Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Hearing Aid Rehabilitation Questionnaire in Dutch: Examination of Its Psychometric Properties and Potential Use as A Screening Instrument
Previous Article in Journal
Are Open-Fit Hearing Aids A Possible Alternative to Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices in Patients with Mild to Severe Hearing Loss? A Preliminary Trial
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Dancers and Non-Dancers

by
Sujeet Kumar Sinha
*,
Vaishnavi Bohra
and
Himanshu Kumar Sanju
Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2013, 3(1), e6; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e6
Submission received: 16 May 2013 / Revised: 18 October 2013 / Accepted: 18 October 2013 / Published: 21 October 2013

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the sacculocollic and otolith ocular pathway function using cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and ocular vestibular myogenic potentials (oVEMP) in dancers and non dancers. Total 16 subjects participated in the study. Out of 16 participants, 8 were trained in Indian classical form of dance (dancers) and other 8 participants who were not trained in any dance form (non dancers). cVEMP and oVEMP responses were recorded for all the subjects. Non Parametric Mann-Whitney U test revealed no significant difference between dancers and non dancers for the latency and amplitude parameter for cVEMP and oVEMP, i.e. P13, N23 latency and P13-N23 complex amplitude and N10, P14 latency, N10-P14 complex amplitude respectively. The vestibular system comprises of several structures. It is possible that the dance style practiced by the dancer’s group assessed in this study does not contribute towards improving the plasticity of the sacculocollic and otolith-ocular pathways. It can be concluded that not all forms of dance training brings about a change in the plasticity of the sacculocollic and otolithocular pathways.
Keywords: vestibular evoked myogenic potentials; sacculocollic pathway; otolith-ocular pathway; dancers vestibular evoked myogenic potentials; sacculocollic pathway; otolith-ocular pathway; dancers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sinha, S.K.; Bohra, V.; Sanju, H.K. Comparison of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Dancers and Non-Dancers. Audiol. Res. 2013, 3, e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e6

AMA Style

Sinha SK, Bohra V, Sanju HK. Comparison of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Dancers and Non-Dancers. Audiology Research. 2013; 3(1):e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e6

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sinha, Sujeet Kumar, Vaishnavi Bohra, and Himanshu Kumar Sanju. 2013. "Comparison of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Dancers and Non-Dancers" Audiology Research 3, no. 1: e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e6

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop