The genomic medicine model: an integrated approach to implementation of family health history in primary care

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

References

• 1  Rubenstein WS. Family history and health risk assessment tools. In: Genomic and Personalized Medicine (2nd Edition). Ginsburg HF (Ed.). Academic Press, MA, USA (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 2  Berg AO, Baird MA, Botkin JR et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science conference statement: family history and improving health. Ann. Intern. Med.151,878–885 (2009).▪▪ Outlines the potential utility, major challenges and information gaps that currently exist and which must be filled in order to evaluate and implement the wider use of family health history (FHH) in primary care.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3  Doerr M, Teng K. Family history: still relevant in the genomics era. Cleve. Clin. J. Med.79(5),331–336 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4  Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad. Med.75(8),850–852 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5  Gramling R, Nash J, Siren K, Eaton C, Culpepper L. Family physician self-efficacy with screening for inherited cancer risk. Ann. Fam. Med.2(2),130–132 (2004).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6  Qureshi N, Wilson B, Santaguida P et al. Family history and improving health. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Full Rep.)186,1–135 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7  Wilson BJ, Qureshi N, Santaguida P et al. Systematic review: family history in risk assessment for common diseases. Ann. Intern. Med.151(12),878–885 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8  Audrain-Mcgovern J, Hughes C, Patterson F. Effecting behavior change: awareness of family history. Am. J. Prev. Med.24(2),183–189 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9  Qureshi N, Carroll JC, Wilson B et al. The current state of cancer family history collection tools in primary care: a systematic review. Genet. Med.11(7),495–506 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10  Reid GT, Walter FM, Brisbane JM, Emery JD. Family history questionnaires designed for clinical use: a systematic review. Public Health Genomics12(2),73–83 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11  O’Neill SM, Starzyk EJ, Kattezham RA, Rubenstein WS. Comparison of family healthware and physicians’ family history documentation among 1124 patients. Presented at: the American Society of Human Genetics. Philadelphia, PA, USA, 11–15 November 2008.
  Google Scholar
• 12  Heald B, Edelman E, Eng C. Prospective comparison of family medical history with personal genome screening for risk assessment of common cancers. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.20(5),547–551 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13  Qureshi N, Armstrong S, Dhiman P et al. Effect of adding systematic family history enquiry to cardiovascular disease risk assessment in primary care: a matched-pair, cluster randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med.156(4),253–262 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14  Barrison AF, Smith C, Oviedo J, Heeren T, Schroy PC 3rd. Colorectal cancer screening and familial risk: a survey of internal medicine residents’ knowledge and practice patterns. Am. J. Gastroenterol.98(6),1410–1416 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15  Murff HJ, Byrne D, Syngal S. Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. Am. J. Prev. Med.27(3),239–245 (2004).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16  Downing GJ, Boyle SN, Brinner KM, Osheroff JA. Information management to enable personalized medicine: stakeholder roles in building clinical decision support. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak.9,44 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17  Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ330(7494),765 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18  Christianson CC. The Genomedical Connection: on-line education program on genomic medicine for primary care providers. In: National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics. Bethesda, MD, USA (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 19  Hahn S, Letvak S, Powell K et al. A community’s awareness and perceptions of genomic medicine. Public Health Genomics13(2),63–71 (2010).▪ Assesses a community’s attitudes and knowledge about genetics and the use of family history and found that education level, age and previous medical experience with a familial disease were major drivers for community interest in genomic medicine.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20  Christianson CA, Powell KP, Hahn SE et al. Findings from a community education needs assessment to facilitate the integration of genomic medicine into primary care. Genet. Med.12(9),587–593 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21  Christianson CA, Powell KP, Hahn SE, Blanton SH, Bogacik J, Henrich VC. The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers. J. Genet. Couns.21(5),652–661 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22  Knowles M. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy (2nd Edition). Cambridge Books, NY, USA (1980).▪▪ Outlines the basic tenets of the Health Belief Model and the importance of understanding the perceptions that must be considered when thinking about what is necessary to motivate patients to take action concerning their own health.
  Google Scholar
• 23  Champion V, Skinner C. The health belief model. In: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (Eds). Wiley and Sons, NJ, USA, 45–66 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 24  Powell K, Edelson V, O’Leary J, Christianson C, Henrich V. Focus group evaluation of customized family health history education materials in a North Carolina community. Am. J. Health Educ.42,161–170 (2011).▪ Describes the basic protocols that were used to implement the genomic medicine model described in this article.
  Google Scholar
• 25  Orlando LA, Hauser ER, Christianson C et al. Protocol for implementation of family health history collection and decision support into primary care using a computerized family health history system. BMC Health Serv. Res.11,264 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26  US Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med.143(5),355–361 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27  Buller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Prins MH, Raskob GE. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest126(Suppl. 3),S401–S428 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28  Hampel H, Sweet K, Westman JA, Offit K, Eng C. Referral for cancer genetics consultation: a review and compilation of risk assessment criteria. J. Med. Genet.41(2),81–91 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29  Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology116(6),1453–1456 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30  Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J. Natl Cancer Inst.81(24),1879–1886.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31  Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O. Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am. J. Hum. Genet.62(1),145–158 (1998)
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32  Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ. Q.11(1),1–47 (1984).▪ Describes the clinical criteria for recommending referral for genetic counseling and provides information concerning the broad potential impact of FHH information for making recommendations in primary care.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33  Acheson L. Family history and genetic testing for cancer risk. Am. Fam. Physician81(8),934–938; author reply 934–938 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34  Wang C, O’Neill SM, Rothrock N et al. Comparison of risk perceptions and beliefs across common chronic diseases. Prev. Med.48(2),197–202 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35  Cohn WF, Ropka ME, Pelletier SL et al. Health Heritage, a web-based tool for the collection and assessment of family health history: initial user experience and analytic validity. Public Health Genomics13(7–8),477–491 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36  Hulse NC, Ranade-Kharkar P, Post H, Wood GM, Williams MS, Haug PJ. Development and early usage patterns of a consumer-facing family health history tool. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc.2011,578–587 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37  Sweet KM, Bradley TL, Westman JA. Identification and referral of families at high risk for cancer susceptibility. J. Clin. Oncol.20(2),528–537 (2002).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38  O’Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Wang C et al. Familial risk for common diseases in primary care: the Family Healthware Impact Trial. Am. J. Prev. Med.36(6),506–514 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39  Do CB, Hinds DA, Francke U, Eriksson N. Comparison of family history and SNPs for predicting risk of complex disease. PLoS Genet.8(10),e1002973 (2012).▪ Describes how FHH and genetic test results are complementary when stratifying patient risk levels for disease.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101  Genomedical Connection. www.genomedical.com
  Google Scholar
• 102  Area Health Education Center (AHEC) Continuing Medical Education. www.aheconnect.com
  Google Scholar