Next Article in Journal
Benefits, Issues, and Recommendations for Personalized Medicine in Oncology in Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference: Standards of Care for the Treatment of Patients with Rectal, Pancreatic, and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Oncofertility in Canada: An Overview of Canadian Practice and Suggested Action Plan

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
2
McGill University Health Centre, Reproductive Centre, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20(5), 465-474; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1361
Submission received: 2 July 2013 / Revised: 3 August 2013 / Accepted: 4 September 2013 / Published: 1 October 2013

Abstract

Background: Cancer can be a devastating diagnosis. In particular, malignancy and its indicated treatments have profoundly negative effects on the fertility of young cancer patients. Oncofertility has emerged as a new interdisciplinary field to address the issue of gonadotoxicity associated with cancer therapies and to facilitate fertility preservation. In Canada, these fertility issues are often inadequately addressed despite the availability of resources. The goal of this four-part series is to facilitate systemic improvements in fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult Canadians with a new diagnosis of cancer. Methods: Here, we describe the services currently available in Canada and the challenges associated with their utilization. Finally, we outline strategies to help maximize and facilitate fertility preservation in the young cancer patient. Results: Despite an existing infrastructure to the oncofertility system in Canada, the ability of that system’s components to function together and to coordinate patient care is a challenge. Areas of weakness include poor access and referral to fertility services, a lack of readily available education for patients and health care providers, and inconsistent interdisciplinary coordination in patient care. Conclusions: The implementation of a framework for multidisciplinary resource allocation, education, patient referral, and established lines of communication may facilitate a functional oncofertility system in Canada.
Keywords: oncofertility; fertility preservation; cryopreservation; gonadotoxicity; young adult; adolescent oncofertility; fertility preservation; cryopreservation; gonadotoxicity; young adult; adolescent

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ronn, R.; Holzer, H.E.G. Oncofertility in Canada: An Overview of Canadian Practice and Suggested Action Plan. Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20, 465-474. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1361

AMA Style

Ronn R, Holzer HEG. Oncofertility in Canada: An Overview of Canadian Practice and Suggested Action Plan. Current Oncology. 2013; 20(5):465-474. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ronn, R., and H.E.G. Holzer. 2013. "Oncofertility in Canada: An Overview of Canadian Practice and Suggested Action Plan" Current Oncology 20, no. 5: 465-474. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1361

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop