Abstract
It is a matter of common sense that a person is easier to recognize when close than when far away. A possible explanation for why this happens begins with two observations. First, the human visual system, like many image-processing devices, can be viewed as a spatial filter that passes higher spatial frequencies, expressed in terms of cycles/degree, progressively more poorly. Second, as a face is moved farther from the observer, the face’s image spatial frequency spectrum, expressed in terms of cycles/ face, scales downward in a manner inversely proportional to distance. An implication of these two observations is that as a face moves away, progressively lower spatial frequencies, expressed in cycles/face—and therefore, progressively coarser facial details—are lost to the observer at a rate that is likewise inversely proportional to distance. We propose what we call thedistance-as-filtering hypothesis, which is that these two observations are sufficient to explain the effect of distance on face processing. If the distance-as-filtering hypothesis is correct, one should be able to simulate the effect of seeing a face at some distance, D, by filtering the face so as to mimic its spatial frequency composition, expressed in terms of cycles/face, at that distance. In four experiments, we measured face perception at varying distances that were simulated either by filtering the face as just described or by shrinking the face so that it subtended the visual angle corresponding to the desired distance. The distance-asfiltering hypothesis was confirmed perfectly in two face perception tasks: assessing the informational content of the face and identifying celebrities. Data from the two tasks could be accounted for by assuming that they were mediated by different low-pass spatial filters within the human visual system that have the same general mathematical description but that differ in scale by a factor of approximately 0.75. We discuss our results in terms of (1) how they can be used to explain the effect of distance on visual processing, (2) what they tell us about face processing, (3) how they are related to “flexible spatial scale usage,” as discussed by Schyns and colleagues, and (4) how they may be used in practical (e.g., legal) settings to demonstrate the loss of face information that occurs when a person is seen at a particular distance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bamber, D. (l979). State trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,19, 137–181.
Bernstein, D. M., Atance, C., Loftus, G. R., &Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). We saw it all along: Visual hindsight bias in children and adults.Psychological Science,15, 264–267.
Blakemore, C., &Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.Journal of Physiology,203, 237–260.
Bracewell, R. N. (1986).The Fourier transform and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision,10, 433–436.
Bruner, J. S., &Potter, M. C. (1964). Interference in visual search.Science,144, 424–425.
Campbell, F. W., &Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.Journal of Physiology,197, 551–566.
Costen, N. P., Parker, D. M., &Craw, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 602–612.
De Valois, R. L., &De Valois, K. K. (1980). Spatial vision.Annual Review of Psychology,31, 309–341.
De Valois, R. L., &De Valois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., &Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception?Psychological Review,105,482–4988.
Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L., &Sandini, G. (1983). The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception.Perception,12, 195–201.
Georgeson, M. A., &Sullivan, G. D. (1975). Contrast constancy: De-blurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels.Journal of Physiology,252,627–6566.
Gosselin, F., &Schyns, P. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks.Vision Research,41, 2261–2271.
Graham, N. (1989).Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harley, E. M., Bernstein, D. M., & Loftus, G. R. (2002, November).Visual hindsight bias in object and face recognition. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
Harley, E. M., Carlsen, K., &Loftus, G. R. (2004). The “saw it all along” effect: Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 960–968.
Harley, E. M., Dillon, A., &Loftus, G. R. (2004). Why is it difficult to see in the fog? How stimulus contrast affects visual perception and visual memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 197–231.
Harmon, L. D., &Julesz, B. (1973). Masking in visual recognition: Effects of two dimensional filtered noise.Science,180, 1194–1197.
Hayes, T., Morrone, M. C., &Burr, D. C. (1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images.Perception,15, 595–602.
Loftus, G. R., &Busey, T. A. (1992). Multidimensional models and iconic decay.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 356–361.
Loftus, G. R., Johnson, C. A., &Shimamura, A. P. (1985). How much is an icon worth?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 1–13.
Loftus, G. R., &Ruthruff, E. R. (1994). A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensity— duration trade-offs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 33–49.
Morrison, D. J., &Schyns, P. G. (2001). Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 454–469.
Oliva, A., &Schyns, P. G. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges: Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli.Cognitive Psychology,34, 72–107.
Olzak, L. A., &Thomas, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 7–1 to 7–56). New York: Wiley.
O’Toole, A. J., Wenger, M. J., &Townsend, J. T. (2001). Quantitative models of perceiving and remembering faces: Precedents and possibilities. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.),Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Palmer, J. C. (1986a). Mechanisms of displacement discrimination with and without perceived movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 411–421.
Palmer, J. C. (1986b). Mechanisms of displacement discrimination with a visual reference.Vision Research,26, 1939–1947.
Parish, D. H., &Sperling, G. (1991). Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination.Vision Research,31, 1399–1415.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision,10, 437–442.
Reinitz, M. T., &Alexander, R. (1996). Mechanisms of facilitation in primed perceptual identification.Memory & Cognition,24, 129–135.
Robson, J. G. (1966). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity functions of the visual system.Journal of the Optical Society of America,56, 1141–1142.
Schyns, P. G., &Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentation.Cognition,69, 243–265.
Shlaer, S. (1937). The relation between visual acuity and illumination.Journal of General Psychology,21, 165–188.
Townsend, J. T., Soloman, B., &Smith, J. S. (2001). The perfect gestalt: Infinite dimensional Riemannian face spaces and other aspects of face perception. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.),Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition (pp. 39–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990) Priming and human memory systems.Science,247, 301–306.
van Nes, R. L., &Bouman, M. A. (1967). Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye.Journal of the Optical Society of America,57, 401–406.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH41637 to G.R.L. We thank Keri Carlsen and Jacquie Pickrell for assistance in data collection. We thank Davida Teller for detailed and very useful comments on two earlier drafts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loftus, G.R., Harley, E.M. Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 43–65 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196348
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196348