Skip to main content
Log in

Metoprolol

An Updated Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy, in Hypertension, Ischaemic Heart Disease and Related Cardiovascular Disorders

  • Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Synopsis: During the intervening years since metoprolol1 was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain.

Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other β-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension.

Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with β-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in ‘high risk’ patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at ‘high risk’. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years.

Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its β1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective β-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects.

After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Pharmacodynamic Studies: Metoprolol is an established β1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist which lacks intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Thus, compared with propranolol, it has a weak inhibiting effect on isoprenaline (isoproterenol)-mediated tachycardia, and reduces exercise heart rate to a greater extent than β-blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. In hypertensive subjects metoprolol rapidly reduces systolic blood pressure, but a maximal reduction of diastolic pressure requires several weeks’ treatment. Factors predictive of the magnitude of the antihypertensive effect, and the nature of long term haemodynamic changes, are the subject of dispute. Reduction of myocardial oxygen demand, through reduced heart work, is an important effect in ischaemic heart disease. Intravenous administration to patients causes dose-related reductions in blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac output at rest and during exercise. In patients with anterior wall hypokinesia metoprolol (but not pindolol) reduced the ejection fraction. Both drugs increased hypokinetic segment shortening, but only metoprolol decreased shortening of contralateral non-hypokinetic segments. The mechanism of action of metoprolol in myocardial infarction is only partly understood. Some animal studies have reported that metoprolol reduces the evolution of hypoperfused myocardium to necrotic tissue. Animal and human electrophysiological studies have shown that metoprolol increases myocardial refractoriness. In patients with paroxysmal tachycardia a bolus injection of metoprolol increased sinus node recovery time and cycle length, right atrium to bundle of His conduction time, and A-V node refractoriness.

The effects of metoprolol in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease appear at least partially dependent on the disease type and status. When compared with atenolol single doses of both drugs equally depressed FEV1 and the terbutaline-induced increase in FEV1 in asthmatics.

The effects of metoprolol on plasma catecholamine concentrations are inconsistent and, therefore, of uncertain significance. In contrast, metoprolol reduces plasma renin activity to a similar extent as propranolol in healthy or hypertensive subjects. Blood glucose homeostasis appears largely unaffected by metoprolol. A delayed late phase of recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycaemia has been observed after single-dose metoprolol in healthy subjects, but continuous metoprolol infusion had no effect. In insulin-dependent diabetics recovery was also delayed but the extent of hypoglycaemia after insulin was not affected. The nature and significance of the long term effects of metoprolol on plasma lipids requires further study. Some authors have reported reduced plasma concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol and a tendency for low density lipoproteins to increase following 3 months’ metoprolol treatment.

Metoprolol does not appear to affect renal or hepatic blood flow in normal subjects. Portal hypertension is reduced, but to a lesser extent than after propranolol which reduces hepatic blood flow. Evidence that metoprolol inhibits platelet aggregation as well as erythrocyte viscosity and adherence to endothelial tissue is accumulating. Detrimental effects on physical performance in terms of subjective effort and capacity occur to a lesser extent after metoprolol than propranolol.

Pharmacokinetic Studies: Orally administered metoprolol is almost completely absorbed, although first-pass metabolism reduces its systemic availability by about 50%. The slow release formulations of metoprolol maintain effective plasma concentrations for 24 hours during once daily administration. However, studies in patients are required to assess any clinical advantage of this preparation. Lipophilicity and a low degree of binding to plasma proteins facilitate extensive distribution, and penetration into the central nervous system. After extensive hepatic metabolism metoprolol is excreted primarily as inactive metabolites. After oral or intravenous administratioin, about 95% of a dose is recovered in the urine within 72 hours (approximately 3% as unchanged drug). Total body clearance ranges between 43.2 and 92.4 L/h and the elimination half-life is usually 3 to 4 hours. Many studies have found evidence of polymorphic oxidation of metoprolol. On the other hand, some have shown a variable but unimodal pattern of metabolism. At present, there is no evidence that an increased incidence of adverse effects occurs in poor metabolisers of metoprolol.

Age appears to have little influence on metoprolol pharmacokinetics, but during pregnancy clearance after oral administration may increase. Like atenolol, metoprolol freely penetrates into breast milk but the estimated consumption is unlikely to affect the infant.

Unchanged metoprolol does not significantly accumulate during renal insufficiency, and it is unlikely that any increase in plasma concentrations of active metabolites contributes to pharmacological activity. In contrast, systemic availability increases during cirrhosis in association with a corresponding trend for half-life to increase and total body clearance to decrease.

The pharmacological and therapeutic effects of metoprolol are generally dose-related. However, although it is possible to relate plasma concentrations with β-blocking effects (e.g. reduction of exercise heart rate), attempts to demonstrate relationships between plasma metoprolol concentrations and therapeutic effects have generally failed.

