Are health professionals ready for direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing?

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

References

• 1  Garraway LA. Genomics-driven oncology: framework for an emerging paradigm. J. Clin. Oncol.319(15),1806–1814 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 2  Travers ME, McCarthy MI. Type 2 diabetes and obesity: genomics and the clinic. Hum. Genet.130(1),41–58 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3  Ware JS, Roberts AM, Cook SA. Next-generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics and personalised medicine: implications for the next generation cardiologist. Heart98(4),276–281 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4  Whitcomb DC. What is personalized medicine and what should it replace? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol.9(7),418–424 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5  Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, Tibben A. Quality in genetic counseling for presymptomatic testing – clinical guidelines for practice across the range of genetic conditions. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.21(3),256–260 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6  Damani SB, Topol EJ. Emerging genomic applications in coronary artery disease. JACC4(5),473–482 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 7  McKillop AM, Flatt PR. Emerging applications of metabolomic and genomic profiling in diabetic clinical medicine. Diabetes Care34(12),2624–2630 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8  Lea DH, Skirton H, Read CY, Williams JK. Implications for educating the next generation of nurses on genetics and genomics in the 21st century. J. Nurs. Scholarch.43(1),3–12 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9  Skirton H, Goldsmith G, Jackson L, O’Connor A, Lewis C, Chitty LC. Offering prenatal diagnostic tests – European guidelines for clinical practice. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. (2013) (In Press).
  Google Scholar
• 10  Scully JL, Porz R, Rehmann-Sutter C. You don’t make genetic test decisions from one day to the next’ – using time to preserve moral space. Bioethics21(4),208–217 (2007).▪ Explores the way in which patients make decisions regarding genetic testing generally.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11  Fulda KG, Lykens K. Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective. J. Med. Ethics32(3),143–147 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12  Martin DK, Greenwood HL, Nisker J. Public perceptions of ethical issues regarding adult predictive genetic testing. Health Care Anal.18(2),103–112 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13  Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2009).
  Google Scholar
• 14  Houwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Jan Dinant G, Cornel MC. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Fam. Pract.12,5–5 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15  Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD. Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet.8(2),151–157 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16  Robson ME, Storm CD, Weitzel J, Wollins DS, Offit K. American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. J. Clin. Oncol.28(5),893–901 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17  McGowan M, Fishman J, Lambrix M. Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users. New Genet. Soc.29,261–290 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18  Hay J, Kaphingst KA, Baser R, Li Y, Hensley-Alford S, McBride CM. Skin cancer concerns and genetic risk information-seeking in primary care. Public Health Genomics15(2),57–72 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19  Claassen L, Henneman L, de Vet R, Knol D, Marteau T, Timmermans D. Fatalistic responses to different types of genetic risk information: exploring the role of self-malleability. Psychol. Health25(2),183–196 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 20  Meisel SF, Walker C, Wardle J. Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study. Obesity (Silver Spring)20(3),540–546 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21  Williams-Jones B. Where there’s a web, there’s a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet. Community Genet.6(1),46–57 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22  Francke U, Dijamco C, Kiefer AK et al. Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing. PeerJ1,e8 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23  Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Byrski T et al. Direct-to-patient BRCA1 testing: the Twoj Styl experience. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.100(3),239–245 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24  Li C. Personalized medicine – the promised land: are we there yet? Clin. Genet.79(5),403–412 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25  Yang Q, Flanders WD, Moonesinghe R, Ioannidis JPA, Guessous I, Khoury MJ. Using lifetime risk estimates in personal genomic profiles: estimation of uncertainty. Am. J. Hum. Genet.85(6),786–800 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26  Hennen L, Sauter A, van Den Cruyce E. Direct to consumer genetic testing: insights from an internet scan. New Genet. Soc.29(2),167–186 (2010).
  Google Scholar
• 27  Harris A, Kelly S, Wyatt S. Counseling customers: emerging roles for genetic counselors in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market. J. Genetic Couns.22(2),277–288 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28  Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet.2(7),499–510 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 29  Schuster SC. Next-generation sequencing transforms today’s biology. Nat. Methods5(1),16–18 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30  Bansal V, Tewhey R, Leproust EM, Schork NJ. Efficient and cost effective population resequencing by pooling and in-solution hybridization. PLoS ONE6(3),e18353 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31  Bonetta L. Getting up close and personal with your genome. Cell133(5),753–756 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32  Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O’Connor A, Skirton H. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.20(8),811–816 (2012).▪▪ Systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33  Bollinger JM, Green RC, Kaufman D. Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers. Genet. Test Mol. Biomarkers17(5),424–428 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34  Baldor R. Ethical considerations in disease management: a managed care perspective. Disease Manag. Health Out.11(2),71–75 (2003).
  Google Scholar
