Next Article in Journal
Oncology Education in Canadian Undergraduate and Postgraduate Medical Programs: A Survey of Educators and Learners
Previous Article in Journal
Qualitative Evaluation of Care Plans for Canadian Breast and Head-and-Neck Cancer Survivors
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extracellular–to–Body Cell Mass Ratio and Subjective Global Assessment in Head-and-Neck Cancers

by
T. Małecka–Massalska
1,*,
A. Smoleń
2 and
K. Morshed
3
1
Physiology Department, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
2
Mathematics and Biostatistics Department, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
3
Otolaryngology Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21(1), 62-66; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1671
Submission received: 7 November 2013 / Revised: 8 December 2013 / Accepted: 10 January 2014 / Published: 1 February 2014

Abstract

Background: The ratio of extracellular mass to body cell mass (ecm/bcm), determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis, has been found to be a potentially useful indicator of nutrition status. Subjective global assessment (sga) is a subjective method of evaluating nutrition status in head-and-neck cancer. The present study was conducted to investigate the association between ecm/bcm and sga in head-and-neck cancer. Methods: Patients were classified as either well-nourished or malnourished by sga. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was conducted on a population of 75 patients with histologically confirmed head-and-neck cancer, and the ecm/bcm was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were estimated using the nonparametric method to determine an optimal cut-off value of the ecm/bcm. Results: Compared with malnourished patients, those who were well-nourished had a statistically significantly lower ecm/bcm (1.11 vs. 1.28, p = 0.005). An ecm/bcm cut-off of 1.194 was 76% sensitive and 63% specific in detecting malnutrition. Conclusions: The ecm/bcm can be an indicator that detects malnutrition in patients with head-and-neck cancer. Further observations are needed to validate the significance of the ecm/bcm and to monitor nutrition interventions.
Keywords: head-and-neck cancer; bioelectrical impedance analysis; extracellular–to–body cell mass ratio; subjective global assessment head-and-neck cancer; bioelectrical impedance analysis; extracellular–to–body cell mass ratio; subjective global assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Małecka–Massalska, T.; Smoleń, A.; Morshed, K. Extracellular–to–Body Cell Mass Ratio and Subjective Global Assessment in Head-and-Neck Cancers. Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21, 62-66. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1671

AMA Style

Małecka–Massalska T, Smoleń A, Morshed K. Extracellular–to–Body Cell Mass Ratio and Subjective Global Assessment in Head-and-Neck Cancers. Current Oncology. 2014; 21(1):62-66. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Małecka–Massalska, T., A. Smoleń, and K. Morshed. 2014. "Extracellular–to–Body Cell Mass Ratio and Subjective Global Assessment in Head-and-Neck Cancers" Current Oncology 21, no. 1: 62-66. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1671

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop