norm regularized linear least squares problems. Pacific J. Optimization, pages 615--640, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. Wang, M. Terrovitis, and N. Mamoulis. Location recommendation in location-based social networks using user check-in data. In ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS, pages 364--373. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Ye, P. Yin, and W. Lee. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 325--334, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M. Ye, P. Yin, and W.-C. Lee. Location Recommendation for Location-based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS, pages 458--461, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. H. Yin, Y. Sun, B. Cui, Z. Hu, and L. Chen. Lcars: A location-content-aware recommender system. In KDD, pages 221--229. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Yuan, Y. Zheng, and X. Xie. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and pois. In KDD, pages 186--194. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. Yuan and Y. Lin. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 68(1):49--67, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Q. Yuan, G. Cong, Z. Ma, A. Sun, and N. M. Thalmann. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 363--372. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J.-D. Zhang and C.-Y. Chow. igslr: personalized geo-social location recommendation: a kernel density estimation approach. In ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. V. W. Zheng, B. Cao, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, and Q. Yang. Collaborative Filtering Meets Mobile Recommendation: A User-centered Approach. In AAAI, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. V. W. Zheng, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, and Q. Yang. Collaborative location and activity recommendations with gps history data. WWW, pages 1029--1038, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Y. Zheng. Tutorial on location-based social networks. WWW, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Y. Zheng and X. Xie. Location-based social networks: Locations. Computing with Spatial Trajectories, pages 277--308, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploiting Geographical Neighborhood Characteristics for Location Recommendation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
        November 2014
        2152 pages
        ISBN:9781450325981
        DOI:10.1145/2661829

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate175of838submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader