Abstract
We investigated whether spatial resolution would be the same in the lower and upper halves of thevertical meridian (VM) of our visual field and whether attention would affect them differentially. It has been reported that (1) attending to the target’s location improves performance in a texture segregation task when the observer’s spatial resolution is too low (peripheral locations) but impairs it when resolution is already too high (central locations) for the task. This finding indicates an enhanced spatial resolution at the attended location (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998, 2000), (2) observers’ contrast sensitivity is higher in the lower than in the upper VM, a phenomenon known asvertical meridian asymmetry (VMA), an asymmetry determined by visual rather than by attentional factors (Carrasco, Talgar, & Cameron, 2001). In the present texture segregation task, performance was assessed under neutral- and peripheralcue conditions. Transient covert attention was systematically manipulated by using a peripheral cue that indicated the target’s location and its onset. Observers reported the interval containing a target patch appearing at one of a number of eccentricities in a large texture pattern along the VM. We found that (1) performance peaked at farther eccentricities in the lower than in the upper visual VM, indicating that resolution was higher in the lower half, and (2) the peripheral cue affected performance along the VM uniformly, indicating that the degree of enhanced resolution brought about by transient attention was constant along the VM. Thus, we conclude that the VMA for spatial resolution is determined by visual, not transient covert attentional, constraints.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altpeter, E., Mackeben, M., &Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. (2000). The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies.Vision Research,40, 1539–1547.
Berardi, N., &Fiorentini, A. (1991). Visual field asymmetries in pattern discrimination: A sign of asymmetry in cortical visual field representation?Vision Research,37, 831–836.
Cameron, E. L., Tai, J. C., &Carrasco, M. (2001).Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.Vision Research,42, 949–967.
Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., &Katz, S.M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1241–1261.
Carrasco, M., &Frieder, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.Vision Research,37, 63–82.
Carrasco, M., &McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention speeds the accrual of visual information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,98, 5363–5367.
Carrasco, M., McLean, T. L., Katz, S.M., &Frieder, K. S. (1998). Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.Vision Research,38, 347–374.
Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., &Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement.Vision Research,40, 1203–1215.
Carrasco, M., Talgar, C., & Cameron, L. (2001). Characterizing visual performance fields: Effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task, and set size.Spatial Vision,14.
Carrasco, M., Williams, P., &Yeshurun, Y. (2002). Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement.Journal of Vision,2, 467–479.
Carrasco, M., &Yeshurun, Y. (1998). The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 673–692.
Cheal, M. L., &Lyon, D.R. (1992). Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination.Acta Psychologica,81, 243–267.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Connolly, M., &Van Essen, D. (1984). The representation of the visual field in parvocellular and magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey.Journal of Comparative Neurology,266, 544–564.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
DeValois, R. L., &DeValois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Edgar, G. K., &Smith, A. T. (1990). Hemifield differences of perceived spatial frequency.Perception,19, 759–766.
Foley, J. M., &Schwartz, W. (1998). Spatial attention: Effect of position uncertainty and number of distracter patterns on the thresholdversus-contrast function for contrast discrimination.Journal of the Optical Society of America,15, 1036–1047.
Geisler, W. S., &Chou, K. L. (1995). Separation of low-level and highlevel factors in complex tasks: Visual search.Psychological Review,102, 356–378.
Graham, N. (1989).Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Graham, N., Rico, M., Offen, S., &Scott, W. (1999). Texture segregation shows only a very small lower-hemifield advantage.Vision Research,39, 1171–1175.
Gurnsey, R., Pearson, P., &Day, D. (1996). Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: Nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 738–757.
He, S., Cavanagh, P., &Intrilligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.Nature,383, 334–337.
Hofmann, M. I., &Hallett, P.E. (1993). Texture segregation based on two-dimensional relative phase differences in composite sine-wave grating patterns.Vision Research,33, 221–234.
Joffe, K. M., &Scialfa, C. T. (1995). Texture segmentation as a function of eccentricity, spatial frequency and target size.Spatial Vision,9, 325–342.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Julesz, B. (1981). A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons.Biological Cybernetics,41, 131–138.
Kehrer, L. (1989). Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks.Spatial Vision,4, 45–62.
Lamme, V. A. F., Van Dijk, B. W., &Spekreijse, J. (1993). Organization of texture segregation processing in primate visual cortex.Vision Neuroscience,10, 781–790.
Lee, D. K., Itti, C., Koch, C., &Braun, J. (1999). Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.Nature Neuroscience,2, 375–381.
Lee, D. K., Koch, C., &Braun, J. (1997). Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention.Vision Research,37, 2409–2418.
Lu, Z. L., &Dosher, B. A. (1998). External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms.Vision Research,38, 1183–1198.
Lu, Z. L., Liu, C. Q., &Dosher, B. (2000). Attention mechanisms for multilocation first- and second-order motion perception.Vision Research,40, 173–186.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S.A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M.G., Clark, V. P., &Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 887–904.
Mackeben, M. (1999). Sustained focal attention and peripheral letter recognition.Spatial Attention,12, 51–72.
Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., &Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O’Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.),Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 37–45). New York: North-Holland.
Moran, J., &Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.Science,229, 782–784.
Morgan, M. J., Ward, R.M., &Castet, E. (1998). Visual search for a tilted target: Tests of spatial uncertainty models.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 343–370.
Morikawa, K. (2000). Central performance drop in texture segmentation: The role of spatial and temporal factors.Vision Research,40, 3455–3552.
Müller, M. M., Picton, T. W., Valdes-Sosa, P., Riera, J., Teder-Salejarvi, W. A., &Hillyard, S. A. (1998). Effects of spatial attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range.Cognitive Brain Research,6, 249–261.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1646.
Nazir, T.A. (1992). Effects of lateral masking and pre-cueing on gap resolution in central and peripheral vision.Vision Research,32, 771–777.
Northdurft, H. C. (1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast.Vision Research,31, 1073–1078.
Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.Vision Research,34, 1703–1721.
Pearson, P., &Gurnsey, R. (1992). Texture discrimination with foveal and peripheral presentation.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,33, 960.
Perry, V.H., &Cowey, A. (1984). Retinal ganglion cells that project to the superior colliculus and pretectum in the macaque monkey.Neuroscience,12, 1125–1137.
Perry, V. H., &Cowey, A. (1985). The ganglion cell and cone distribution in the monkey retina: Implications for central magnification factors.Vision Research,25, 1795–1810.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Previc, F.H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,13, 519–575.
Purpura, K. P., Victor, J. D., &Katz, E. (1994). Striate cortex extracts higher-order spatial correlations from visual textures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,91, 8482–8486.
Reynolds, J. H., &Desimone, R. (1999). The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem.Neuron,24, 19–29.
Rijsdijk, J. P., Kroon, J. N., &Van der Wilt, G. J. (1980). Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina.Vision Research,20, 235–241.
Rovamo, J., &Virsu, V. (1979). An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor.Experimental Brain Research,37, 495–510.
Rubin, N., Nakayama, K., &Shapley, R. (1996). Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields.Science,271, 651–653.
Shiu, L., &Pashler, J. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precueing on identification of single digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1037–1054.
Shiu, L., &Pashler, J. (1995). Spatial attention and vernier acuity.Vision Research,35, 337–343.
Solomon, J. A., Lavie, N., &Morgan, M. J. (1997). Contrast discrimination function: Spatial cuing effects.Journal of the Optical Society of America,14, 2443–2448.
Sperling, G., &Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas,Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 1–65). New York: Wiley.
Tootell, R. B. H., Switkes, E., Silverman, M. S., &Hamilton, S. L. (1998). Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex, II: Retinotopic organization.Journal of Neuroscience,8, 1531–1568.
Tsal, Y., &Shalev, L. (1996). Inattention magnifies perceived length: The attentional receptive field hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 233–243.
Van Essen, D. C., Newsome, W. T., &Maunsell, J. H. R. (1984). The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability.Vision Research,24, 429–448.
Verghese, P., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Stimulus discriminability in visual search.Vision Research,18, 2453–2467.
Yeshurun, Y., &Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution.Nature,396, 72–75.
Yeshurun, Y., &Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks.Vision Research,39, 293–305.
Yeshurun, Y., &Carrasco, M. (2000). The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation.Nature Neuroscience,3, 622–627.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Grant NSF/BCS-9910734 and a Cattell fellowship to M.C. and a Katzell Summer Fellowship to C.P.T. supported this research, which was presented at the meeting of the Visual Sciences Society (May, 2001) and at the European Conference in Visual Perception (August, 2001).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Talgar, C.P., Carrasco, M. Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 714–722 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196326
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196326