Abstract
The strategy for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis depends essentially upon the magnitude and pattern of the deformity, and its potential for progression. Treatment options include observation, bracing and/or surgery. During the past decade, several studies have demonstrated that the natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can be positively affected by nonoperative treatment, especially bracing. Other forms of conservative treatment, such as chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation, acupuncture, exercise or other manual treatments, or diet and nutrition, have not yet been proven to be effective in controlling spinal deformity progression, and those with a natural history that is favorable at the completion of growth. Observation is appropriate treatment for small curves, curves that are at low risk of progression, and those with a natural history that is favorable at the completion of growth. Indications for brace treatment are a growing child presenting with a curve of 25°–40° or a curve less than 25° with documented progression. Curves of 20°–25° in patients with pronounced skeletal immaturity should also be treated. The purpose of this review is to provide information about conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Indications for conservative treatment, hours daily wear and complications of brace treatment as well as brace types are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fernandez-Filiberti R, Flynn J, Ramirez N, Trautmann M, Alegria M. Effectiveness of TLSO bracing in the conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:176–81.
Nachemson A, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:815–22.
Lonstein JE, Winter RB. The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A review of 1020 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:1207–21.
Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau E. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of nonoperative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:664–74.
Olafsson Y, Saraste H, Soderlund V, Hoffsten M. Boston brace in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:524–7.
Asher MA, Burton DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 2006;1:2.
Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, Weinstein SL. Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:712–7.
Götze C, Liljenqvist UR, Slomka A, Götze HG, Steinbeck J. Quality of life and back pain: Outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:1456–64.
Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E, MacEwen GD. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:90–6.
Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve p rogression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A case-control study. Spine 2001;26:1449–56.
Barrios C, Pérez-Encinas C, Maruenda JI, Laguía M. Significant ventilatory functional restriction in adolescents with mild or moderate scoliosis during maximal exercise tolerance test. Spine 2005;30:1610–5.
Chong K, Letts R, Cumming G. Influence of spinal curvature on exercise capacity. J Ped Orthop 1981;1:251–4.
Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D. Incidence and severity of back pain in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1983;8:749–56.
Pehrsson K, Danielsson A, Nachemson A. Pulmonary function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A 25 year follow-up after surgery or start of brace treatment. Thorax 2001;56:388–93.
Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of Curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1061–71.
Noonan KJ, Weinstein SL, Jacobson WC, Dolan LA. Use of the Milwaukee brace for progressive idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:557–67.
Katz DE, Richards BS, Browne RH, Herring JA. A comparison between the Boston brace and the Charleston bending brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997;22:1302–12.
Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H. Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6 months follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:201–7.
Carr WA, Moe JH, Winter RB, Lonstein JE. Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the Milwaukee brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:599–612.
O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, Elerson EE, BrintzenhofeSzoc KM, Katz DE, et al. Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1069–74.
Maruyama T. Bracing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review of the literature of effective conservative treatment looking for end results 5 years after weaning. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:786–91.
Weiss HR, Weiss G, Schaar HJ. Incidence of surgery in conservatively treated patients with scoliosis. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:111–8.
Rigo M, Reiter CH, Weiss HR. Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:209–14.
Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An evidence-based review. Spine 2007;32:S91–100.
Lange JE, Steen H, Brox JN. Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2009;4:17.
Wiley JW, Thomson JD, Mitchell TM, Smith BG, Banta JV. Effectiveness of the Boston brace in treatment of large curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:2326–32.
Green NE. Part-time bracing of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:738–43.
Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME. The Boston Bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis: Follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine 1986;11:792–801.
Allington NJ, Bowen JR. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Treatment with the Wilmington brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1056–62.
Peltonen J, Poussa M, Ylikoski M. Three year results of bracing in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:487–90.
Matsunaga S, Hayashi K, Naruo T, Nozoe S, Komiya S. Psychologic management of brace therapy for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:547–50.
Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:3027–38.
Fayssoux RS, Cho RH, Herman MJ. A history of bracing for Idiopathic Scoliosis in North America. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:654–64.
