Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 August 2012

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background: Approach for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis has been controversial. The aim of present study is to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of anterior versus posterior debridement and spinal fixation for the surgical treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar tuberculosis.

Materials and Methods: 70 patients with spinal tuberculosis treated surgically between Jan 2001 and Dec 2006 were included in the study. Thirty four patients (group I) with mean age 34.9 years underwent anterior debridement, decompression and instrumentation by anterior transthoracic, transpleural and/or retroperitoneal diaphragm cutting approach. Thirty six patients (group II) with mean age of 33.6 years were operated by posterolateral (extracavitary) decompression and posterior instrumentation. Various parameters like blood loss, surgical time, levels of instrumentation, neurological recovery, and kyphosis improvement were compared. Fusion assessment was done as per Bridwell criteria. Functional outcome was assessed using Prolo scale. Mean followup was 26 months.

Results: Mean surgical time in group I was 5 h 10 min versus 4 h 50 min in group II (P>0.05). Average blood loss in group I was 900 ml compared to 1100 ml in group II (P>0.05). In group I, the percentage immediate correction in kyphosis was 52.27% versus 72.80% in group II. Satisfactory bony fusion (grades I and II) was seen in 100% patients in group I versus 97.22% in group II. Three patients in group I needed prolonged immediate postoperative ICU support compared to one in group II. Injury to lung parenchyma was seen in one patient in group I while the anterior procedure had to be abandoned in one case due to pleural adhesions. Functional outcome (Prolo scale) in group II was good in 94.4% patients compared to 88.23% patients in group I.

Conclusion: Though the anterior approach is an equally good method for debridement and stabilization, kyphus correction is better with posterior instrumentation and the posterior approach is associated with less morbidity and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 01 August 2012

    Abstract

    Materials and Methods: 70 patients with spinal tuberculosis treated surgically between Jan 2001 and Dec 2006 were included in the study.

References

  1. Benli T, Kaya A, Acaroglu E. Anterior instrumentation in tuberculous spondylitis: Is it effective and safe? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;460:108–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jain AK, Dhammi IK, Prashad B, Sinha S, Mishra P. Simultaneous anterior decompression and posterior instrumentation of the tuberculous spine using an anterolateral extrapleural approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1477–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hodgson AR, Stock FE, Fang HS, Ong GB. Anterior spinal fusion: The operative approach and pathological findings in 412 patients with Pott’s disease of the spine. Br J Surg 1960;48:172–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT, Pienkowski D. Better treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis using posterior stabilization and titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krodel A, Kruger A, Lohscheidt K, Pfahler M, Refior HJ. Anterior debridement. fusion, and extrafocal stabilization in the treatment of osteomyelitis of spine. J spinal Disord 1999;8:304–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fukuta S, Miyamoto K, Masuda T, Hosoe H, Kodama H, Nishimoto H, et al. Two stage (Posterior and anterior) surgical treatment using posterior spinal instrumentation for pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28: E302–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laheri VJ, Badhe NP, Dewnany GT. Single stage decompression, anterior interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation for tuberculous kyphosis of the dorso-lumbar spine. Spinal Cord 2001;39:429–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moon MS. Combined posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion for active tuberculous kyphosis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Curr Orthopaedics 1991;5:177–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moon MS, Woo YK, Lee KS, Ha KY, Kim SS, Sun DH. Posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion for tuberculous kyphosis of dorsal and lumbar spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1910–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain AK, Dhammi IK. Tuberculosis of the Spine: A Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;460:39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Güven O, Kumano K, Yalçin S, Karaham M, Tsuji S. A single stage posterior approach and rigid fixation for preventing kyphosis in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:1039–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Louw JA. Spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficit: Treatment with anterior vascularised rib grafts, posterior osteotomies and fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:686–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee TC, Lu K, Yang LC, Huang HY, Liang CL. Transpedicular instrumentation as an adjunct in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine tuberculosis with early state bone destruction. J Neurosurg 1999;91(2 Suppl):163–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain AK, Aggarwal A, Dhammi IK, Aggarwal PK, Singh S. Extrapleural anterolateral decompression in tuberculosis of the dorsal spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:1027–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1410–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986;11:601–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuli SM. Tuberculosis of the Spine: A Historical Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;460:29–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hodgson AR, Stock FE, Fang HS, Ong GB. Anterior spinal fusion: The operative approach and pathological findings in 412 patients with Pott’s disease of the spine. Br J Surg 1960;48:172–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S. Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:1314–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen WJ, Chen CH, Shih CH. Surgical treatment of tuberculosis spondylitis: 50 patients followed for 2–8. years. Acta Orthop Scand 1995;66:137–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen WJ, Wu CC, Jung CH, Chen LH, Niu CC, Lai PL. Combined anterior and posterior surgeries in the treatment of spinal tuberculous spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;398:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oga M, Arizono T, Takasita M, Sugioka Y. Evaluation of the risk of instrumentation as a foreign body in spinal tuberculosis: Clinical and biologic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1890–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozdemir HM, Us AK, Ogün T. The role of anterior spinal instrumentation and allograft fibula for the treatment of pott disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:474–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Christodoulou AG, Givissis P, Karataglis D, Symeonidis PD, Pournaras J. Treatment of tuberulosis spondylitis with anterior stabilization and titanium cage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;444:60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundararaj GD, Behera S, Ravi V, Venkatesh K, Cherian VM, Lee V. Role of posterior stabilisation in the management of tuberculosis of the dorsal and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:100–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Calderone RR, Thomas JC Jr, Haye W, Abeles D. Outcome assessment in spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:201–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India

    Bhavuk Garg, Pankaj Kandwal, Upendra Bidre Nagaraja, Ankur Goswami & Arvind Jayaswal

Authors
  1. Bhavuk Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pankaj Kandwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Upendra Bidre Nagaraja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ankur Goswami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arvind Jayaswal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhavuk Garg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garg, B., Kandwal, P., Nagaraja, U.B. et al. Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis. IJOO 46, 165–170 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93682

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93682

Key words

Search

Navigation