• 35  Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C et al. Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics15(1),22–30 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36  Cherkas LF, Harris JM, Levinson E, Spector TD, Prainsack B. A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS ONE5(10),e13473 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37  Su Y, Howard H, Borry P. Users’ motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories. J. Comm. Genet.2,135–146 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38  Borry P, van Hellemondt RE, Sprumont D et al. Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.20(7),715–721 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39  Armstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH et al. The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing. Med. Care50(5),381–387 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40  Skirton H, Patch C. Factors affecting the clinical use of noninvasive prenatal testing: a mixed methods systematic review. Prenat. Diag.33(6),532–541 (2013).▪▪ Focuses on the use of noninvasive prenatal testing from user and professional perspectives.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41  Chitty LS, Bianchi DW. Noninvasive prenatal testing: the paradigm is shifting. Prenat. Diag.33(6),511–513 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 42  Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O’Connor A. Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations. Clin. Genet.82(3),210–218 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43  Foster MW, Sharp RR. Out of sequence: how consumer genomics could displace clinical genetics. Nat. Rev. Genetics9(6),419–419 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44  Weaver M, Pollin T. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: what are we talking about? J. Genet. Couns.21(3),361–366 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45  Veach P, Leroy B. Defining moments in genetic counselor professional development: one decade later. J. Genet. Couns.21(2),162–166 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 46  Lea DH, Williams JK, Cooksey JA, Flanagan PA, Forte G, Blitzer MG. US genetics nurses in advanced practice. J. Nurs. Scholarch.38(3),213–218 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 47  Skirton H, Kerzin-Storrar L, Barnes C et al. Building the genetic counsellor profession in the United Kingdom: two decades of growth and development. J. Genet. Couns. doi:10.1007/s10897-012-9560-4 (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
  Google Scholar
• 48  Skirton H, Arimori N, Aoki M. A historical comparison of the development of specialist genetic nursing in the United Kingdom and Japan. Nurs. Health Sci.8(4),231–236 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 49  Cordier C, Lambert D, Voelckel M-A, Hosterey-Ugander U, Skirton H. A profile of the genetic counsellor and genetic nurse profession in European countries. J. Comm. Genet.3(1),19–24 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 50  Houwink EJF, Henneman L, Westerneng M et al. Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study. Genet. Med.14(3),323–329 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 51  Houwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Jan Dinant G, Cornel MC. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Family Practice12,5 (2011).▪▪ One of few papers with input on genetics education from the health professional perspective.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 52  Ram S, Russell B, Gubb M et al. General practitioner attitudes to direct-to-consumer genetic testing in New Zealand. N. Z. Med. J.125(1364),14–26 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 53  Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O’Connor A, Skirton H. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature. J. Comm. Genet.4(2),169–180 (2013).▪ Review of current evidence on the topic.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 54  Hock KT, Christensen KD, Yashar BM, Roberts JS, Gollust SE, Uhlmann WR. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors’ knowledge and beliefs. Genet. Med.13(4),325–332 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55  Skirton H, Lewis C, Kent A, Coviello DA. Genetic education and the challenge of genomic medicine: development of core competences to support preparation of health professionals in Europe. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.18(9),972–977 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 56  Baars MJ, Henneman L, Ten Kate LP. Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genet. Med.7(9),605–610 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 57  Baars MJ, Scherpbier AJA, Schuwirth LW et al. Deficient knowledge of genetics relevant for daily practice among medical students nearing graduation. Genet. Med.7(5),295–301 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 58  Bonter K, Desjardins C, Currier N, Pun J, Ashbury FD. Personalised medicine in Canada: a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine. BMJ Open1(1),e000110 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 59  Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA et al. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.91(3),450–458 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60  Powell KP, Christianson CA, Cogswell WA et al. Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J. Genet. Couns.21(3),469–478 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 61  Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O’Connor A, Skirton H. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature. J. Comm. Genet.4(2),169–180 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 62  Skirton H, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, O’Connor A. Gudiance for patients considering direct-to-comsumer gentic testing and health profesionals involved in their care; development of a practical decision tool. Fam. Prac. (2013) (In Press).
  Google Scholar
• 63  Godino L, Skirton H. A systematic review of nurses’ knowledge of genetics. J. Nurs. Educ. Prac.2(3), doi:10.5430/jnep.v2n3p173 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 64  Godino L, Turchetti D, Skirton H. Knowledge of genetics and the role of the nurse in genetic health care: a survey of Italian nurses. J. Adv. Nurs.69(5),1125–1135 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 65  Skirton H, Murakami K, Tsujino K, Kutsunugi S, Turale S. Genetic competence of midwives in the UK and Japan. Nurs. Health Sci.12(3),292–303 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 66  Williams JK, Prows CA, Conley YP, Eggert J, Kirk M, Nichols F. Strategies to prepare faculty to integrate genomics into nursing education programs. J. Nurs. Scholarch.43(3),231–238 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 101  23andMe. www.23andme.com
  Google Scholar
• 102  Kanellos M. Moore’s Law to roll on for another decade (2003). http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-984051.html
  Google Scholar
• 103  Illumina. www.illumina.com
  Google Scholar
• 104  Life Technologies. www.invitrogen.com
  Google Scholar
• 105  Molecular genetics. The Leeds Teaching Hospitals. www.leedsth.nhs.uk
  Google Scholar
• 106  DNA DTC. Next-generation sequencing services. www.dnadtc.com
  Google Scholar
• 107  Genomics law report. DNA DTC: the return of direct-to-consumer whole-genome sequencing (2012). www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2012/11/29/dna-dtc-the-return-of-direct-to-consumer-whole-genome-sequencing
  Google Scholar
• 108  Cesagen: ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genetics: report on the direct-to-consumer genetic testing industry (2010). www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/media/T1%20-%20Personal%20Genomics%20Link%20PDF.pdf
  Google Scholar
• 109  Nimble Diagnostics. www.nimblediagnostics.co.uk/home/gen.html
  Google Scholar
• 110  American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome (2013). www.acmg.net/docs/ACMG_Releases_Highly-Anticipated_Recommendations_on_Incidental_Findings_in_Clinical_Exome_and_Genome_Sequencing.pdf
  Google Scholar
• 111  Heger M. Debate heats up on ACMG’s incidental findings recommendations (2013). www.genomeweb.com/clinical-genomics/debate-heats-acmgs-incidental-findings-recommendations
  Google Scholar