Abstract
Given a single fixation, memory for scenes containing salient objects near both the left and right view boundaries exhibited a rightward bias in boundary extension (Experiment 1). On each trial, a 500-msec picture and 2.5-sec mask were followed by a boundary adjustment task. Observers extended boundaries 5% more on the right than on the left. Might this reflect an asymmetric distribution of attention? In Experiments 2A and 2B, free viewing of pictures revealed that first saccades were more often leftward (62%) than rightward (38%). In Experiment 3, 500-msec pictures were interspersed with 2.5-sec masks. A subsequent object recognition memory test revealed better memory for left-side objects. Scenes were always mirror reversed for half the observers, thus ruling out idiosyncratic scene compositions as the cause of these asymmetries. Results suggest an unexpected leftward bias of attention that selectively enhanced the representations, causing a smaller boundary extension error and better object memory on the views’ left sides.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babkoff, H., Faust, M., & Lavidor, M. (1997). Lexical decision, visual hemifield and angle of orientation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 487–495.
Behrmann, M., & Geng, J. J. (2002). What is “left” when all is said and done? Spatial coding and hemispatial neglect. In H. O. Karnath, A. D. Milner, & G. Vallar (Eds.), The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect (pp. 85–100). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bisiach, E., Cornacchia, L., Sterzi, R., & Vallar, G. (1984). Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain, 107, 37–52.
Bowen, A., McKenna, K., & Tallis, R. C. (1999). Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke, 30, 1196–1202.
Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491–498.
Bryden, M. P., & Rainey, C. A. (1963). Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 568–571.
Bultitude, J. H., & Aimola Davies, A. M. (2006). Putting attention on the line: Investigating the activation—orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1849–1858.
Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chapman, P., Ropar, D., Mitchell, P., & Ackroyd, K. (2005). Understanding boundary extension: Normalization and extension errors in picture memory among adults and boys with and without Asperger’s syndrome. Visual Cognition, 12, 1265–1290.
Charles, J., Sahraie, A., & McGeorge, P. (2007). Hemispatial asymmetries in judgment of stimulus size. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 687–698.
Chiarello, C. (1985). Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming. Brain & Language, 26, 146–172.
Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7426–7435.
Delis, D. C., Robertson, L. C., & Efron, R. (1986). Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 24, 205–214.
Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837.
Dickinson, C. A., & Intraub, H. (2008). Transsaccadic representation of layout: What is the time course of boundary extension? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 543–555.
Ebersbach, G., Trottenberg, T., Hättig, H., Schelosky, L., Schrag, A., & Poewe, W. (1996). Directional bias of initial visual exploration: A symptom of neglect in Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 119, 79–87.
Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., & Anderson, C. (1988). Modes of visual word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain & Language, 35, 254–273.
Epstein, R. A. (2005). The cortical basis of visual scene processing. Visual Cognition, 12, 954–978.
Faust, M., Kravetz, S., & Babkoff, H. (1993). Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences. Brain & Language, 44, 254–263.
Fecteau, J. H., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Visual letter matching: Hemispheric functioning or scanning biases? Neuropsychologia, 43, 1412–1428.
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355.
Gitelman, D. R., Nobre, A. C., Parrish, T. B., LaBar, K. S., Kim, Y.-H., Meyer, J. R., & Mesulam, M.-M. (1999). A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: Further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. Brain, 122, 1093–1106.
Göbel, S. M., Calabria, M., Farnè, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating “spatial” neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44, 860–868.
Gottesman, C. V., & Intraub, H. (2002). Surface construal and the mental representation of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 589–599.
Hausmann, M., Corballis, M. C., & Fabri, M. (2003). Line bisection in the split brain. Neuropsychology, 17, 602–609.
Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R. T. (1987). Hemispace and hemispatial neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 115–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1972). Auditory neglect in man. Archives of Neurology, 26, 32–35.
Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1985). Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438–443.
Hines, D. (1978). Visual information processing in the left and right hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 16, 593–600.
Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787–795.
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 113–136.
Intraub, H. (2004). Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind observer. Cognition, 94, 19–37.
Intraub, H. (2007). Scene perception: The world through a window. In M. A. Peterson, B. Gillam, & H. A. Sedgwick (Eds.), Mental structure in visual perception: Julian Hochberg’s contributions to our understanding of the perception of pictures, film, and the world (pp. 454–466). New York: Oxford University Press.
Intraub, H., & Bodamer, J. L. (1993). Boundary extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation or encoding artifact? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1387–1397.
Intraub, H., Daniels, K. K., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). Looking at scenes while searching for numbers: Dividing attention multiplies space. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1337–1349.
Intraub, H., & Dickinson, C. A. (2008). False memory 1/20th of a second later: What the early onset of boundary extension reveals about perception. Psychological Science, 19, 1007–1014.
Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V., & Bills, A. J. (1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 186–201.
Intraub, H., Hoffman, J. E., Wetherhold, C. J., & Stoehs, S.-A. (2006). More than meets the eye: The effect of planned fixations on scene representation. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 759–769.
Intraub, H., & Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of closeup scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 179–187.
Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882–895.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194–203.
Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110.
Karnath, H. O., Milner, A. D., & Vallar, G. (Eds.) (2002). The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 33, 193–201.
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897–1916.
Leiber, L. (1976). Lexical decisions in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain & Language, 3, 443–450.
Lindell, A. K. (2006). In your right mind: Right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 131–148.
Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 565–572.
Luh, K. E., Rueckert, L. M., & Levy, J. (1991). Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain & Cognition, 16, 83–103.
Martin, M. (1979). Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing. Neuropsychologia, 17, 33–40.
Mattingley, J. B., Berberovic, N., Corben, L., Slavin, M. J., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2004). The greyscales task: A perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage. Neuropsychologia, 42, 387–394.
McCourt, M. E. (2001). Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1065–1076.
McCourt, M. E., Garlinghouse, M., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2005). Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex, 41, 499–511.
McCourt, M. E., & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37, 843–855.
Mesulam, M.-M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309–325.
Mishkin, M., & Forgays, D. G. (1952). Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 43–48.
Morikawa, K., & McBeath, M. K. (1992). Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction. Vision Research, 32, 1137–1141.
Nicholls, M. E. R., Bradshaw, J. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (1999). Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia, 37, 307–314.
Nicholls, M. E. R., & Loftus, A. M. (2007). Pseudoneglect and neglect for mental alphabet lines. Brain Research, 1152, 130–138.
Nicholls, M. E. R., & Roberts, G. R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Cortex, 38, 113–136.
Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., & Mesulam, M. M. (1999). Orbitofrontal cortex is activated during breaches of expectation in tasks of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 11–12.
Park, S. J., Intraub, H., Yi, D.-J., Widders, D., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Beyond the edges of a view: Boundary extension in human scene-selective visual cortex. Neuron, 54, 335–342.
Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107–123.
Pollack, I. (1970). A nonparametric procedure for evaluation of true and false positives. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 2, 155–156.
Pollack, I., & Norman, D. A. (1964). A nonparametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125–126.
Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain & Language, 14, 174–180.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
Schmidt, G. L., DeBuse, C. J., & Seger, C. A. (2007). Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain & Language, 100, 127–141.
Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M., & Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 475–491.
Siman-Tov, T., Mendelsohn, A., Schonberg, T., Avidan, G., Podlipsky, I., Pessoa, L., et al. (2007). Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 11271–11278.
Snodgrass, J. G., Volvovitz, R., & Walfish, E. R. (1972). Recognition memory for words, pictures, and words 1 pictures. Psychonomic Science, 27, 345–347.
Spalek, T. M., & Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science, 16, 15–18.
Varnava, A., & Halligan, P. W. (2007). Influence of age and sex on line bisection: A study of normal performance with implications for visuospatial neglect. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 14, 571–585.
Volberg, G., & Hübner, R. (2004). On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1805–1813.
Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M.-M. (1987). Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention: Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. Archives of Neurology, 44, 621–625.
Williams, D. E., & Reingold, E. M. (2001). Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 476–488.
Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain & Language, 24, 326–358.
Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36, 2177–2187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant RO1MH54688 (to H.I.).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dickinson, C.A., Intraub, H. Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: Consequences of an attentional bias?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 1251–1262 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.6.1251
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.6.1251