Abstract
This article describes a program, PRODCLIN (distribution of the PRODuct Confidence Limits for INdirect effects), written for SAS, SPSS, and R, that computes confidence limits for the product of two normal random variables. The program is important because it can be used to obtain more accurate confidence limits for the indirect effect, as demonstrated in several recent articles (MacKinnon, Lockwood, & Williams, 2004; Pituch, Whittaker, & Stapleton, 2005). Tests of the significance of and confidence limits for indirect effects based on the distribution of the product method have more accurate Type I error rates and more power than other, more commonly used tests. Values for the two paths involved in the indirect effect and their standard errors are entered in the PRODCLIN program, and distribution of the product confidence limits are computed. Several examples are used to illustrate the PRODCLIN program. The PRODCLIN programs in rich text format may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ajzen, I., &Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Aroian, L. A. (1944). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,18, 265–271.
Aroian, L. A.,Taneja, V. S., &Cornwell, L. W. (1978). Mathematical forms of the distribution of the product of two normal variables.Communications in Statistics: Theory & Methods,7, 165–172.
Bentler, P. (1997). EQS for Windows (Version 5.6) [Computer program]. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bollen, K. A., &Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability.Sociological Methodology,20, 115–140.
Craig, C. C. (1936). On the frequency function ofxy.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,7, 1–15.
Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., &Duncan, B. (1972).Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press.
Elliott, D. L., Goldberg, L., Duncan, T. E., Kuehl, K. S., Moe, E. L., Breger, R. K. R., et al. (2004). The PHLAME firefighters’ study: Feasibility and findings.American Journal of Health Behavior,28, 13–23.
Folmer, H. (1981). Measurement of the effects of regional policy instruments by means of linear structural equation models and panel data.Environment & Planning A,13, 1435–1448.
Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products.Journal of the American Statistical Association,55, 708–713.
Hanushek, E. A., &Jackson, J. E. (1977).Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press.
Hayya, J. C., &Ferrara, W. L. (1972). On normal approximations of the frequency functions of standard forms where the main variables are normally distributed.Management Science,19, 173–186.
Jöreskog, K. G., &Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL (Version 8.12) [Computer program]. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Judd, C. M., &Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations.Evaluation Review,5, 602–619.
Lockwood, C. M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1998). Bootstrapping the standard error of the mediated effect. InProceedings of the 23rd Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (pp. 997–1002).
Lomnicki, Z. A. (1967). On the distribution of products of random variables.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B,29, 513–524.
MacKinnon, D. P., &Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies.Evaluation Review,17, 144–158.
MacKinnon, D. P., Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., Hansen, W. B., Flay, B. R., &Wang, E. Y. I. (1991). Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: First-year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project.Health Psychology,10, 164–172.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Hoffman, J. M. (1998, June).A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., &Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological Methods,7, 83–104.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., &Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods.Multivariate Behavioral Research,39, 99–128.
MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., &Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures.Multivariate Behavioral Research,30, 41–62.
Meeker, W. Q., Jr.,Cornwell, L. W., &Aroian, L. A. (1981). The product of two normally distributed random variables. In W. J. Kennedy & R. E. Odeh (Eds.),Selected tables in mathematical statistics, Volume VII. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Meeker, W. Q., Jr., &Escobar, L. A. (1994). An algorithm to compute the CDF of the product of two normal random variables.Communications in Statistics: Simulation & Computation,23, 271–280.
Miller, A. J. (1997). FNPROD [Computer program]. Available at users .bigpond.net.au/amiller/.
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., &Boes, D. C. (1974).Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morris, A. H., Jr. (1992).Evaluation of EXP(X2)*ERFC(X) for X ≥ 1. Fortran computer code.
Muthén, L. K., &Muthén, B. O. (2004).Mplus 3.0: User’s guide. Los Angeles: Author.
Pituch, K. A., Whittaker, T. A., &Stapleton, L. M. (2005). A comparison of methods to test for mediation in multisite experiments.Multivariate Behavioral Research,40, 1–23.
Preacher, K. J., &Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 717–731.
R Development Core Team (2005). R (Version 2.2.0) [Computer program]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., &Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.Science,277, 918–924.
SAS Institute (2005). SAS (Version 9.1) [Computer program]. Cary, NC: Author.
Shrout, P. E., &Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods,7, 422–445.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models.Sociological Methodology,13, 290–312.
Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models.Sociological Methodology,16, 159–186.
Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models.Psychometrika,55, 495–515.
Springer, M. D., &Thompson, W. E. (1966). The distribution of products of independent random variables.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics,14, 511–526.
SPSS Inc. (2005). SPSS (Version 13.0.0) [Computer program]. Chicago: Author.
Stone, C. A., &Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum likelihood.Psychometrika,55, 337–352.
Wolchik, S. A., Ruehlman, L. S., Braver, S. L., &Sandler, I. N. (1989). Social support of children of divorce: Direct and stress buffering effects.American Journal of Community Psychology,17, 485–501.
Wolfram, S. (1996). Mathematica (Version 3.0) [Computer program]. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Research, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA09757
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacKinnon, D.P., Fritz, M.S., Williams, J. et al. Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods 39, 384–389 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193007
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193007