Bunge EM, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Biezen FC, Essink-Bot ML, de Koning HJ. Patients’ Preferences for Scoliosis Brace Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Spine 2010; 35:57–63.
Watts HG, Hall JE, Stanish W. The Boston brace system for the treatment of low thoracic and lumbar scoliosis by the use of a girdle without superstructure. Clin Orthop 1977;126:87–92.
Stagnara P, de Mauroy JC. Résultats à long terme du traitement orthopédique lyonnais. In: Actualités en rééducation fonctionnelle et réadaptation. Ed. Masson, Paris; 1977.
Stagnara P, Desbrosses J. Scolioses essentielles pendant l’enfance et l’adolescence: Résultats des traitements orthopédiques et chirurgicaux. Rev Chir Orthop 1960;46:562–75.
Weiss HR. Conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with physical therapy and orthoses. Orthopade 2003;32:146–56.
Weiss HR, Rehabilitation of adolescent patients with scoliosis—what do we know? A review of the literature. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:183–94.
Chêneau J. Orthese de scoliose, 1st Ed. Chêneau, J., Saint Orensm; 1990.
Rigo M. Intra-observer reliability of a new classification correlating with brace treatment. Pediatr Rehabil 2004;7:63.
Hidalgo AH. Nueva aportación del corsé de Málaga al pronóstico y tratamiento de la escoliosis. Ph.D. Thesis, Sevilla, Spain: Universidad de Sevilla;1993.
Negrini S, Marchini G. Efficacy of the symmetric, patientoriented, rigid, three-dimensional, active (SPoRT) concept of bracing for scoliosis: A prospective study of the Sforzesco versus Lyon brace. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:171–81.
Negrini S, Marchini G, Tomaello L. The Sforzesco brace and SPoRT concept (Symmetric, Patient-oriented, Rigid, Threedimensional) versus the Lyon brace and 3-point systems for bracing idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Inform 2006; 123:245–9.
Trivedi JM, Thomson JD. Results of Charleston bracing in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:277–80.
Price CT, Scott DS, Reed FE, Riddick MF. Nighttime bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston bending brace. Preliminary report. Spine 1990;15:1294–9.
Price CT, Scott DS, Reed FE, Sproul JT, Riddick MF. Nighttime bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston Bending Brace: Long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:703–7.
Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Kinnunen R, Poussa M. Effectiveness of the Providence nighttime bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative study of 36 female patients. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1139–43.
Howard A, Wright JG, Hedden D. A comparative study of TLSO, Charleston, and Milwaukee braces for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1998;23:2404–11.
Gepstein R, Leitner Y, Zohar E, Angel I, Shabat S, Pekarsky I, et al. Effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace in the treatment of single-curve idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:84–74.
Janicki J, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Thompson GH. A comparison of the thoracolumbosacral orthoses and providence orthosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Results using the new SRS inclusion and assessment criteria for bracing studies. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:369–74.
Federico DJ, Renshaw TS. Results of treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston Bending Brace. Spine 1990; 15:886–7.
D’Amato CR, Griggs S, McCoy B. Nighttime bracing with the providence brace in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:2006–12.
Wong MS, Cheng JC, Lam TP, Ng BK, Sin SW, Lee-Shum SL, et al. The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2008;33:1360–5.
Coillard C, Vachon V, Circo AB, Beauséjour M, Rivard C H. Effectiveness of the SpineCor brace based on the new standardized criteria proposed by the scoliosis research society for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:375–9.
Coillard C, Leroux MA, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH. SpineCor–a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Posttreatment results. Eur Spine J 2003;12:141–8.
Weiss HR, Bohr S, Jahnke A, Pleines S. Acupucture in the treatment of scoliosis - a single blind controlled pilot study. Scoliosis 2008;3:4.
Cassella MC, Hall JE. Current treatment approaches in the nonoperative and operative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Phys Ther 1991;71:897–909.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canavese, F., Kaelin, A. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment. IJOO 45, 7–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.73655
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.73655