Therapeutic Studies: Many short and several long term studies have confirmed the therapeutic efficacy and good tolerability of metoprolol in mild to moderate hypertension. Satisfactory blood pressure control is usually achieved with single or divided daily dosages of 100 to 200mg. The conventional and slow release formulations compare favourably with each other and with atenolol. Other recent comparative studies have reported that fixed or titrated regimens of metoprolol are at least as effective as treatment with several other β-blockers, labetalol, diltiazem, nifedipine or chlorthalidone. However, enalapril was superior in one study. Additional daily treatment with 25mg hydrochlorothiazide improved control of diastolic pressure. In large numbers of patients blood pressure control was well maintained for up to 1 year with metoprolol and, if required, additional diuretic treatment. Further studies are required to establish the role of metoprolol in treating elderly and pregnant hypertensives. Metoprolol is preferable to a nonselective β-blocker for treating hypertension in patients with asthma or diabetes. However, it should be realised that although the risk of bronchospasm is reduced, it is not absent when metoprolol is administered to patients with hypertension and asthma.

Clinical studies in patients with stable exertional angina have confirmed the short term efficacy of metoprolol as assessed by decreases in anginal frequency and glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin) consumption, and improvements in objective parameters such as work performance and time to onset of anginal pain during exercise. A slow release formulation of metoprolol has been introduced and once-daily administration of 200mg has been shown to be of comparable efficacy to a conventional preparation of metoprolol 100mg twice daily. Other comparative studies in patients with exertional angina pectoris have clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is superior to placebo and as effective as equivalent β-blocking doses of drugs such as propranolol, oxprenolol, practolol and tolamolol. Preliminary trials have shown metoprolol to be at least as effective as the calcium antagonists verapamil and nifedipine in stable exertional angina, while an open study found the β-blocker to be effective in some patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Metoprolol has been evaluated in large numbers of patients during the course of an evolving myocardial infarction and in patients who have suffered an acute ischaemic episode. Early intervention with β-blockers is a contentious therapeutic approach to the management of patients with a suspected impending myocardial infarction. Studies with metoprolol have not demonstrated conclusively that acute intravenous administration with this cardioselective β-blocker produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality, except for certain ‘high-risk’ groups of patients who may be difficult to identify when first treated. However, metoprolol has been well tolerated and produces definite therapeutic benefit in terms of reduction of chest pain and need for analgesic relief, decreased incidence of some tachyarrhythmias, and reduction in the number of patients in whom a threatened infarction developed into an acute event. There was also indirect evidence that it limited infarct size. If some means of identifying those patients likely to respond to immediate intervention with a β1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist can be found, then metoprolol will be a rational choice and may have an important role to play in the therapeutic management of a difficult-to-treat group of patients. In post-infarction patients metoprolol administered orally reduced total mortality. During a 3-year follow-up total mortality was 21.1% in the placebo group and 16.2% in the metoprolol group. Additionally, metoprolol significantly reduced the incidence of sudden cardiac death, the number of patients with angina pectoris or needing coronary artery bypass surgery, the incidence and complexity of chronic ventricular arrhythmias, time spent in hospital, and the number of patients who developed non-fatal reinfarctions. After 3 years some patients had their metoprolol treatment withdrawn over a period of 1 week and 31% needed reinstitution of a β-blocker to alleviate symptoms, while 21% reported improved fitness. Heart rate was increased during the first 3 weeks after withdrawal, which suggests that a rebound effect may occur and, if β-blockade is to be discontinued, it seems preferable to gradually reduce the dosage over a longer period.

Clinical evaluations of metoprolol in other therapeutic areas such as cardiac arrhythmias (treatment and prevention), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, hypotensive cardiomegaly, heart failure with associated tachycardia, and as an adjunct to sodium nitroprusside for inducing controlled hypotension during surgery have been of a preliminary nature, generally in uncontrolled clinical trials including small numbers of patients. Firm conclusions regarding its relative efficacy await further research, although some encouraging results have been reported.

Side Effects: In the majority of patients with mild to moderate hypertension or ischaemic heart disease metoprolol is a safe, well tolerated treatment. Over the course of 1 year the overall incidence of metoprolol-related side effects was 27% in more than 400 patients with hypertension. This compares favourably with the incidence of side effects associated with diuretics. Fatigue (6.2%), dizziness (3.8%) and headache (3.6%) occurred most frequently. Side effects are usually transient and necessitated withdrawal of treatment in only about 7% of patients. Slow release metoprolol does not appear to decrease the incidence or severity of side effects. The incidence of central nervous system-related side effects associated with metoprolol is similar to that with atenolol.

During 90 days of treatment with intravenous and oral metoprolol in patients with suspected myocardial infarction. 9.8 and 5.2% of patients withdrew from the metoprolol and placebo treatment groups, respectively, because of adverse cardiovascular effects. Most of these withdrawals took place during the first 11 days’ treatment and comprised hypotension (metoprolol 3.7% vs placebo 1.4%), bradycardia (2.3 vs 0.7%), atrioventricular block (2.2 vs 1.4%) and congestive heart failure (0.6 vs 1.0%). Although there was a non-significant difference in the overall withdrawal rates because of atrioventricular block, the incidence of first degree atrioventricular block was significantly greater in metoprolol-treated patients.

