Abstract
Background
The treatment of subtrochanteric fracture nonunion is challenging. Although revision with either an intramedullary or extramedullary device had been advocated with acceptable results, complications that require secondary procedures still arise. The use of an intramedullary device with augmentation plate fixation is a well-known approach for femoral or tibial diaphyseal nonunion. However, this approach has not previously been reported for subtrochanteric fracture nonunion.
Materials and Methods
A series of 21 cases of subtrochanteric fracture nonunion treated with an intramedullary device in combination with augmentation side plating were collected and retrospectively reviewed after an average of 18 months of followup. Fourteen patients with a prior well-fixed intramedullary device were treated with side plating and bone grafting. Seven patients underwent revision nailing in addition to side plating and bone grafting.
Results
All fractures united well without major complication. The average time to union was 7.1 months.
Conclusion
The use of an intramedullary device with augmentation plate fixation is a reliable and decisive procedure for treating subtrochanteric fracture nonunion that produces satisfactory results with a low complication rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ. Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 2010;41:739–45.
Melis GC, Chiarolini B, Tolu S. Surgical treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: Biomechanical aspects. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1979;5:163–86.
Maquet P, Pelzer-Bawin G. Mechanical analysis of inter- and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Acta Orthop Belg 1980;46:823–8.
Kinast C, Bolhofner BR, Mast JW, Ganz R. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment with the 95 degrees condylar blade-plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;238:122–30.
Sanders R, Regazzoni P. Treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures using the dynamic condylar screw. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3:206–13.
Sims SH. Subtrochanteric femur fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2002;33:113–26, viii.
Wiss DA, Brien WW. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment by interlocking nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;283:231–6.
Forward DP, Doro CJ, O’Toole RV, Kim H, Floyd JC, Sciadini MF, et al. A biomechanical comparison of a locking plate, a nail, and a 95° angled blade plate for fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:334–40.
Kuzyk PR, Bhandari M, McKee MD, Russell TA, Schemitsch EH. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:465–70.
Charnley GJ, Ward AJ. Reconstruction femoral nailing for nonunion of subtrochanteric fracture: A revision technique following dynamic condylar screw failure. IntOrthop 1996;20:55–7.
Marti R, Raaymakers EL, Nolte P, Besselaar PP. Pseudarthrosis of the proximal femur. Orthopade 1996;25:454–62.
Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
Giannoudis PV, Ahmad MA, Mineo GV, Tosounidis TI, Calori GM, Kanakaris NK, et al. Subtrochanteric fracture nonunions with implant failure managed with the “Diamond” concept. Injury 2013;44 Suppl 1:S76–81.
Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Fracture healing: The diamond concept. Injury 2007;38 Suppl 4:S3–6.
Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Schmidmaier G, Marsh D. The diamond concept – Open questions. Injury 2008;39 Suppl 2:S5–8.
Ueng SW, Liu HT, Wang IC. Augmentation plate fixation for the management of tibial nonunion after intramedullary nailing. J Trauma 2002;53:588–92.
Chen CM, Su YP, Hung SH, Lin CL, Chiu FY. Dynamic compression plate and cancellous bone graft for aseptic nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral fracture. Orthopedics 2010;33:393.
Birjandinejad A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Ahmadzadeh-Chabock H. Augmentation plate fixation for the treatment of femoral and tibial nonunion after intramedullary nailing. Orthopedics 2009;32:409.
Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic trauma association committee for coding and classification. J Orthop Trauma 1996;10 Suppl 1:v–ix, 1–154.
Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 12th ed. St. Louis (Mo): Mosby; 2012.
Weber B, Cech O. Pseudarthrosis: Pathology, Biomechanics, Therapy, Results. Berne, Switzerland: Hans Huber Publishers; 1976.
Zickel RE. Nonunions of fractures of the proximal and distal thirds of the shaft of the femur. Instr Course Lect 1988;37:173–9.
Barquet A, Mayora G, Fregeiro J, López L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L, et al. The treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions with the long gamma nail: Twenty six patients with a minimum 2-year followup. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:346–53.
de Vries JS, Kloen P, Borens O, Marti RK, Helfet DL. Treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions. Injury 2006;37:203–11.
Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;419:185–8.
Yang KH, Kim JR, Park J. Nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunion as a risk factor for exchange nailing failure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:E60–4.
Park J, Kim SG, Yoon HK, Yang KH. The treatment of nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunions with im nail exchange versus augmentation plating. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:89–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lo, Y.C., Su, Y.P., Hsieh, C.P. et al. Augmentation Plate Fixation for Treating Subtrochanteric Fracture Nonunion. JOIO 53, 246–250 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_476_17
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_476_17