J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2012 Feb;47(1):35-40. Korean.
Published online Feb 29, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association
Original Article

Early Aseptic Loosening after Total Knee Replacement Using Legacy Posterior Stabilized-Flex Prosthesis

Young-Joon Choi, M.D., Jeong-Ho Kang, M.D., Ki-Won Lee, M.D., Youn-Suk Joo, M.D., Jun-Seok Park, M.D. and Han-Ho Choo, M.D.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Received May 31, 2011; Revised August 18, 2011; Accepted August 25, 2011.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

We analyzed the patterns and causative factors of early aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty (TKR) using a legacy posterior stabilized (LPS)-flex prosthesis.

Materials and Methods

We examined 483 cases that occurred in 311 patients who underwent TKR using LPS-flex by single surgeon between August 2001 and March 2007 and who were followed-up for at least 2 years. The loosened group included 25 cases that exhibited early aseptic loosening on radiograph, the remaining 458 cases were regarded as the control group, and analysis was performed.

Results

The mean loosening period was 34.7 months and femoral component loosening alone was found in 22 cases (88%). There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, or pre-operative range of motion between the 2 groups, but varus deformity was more severe in the loosened group (mean 8.92°) than in the control group (mean 5.21°) (p=0.003). Protrusion of the femoral component proximally over posterior condyle of the distal femur were more prominent in the loosened group (mean 20.3%) than in the control group (mean 13.4%) (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Early loosening after TKR using LPS-flex prosthesis developed mostly in the femoral component. Choosing a proper size for the femoral component and cutting level for the distal femur should be considered.

Keywords
femoral prosthesis; loosening; arthroplasty replacement total

Figures

Figure 1
We measured the extent of protruded femoral component by the proportion of uncovered surface (A) to total length of posterior condyle of femoral component (B).

Figure 2
A 65-year-old female patient (A-D) had lateral radiographs taken at 13, 60, 77, and 84 months respectively, showing progressive loosening at anterior flange and posterior condyle with proximal migration of femoral component. (E) There was a scanty cement mantle on backside of the femoral component.

Tables

Table 1
Patient Demographic and Radiographic Data

References

    1. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:50–53.
    1. Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aubaniac JM. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2005;38:277–284.
    1. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, et al. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1721–1729.
    1. Li G, Zayontz S, DeFrate LE, Most E, Suggs JF, Rubash HE. Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 2004;22:90–95.
    1. Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:95–97.
    1. Sharma A, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Cates HE Jr. High-flexion TKA designs: what are their in vivo contact mechanics? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;464:117–126.
    1. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(416):167–173.
    1. Cho SD, Ko SH, Park MS, et al. Early loosening of primary high flex total knee arthroplasty: report of 4 cases. J Korean Knee Soc 2006;18:107–111.
    1. Han HS, Kang SB, Yoon KS. High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1457–1461.
    1. King TV, Scott RD. Femoral component loosening in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;(194):285–290.
    1. Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(416):174–176.
    1. Ritter MA. High-flexion knee designs: more hype than hope? In the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006;21 4 Suppl 1:40–41.
    1. Kim TH, Lee DH, Bin SI. The NexGen LPS-flex to the knee prosthesis at a minimum of three years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1304–1310.
    1. Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 2002;20:881–886.
    1. Thambyah A, Goh JC, De SD. Contact stresses in the knee joint in deep flexion. Med Eng Phys 2005;27:329–335.
    1. Zhang Y, Hunter DJ, Nevitt MC, et al. Association of squatting with increased prevalence of radiographic tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis: the Beijing Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1187–1192.
    1. Nakayama K, Matsuda S, Miura H, Iwamoto Y, Higaki H, Otsuka K. Contact stress at the post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:483–488.
    1. Zelle J, Janssen D, Van Eijden J, De Waal Malefijt M, Verdonschot N. Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty promote early loosening of the femoral component? J Orthop Res 2011;29:976–983.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

Tables

1 / 1

PERMALINK