Abstract
Delirium is a common problem, mostly affecting older patients in hospital, which results in greater mortality, nursing-home placement and cognitive and functional impairment. Delirium can be triggered by a wide range of conditions, treatments and procedures, as well as by certain environments. Some hospital environments have been causally implicated, but until it was possible to compare treatment in-hospital with treatment in other places, the observation remained at the level of an association. However, the development of ‘Hospital in the Home’ services has allowed clinicians to explore this question scientifically. Recently, a number of studies comparing treatment of acute conditions, both medical and surgical, and rehabilitation in hospital with treatment at home, have found a lower incidence of delirium with home treatment, as well as lower rates of the sequelae of delirium. Since delirium is an indicator of a wide range of subsequent poor outcomes, this information has broad implications for the delivery of hospital-level services to older patients, and means that health services should seek to provide Hospital in the Home services wherever older patients are treated.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of considerable interest (••) to readers.
Bibliography
- 1 Health, United States, 2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. 2007-0152. Hyattsville, MD, USA (2007).
- 2 Caplan GA, Brown A: Post acute care: can hospitals do better with less? Aust. Health Rev.20,43–54 (1997).
- 3 Egerton N, Kay JH: Psychological disturbances associated with open heart surgery. Br. J. Psychiatr.110,433–439 (1964).
- 4 Pun BT, Ely EW: The importance of diagnosing and managing ICU delirium. Chest132,624–636 (2007).
- 5 Inouye SK: Delirium in older persons. N. Engl. J. Med.354,1157–1165 (2006).
- 6 Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Charpentier PA et al.: A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N. Engl. J. Med.340,669–676 (1999).
- 7 Caplan GA, Harper E: Recruitment of volunteers to improve vitality in the elderly (the REVIVE Study). Intern. Med. J.37,95–100 (2007).
- 8 Adler MW, Waller JJ, Creese A, Thorne SC: Randomised controlled trial of early dischare for inguinal hernia and varicose veins. J. Epidemiol. Comm. Health32,136–142 (1978).
- 9 Donald IP, Baldwin RN, Bannerjee M: Gloucester hospital-at-home: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing24,434–439 (1995).
- 10 Larkins RG, Martins TJ, Johnston CI: The boundaryless hospital – a commentary (editorial). Aust. NZ J. Med.25,169–170 (1995).
- 11 Caplan GA, Brown A: Post acute care: can hospitals do better with less? Aust. Health Rev.20,43–54 (1997).
- 12 Shepperd S, Harwood D, Jenkinson C, Gray A, Vessey M, Morgan P: Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes. Br. Med. J.316,1786–1791 (1998).
- 13 Wilson A; Parker H, Wynn A et al.: Randomised controlled trial of effectiveness of Leicester hospital at home scheme compared with hospital care. Br. Med. J.319,1542–1546 (1999).
- 14 Caplan GA, Ward JA, Brennan NJ, Coconis J, Board N, Brown A: Hospital in the home: a randomised controlled trial. Med. J. Aust.170,156–160 (1999).•• First study to identify that there are a potential range of health outcome benefits for the patient from ‘Hospital in the Home’ (HITH) treatment, rather than just savings for the health system.
- 15 Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N et al.: The nature of adverse events in hospitalised patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N. Engl. J. Med.324,377–384 (1991).
- 16 Hillman KM, Bristow PJ, Chey T et al.: Antecedents to hospital deaths. Int. Med. J.31,343–348 (2001).
- 17 Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW et al.: The quality in Australian health care study. Med. J. Aust.163,458–471 (1995).
- 18 Caplan GA. Hospital in the home: a concept under question (editorial). Med. J. Aus.184,599–600 (2006).
- 19 Canet J, Raeder J, Rasmussen LS et al.: Cognitive dysfunction after minor surgery in the elderly. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.47,1204–1210 (2003).
- 20 Leff B, Burton L, Mader SL et al.: Hospital at home: feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older patients. Ann. Int. Med.143,798–808 (2005).•• First multicenter prospective confirmation of the delirium-prevention benefits of HITH, and in a different health system.
- 21 Caplan GA, Coconis J, Board N, Sayers A, Woods J: Does home treatment affect delirium? A randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation of elderly and care at home or usual treatment (the REACH OUT trial). Age Ageing35,53–60 (2006).•• Demonstrated that delirium prevention also occurs with HITH – early discharge, as well as with HITH – admission prevention.
- 22 Harris R, Ashton T, Broad J, Connolly G, Richmond D: The effectiveness, acceptability and costs of a hospital-at-home service compared with acute hospital care: a randomized controlled trial. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy10,158–166 (2005).
- 23 Langhorne P, Taylor G, Murray G et al.: Early supported discharge services for stroke patients: a meta-analysis of individual patients’ data. Lancet365,501–506 (2005).
- 24 Caplan GA, Coconis J, Woods J: Effect of hospital in the home treatment on physical and cognitive function: a randomized controlled trial. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.60,1035–1038 (2005).
- 25 Leff B, Burton L, Burl J et al.: Return of physical function among patients eligible for home hospital treatment. The Johns Hopkins home hospital national demonstration and evaluation study. J. Am. Geriat. Soc.51(Suppl. S33) (2003).
- 26 Shepperd S, Illiffe S: Hospital at home versus in-patient care [review]. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.3,CD000356 (2005).
