Next Article in Journal
Management of a Suspicious Adnexal Mass: A Clinical Practice Guideline
Previous Article in Journal
Multidisciplinary Management of Cancer Patients: Chasing a Shadow or Real Value? An Overview of the Literature
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use and Delivery of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy—Single-Centre Experience

1
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2
Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
3
Statistical consultant, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2012, 19(4), 239-243; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.948
Submission received: 1 August 2012 / Revised: 1 August 2012 / Accepted: 1 August 2012 / Published: 1 August 2012

Abstract

Background: Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) as primary prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has significant cost implications. We examined use of g-csf for early-stage breast cancer patients at our centre. The study also examined the pattern of nurse-led patient teaching with respect to drug self-administration. Methods: Patients who received g-csf between November 2009 and October 2010 were identified from pharmacy records. After consent had been obtained, electronic charts were examined to extract data on chemotherapy and use of g-csf. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain information on the utilization of home-care nursing visits for g-csf administration. Results: The study analyzed 36 patients. Median age was 58 years (range: 31–78 years). Of the 36 patients, 30 (83%) had received adjuvant treatment, and 6 (17%), neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (71%) received 10 days (range: 7–10 days) of filgrastim. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) received g-csf as primary prophylaxis. In 90% of those patients, primary prophylaxis commenced with the taxane component of treatment. Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) received g-csf after neutropenia, including 2 who had febrile neutropenia. In 96% of the patients, injections were received at home with the help of a nurse; those patients were subsequently taught self-injection techniques. The median number of nursing visits was 2 (range: 1–3 visits). Most patients were satisfied with the home care and g-csf teaching they received. Conclusions: Most of the g-csf used in breast cancer treatment during the study period was given for primary prophylaxis. A major reason for the decision to use g-csf appears to have been physician-perceived risk of febrile neutropenia. Delivery of g-csf by home-care nurses was well received by patients.
Keywords: growth factor; breast cancer; chemotherapy; neutropenia; febrile neutropenia; prophylaxis; drug administration growth factor; breast cancer; chemotherapy; neutropenia; febrile neutropenia; prophylaxis; drug administration

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, X.; Bouganim, N.; Vandermeer, L.; Dent, S.F.; Dranitsaris, G.; Clemons, M.J. Use and Delivery of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy—Single-Centre Experience. Curr. Oncol. 2012, 19, 239-243. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.948

AMA Style

Zhu X, Bouganim N, Vandermeer L, Dent SF, Dranitsaris G, Clemons MJ. Use and Delivery of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy—Single-Centre Experience. Current Oncology. 2012; 19(4):239-243. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.948

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, X., N. Bouganim, L. Vandermeer, S.F. Dent, G. Dranitsaris, and M.J. Clemons. 2012. "Use and Delivery of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy—Single-Centre Experience" Current Oncology 19, no. 4: 239-243. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.948

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop