We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.14.6

SUMMARY 

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological diseases in young adults and involves inflammatory demyelination of the CNS. MS typically manifests between 20 and 40 years of age, and can lead to significant disability in some cases. The disease course is unpredictable. MS has a significant impact on families, influencing their wellbeing and quality of life, often creating psychological stress in each family member as well as on family functioning in general. Common themes include the impact of the emotional state of the person with MS on family members, the role of the healthy parent on how children cope, the effect of a lack of information about MS, communication within the family and with healthcare professionals, and the importance of assessing and treating families as a dynamic unit in order to assure comprehensive intervention plans. The current literature review is based on 30 full research articles meeting inclusion criteria related to partners/couples, family caregivers, children with a parent with MS and parents of young children with MS.

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: •of interest ••of considerable interest

References

  • 1 Sadovnick AD, Ebers GCEpidemiology of multiple sclerosis: a critical reviewCan. J. Neurol. Sci. 20, 17–29 (1993).
  • 2 Feinstein A. Mood disorders in multiple sclerosis and the effects on cognition. J. Neurol. Sci. 245 (1–2), 63–66 (2006).
  • 3 Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP  et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I Clinical course and disabilityBrain 112(Pt 1), 133–146 (1989).
  • 4 Pfleger CCH, Flachs EM, Koch-Henriksen N. Social consequences of multiple sclerosis. Part 2. Divorce and separation: a historical prospective cohort study. Mult. Scler. 16(7), 878–882 (2010).
  • 5 Glantz MJ, Chamberlain MC, Liu Q et al. Gender disparity in the rate of partner abandonment in patients with serious medical illness. Cancer 115, 5237–5242 (2009).
  • 6 O’Connor EJ, McCabe MP. The impact of neurological illness on marital relationships. J. Sex Marital Ther.34, 115–113 (2008).
  • 7 McPheters JK, Sandberg JG. The relationship among couple relationship quality, physical functioning, and depression in multiple sclerosis patients and partners. Fam. Syst. Health 28(1), 48–68 (2010).
  • Bogosian A, Moss-Morris R, Yardley L, Dennison L. Experiences of partners of people in the early stages of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 15, 876–884 (2009). .•• Explores partners’ experiences of living with someone in the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS) using in-depth telephone interviews
  • 9 Mutch K. In sickness and in health: experience of caring for a spouse with MS. British J. Nurs. 19(4), 214–219 (2010).
  • 10 Bjorgvinsdottir K, Halldorsdottir S. Silent, invisible and unacknowledged: experiences of young caregivers of single parents diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 28(1), 38–48 (2013).
  • 11 Starks H, Morris MA, Yorkston KM, Gray RP, Johnson KLBeing in- or out-of-sync: couples’ adaptation to change in multiple sclerosisDisabil. Rehabil. 32(3), 196–206 (2010). • Combines postal questionnaires and interviews to identify the characteristics and coping styles of couples who cope successfully with MS and those who do not.
  • 12 Boland P, Levack WMM, Hudson S, Bell EM. Coping with multiple sclerosis as a couple: 'peaks and troughs' – an interpretative phenomenological exploration. Disabil. Rehabil. 34(16), 1367–1375 (2012).
  • 13 Liedstöm E, Isaksson A, Ahlstrom G. Quality of life in spite of an unpredictable future: the next of kin of patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 42(6), 331–341 (2010).
  • 14 Hileman J, Lackey N, Hassanien R. Identifying the needs of home caregivers of patients with cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 19, 771–777 (1992).
  • 15 O’Connor EJ, McCabe MP. Predictors of quality of life in carers for people with progressive neurological illness: a longitudinal study. Qual. Life Res. 20, 703–711 (2011).
  • 16 Argyriou AA, Karanasios P, Ifanti AA et al. Quality of life and emotional burden of primary caregivers: a case–control study of multiple sclerosis patients in Greece. Qual. Life Res. 29, 1663–1668 (2011).
