151
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Psychological control by parents is associated with a higher child weight

, , &
Pages 442-449 | Received 24 Nov 2010, Published online: 22 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. In this examination of the association between parenting style and child weight, the neglected concept of ‘psychological control’ has been added to the generally accepted parenting dimensions ‘support’ and ‘behavioural control’. Also explored is whether the potential association between parenting and child weight is moderated by socio-demographic variables (child's age/ethnicity, and parent's education level). Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed among 1,665 parent-child dyads. The children's mean age was 8 years. Their height and weight were measured to calculate their body mass index (BMI). Parents completed a questionnaire to measure the three parenting dimensions. Based on these dimensions, five parenting styles were defined: the authoritative, permissive, authoritarian, neglecting and rejecting parenting style. Child BMI z-scores were regressed on parenting style, adjusting for parental BMI, child ethnicity, and parent's education level. Results. Rejecting parenting, characterized by high psychological control, low support and low behavioural control, is the only parenting style significantly related to child BMI z-scores (β = 0.074, p < 0.001). The positive association was not moderated by socio-demographic variables. Conclusions. By adding the dimension of psychological control to the concept of parenting, this study has further elucidated the mechanisms whereby parenting may affect child weight. Demonstrating that ‘rejecting parenting’ is associated with a higher child weight, emphasizes the need for longitudinal studies in which parenting style is measured three-dimensionally. Potential mediating effects of parental feeding style and children's eating style, as well as age moderation, should be included in these studies.

Acknowledgements

Financial support for the INPACT study was provided by ZonMw, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (grant ID no. 121010011). All research by G. Rodenburg is financed by IVO Addiction Research Institute Rotterdam and by the Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam. None of the funding sources had any influence on the data analyses, interpretation and presentation.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.