Abstract
Students, faculty, and researchers have become increasingly comfortable with the Internet, and many of them are interestedin using the Web to collectdata. Few published studies have investigated the differences between Web-based data and data collected with more traditional methods. In order to investigate these potential differences, two important factors were crossed in this study: whether the data were collected on line or not and whether the data were collected in a group setting at a fixed time or individually at a time of the respondent’s choosing. The Visions of Morality scale (Shelton & McAdams, 1990) was used, and the participants were assigned to one of four conditions: in-class Web survey, in-class paper-and-pencil survey; take-home Web survey, and take-home paper-and-pencil survey. No significant differences in scores were found for any condition; however, response rates were affected by the type of survey administered, with the take-home Web-based instrument having the lowest response rate. Therefore, researchers need to be aware that different modes of administration may affect subject attrition and may, therefore, confound investigations of other independent variables.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Birnbaum, M. H. (2000). SurveyWiz and FactorWiz: JavaScript Web pages that make HTML forms for research on the Internet.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 339–346.
Borenstein, M., Rothstein, H., &Cohen, J. (1997).SamplePower (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
Buchanan, T. (2000). Potential of the Internet for personality research. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.),Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 121–140). San Diego: Academic Press.
Buchanan, T., &Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the internet: Validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 565–571.
Carlsmith, K. M., &Chabot, H. F. (1997). A review of computer-based survey methodology.Journal of Psychological Practice,3, 20–26.
Davis, R. N. (1999). Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 572–577.
Hallfors, D., Khatapoush, S., Kadushin, C., Watson, K., &Saxe, L. (2000). A comparison of paper vs. computer-assisted self interview for school alcohol, tobacco, and other drug surveys.Evaluation & Program Planning,23, 149–155.
Joinson, A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 433–438.
O’Neill, K. M., &Penrod, S. D. (2001). Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 226–233.
Pasveer, K. A., &Ellard, J. H. (1998). The making of a personality inventory: Help from the WWW.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers,30, 309–313.
Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., &Edwards, J.E. (1993). Computer-administered surveys in organizational settings: Alternatives, advantages, and applications.American Behavioral Scientist,36, 485–511.
Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., Edwards, J. E., &Thomas, M. D. (1996). Responses on computer surveys: Impression management, social desirability, and the Big Brother syndrome.Computers in Human Behavior,12, 263–274.
Schmidt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 274–279.
Shelton, C. M., &McAdams, D. P. (1990). In search of an everyday morality: The development of a measure.Adolescence,25, 923–943.
Stanton, J. M. (1998). An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet.Personnel Psychology,51, 709–725.
Vispoel, W. P. (2000). Computerized versus paper-and-pencil assessment of self-concept: Score comparability and respondent preferences.Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development,33, 130–144.
Vispoel, W. P., Boo, J., &Bleiler, T. (2001). Computerized and paper and pencil versions of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: A comparison of psychometric features and respondent preferences.Educational & Psychological Measurement,61, 461–474.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cronk, B.C., West, J.L. Personality research on the Internet: A comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 177–180 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195440
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195440