  • 17 Akkus Y. Multiple sclerosis patient caregivers: the relationship between their psychological and social needs and burden levels. Disabil. Rehabil. 33(4), 326–333 (2011).
  • 18 Buchanan R, Huang C. Health-related quality of life among informal caregivers assisting people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 33(2), 113–121 (2011).
  • 19 Aymerich A, Guillamòn I, Jovell AJ. Health-related quality of life assessment in people with multiple sclerosis and their family caregivers. A multicenter study in Catalonia (Southern Europe). Patient Prefer. Adherence 3, 311–321 (2009).
  • 20 Rivera-Navarro JR, Benito-Leòn J, Oreja-Guevara C et al. Burden and health-related quality of life of Spanish caregivers of persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 15(11), 1347–1355 (2009).
  • 21 Lehan T, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Distress associated with patients’ symptoms and depression in a sample of Mexican caregivers of individuals with MS. Rehabil. Psychol. 57(4), 301–307 (2012).
  • 22 Argyriou AA, Karanasios P, Assimakopoulos K et al. Assessing the quality of sleep in Greek primary caregivers of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 42(4), 541–547 (2011).
  • 23 Alshubaili AF, Ohaeri JU, Awadalla AW, Mabrouk AA. Family caregiver quality of life in multiple sclerosis among Kuwaitis: a controlled study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2008; 8, 206–214.
  • 24 Buchanan RJ, Radin D, Chakravorty BJ, Tyry TInformal care giving to more disabled people with multiple sclerosisDisabil. Rehabil. 31(15), 1244–1256 (2009).• Investigates the experience of family caregivers of people with a more advanced MS disease course using telephone interviews.
  • 25 Buchanan RJ, Huang C. Caregiver perceptions of accomplishment from assisting people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 34(1), 53–61 (2012).
  • 26 Pakenham KI. The nature of sense making in caregiving for persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 30(17), 1263–1273 (2008).
  • 27 Ackroyd K, Fortune DG, Price S, Howell S, Sharrack B, Isaac CL. Adversarial growth in patients with multiple sclerosis and their partners: relationships with illness perceptions, disability and distress. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 18, 372–379 (2011).
  • 28 Turpin M, Leech C, Hackenberg LLiving with parental MS: Children's experiences and clinical implicationsCanadian J. Occupational Ther. 75(3), 149–156 (2008). .•• Utilizing videotaped semistructured interviews, the study investigates how very young children with a parent diagnosed with MS experience everyday occupational roles and what coping strategies they use.
  • 29 Bogosian A, Moss-Morris R, Bishop FL, Hadwin JHow do adolescents adjust to their parent's multiple sclerosis? An interview studyBritish J. Health Psych. 16, 430–444 (2011).•• Through semistructured interviews the study defines barriers and enhancements to adjustment and the impact on everyday life in adolescents with a parent diagnosed with MS.
  • 30 Pakenham KI, Cox S. Test of a model of the effects of parental illness on youth and family functioning. Health Psychol. 31(5), 580–590 (2012).
  • 31 Bowen C, MacLehose A, Beaumont JG. Advanced multiple sclerosis and the psychosocial impact on families. Psychol. Health 26(1), 113–127 (2011).
  • 32 Pakenham KI, Cox SThe nature of caregiving in children of a parent with multiple sclerosis from multiple sources and the associations between caregiving activities and youth adjustment overtimePsychol. Health 27(3), 324–346 (2012).• This quantitative, longitudinal study assesses four different categories of caregiving responsibilities and their influence on how children adjust over time to caring for a parent with MS.
  • 33 Ehrensperger MM, Grether A, Romer G et al. Neuropsychological dysfunction, depression, physical disability, and coping processes in families with a parent affected by multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler.14, 1106–1112 (2008).
  • 34 Messmer Uccelli M, Traversa S, Trojano M, Viterbo RG, Ghezzi A, Signori A. Lack of information about multiple sclerosis in children can impact parents’ sense of competency and satisfaction within the couple. J. Neurol. Sci. 324, 100–105 (2013).