Some studies have demonstrated rebound cardiac chronotropic effects following sudden termination of metoprolol treatment suggesting that a gradual withdrawal over several weeks might be preferable.

Dosage and Administration: Most patients with hypertension or angina respond satisfactorily to between 100 and 200mg metoprolol daily. Dosage should be titrated for optimum individual response and may be divided or taken as a once-daily slow release formulation. For acute treatment of arrhythmias and suspected myocardial infarction, metoprolol 15mg should be administered as three 5mg intravenous doses at intervals of 5 or 2 minutes, respectively. Treatment should continue with follow-up oral administration of 100 to 200mg metoprolol daily, as divided doses. Patients who do not respond satisfactorily to metoprolol alone may benefit from additional treatment with a different class of antihypertensive, antianginal or antiarrhythmic drug. Metoprolol should be withheld from patients with impaired cardiac function. In patients with obstructive lung disease, unstable diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and in general anaesthesia metoprolol should be administered with caution, and possibly at a lower dosage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åblad B, Borg KO, Carlsson E, Johnsson G, Regårdh C-G. Metoprolol. In Goldberg (Ed.) Pharmacological and biochemical properties of drug substances, Vol. 2, pp. 186–227, American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington DC, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JL, Lutz JR, Gilbert EM, Sorensen SG, Yanowitz FG, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose beta-blockade therapy for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. American Journal of Cardiology 55: 471–475, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JL, Rodier HE, Green LS. Comparative effects of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs on experimental ventricular fibrillation threshold. American Journal of Cardiology 51: 1196–1202, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson O, Berglund G, Descamps R, Thomis J. Sotalol and metoprolol comparison of their anti-hypertensive effect. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21: 87–92, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnman K, Rydén L. Comparison of metoprolol and verapamil in the treatment of angina pectoris. American Journal of Cardiology 49: 821–827, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asplund J. A fixed-ratio combination of metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide (Co-Betaloc®) in essential hypertension: a comparison between the individual drugs. Current Therapeutic Research 29: 387–394, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Assaykeen TA, Michell G. Metoprolol in hypertension. An open evaluation. Medical Journal of Australia 1: 73–77, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baird MG, Bentley-Taylor MM, Carruthers SG, Dawson KG, Laplante LE, et al. (Betaloc Compliance Canadian Cooperative Study Group). A study of efficacy, tolerance and compliance of once-daily versus twice-daily metoprolol (Betaloc) in hypertension. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 7: 95–102, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bax NDS, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Woods HF, Porter NR, et al. The effect of β-adrenoceptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin after a single dose. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17: 553–557, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell FP. Effects of antihypertensive agents propranolol, metoprolol, nadolol, prazosin, and chlorthalidone on ACAT activity in rabbit and rat aortas and on LCAT activity in human plasma in vitro. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 7: 437–442, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson C. Seven years on a selective β-blocker — metoprolol. A long-term study of women with arterial hypertension. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 7–15, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet PN, John VA, Kendall MJ. (Eds). Oros drug delivery systems for the β-adrenoceptor antagonists: oxprenolol and metoprolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19(Suppl. 2): 63S–250S, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett PN, John VA, Whitmarsh VB. Effect of rifampicin on metoprolol and antipyrine kinetics. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 13: 387–391, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh JHAM, van Herwaarden CLA. Ventilatory effects of ordinary and slow-release tablets of metoprolol in asthmatic patients. European Journal of Respiratory Diseases 62: 168–172, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer W. The effect of β-adrenoceptor blocking agents on evolving myocardial necrosis in coronary ligated rats with and without reperfusion. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 328: 288–294, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bielmann P, Leduc G, Jéquier J-C, Davignon J, Cartwright K. Changes in the lipoprotein composition after chronic administration of metoprolol and propranolol in hypertriglyceridemic-hypertensive subjects. Current Therapeutic Research 30: 956–967, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloem ThJJ, Lindner PCJM. Metoprolol in angina pectoris complicated by essential hypertension. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 61–67, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boogaerts MA, Roelant C, Temmerman J, Goossens W, Verwilghen RL. Effect of beta-blocking drugs on red cell adhesive and rheological properties. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 102: 899–908, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle DMcC, Salathia KS. Very early intervention with metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Drugs 23(Suppl. 1): 6, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS. Metoprolol: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris. Drugs 14: 321–348, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgersdijk C, Van Der Meer FJM, Van Der Vijver JCM. Effects of metoprolol on digitalis-resistant atrial tachyarrhythmias in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Netherlands Journal of Medicine 27: 283–286, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bützow GH, Remmecke J, Bräuer A. Metoprolol in portal hypertension. A controlled study. Klinische Wochenschrift 60: 1311–1314, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callans A, Colling I, Dafgård T, Elander I, Jäderberg E, et al. The treatment of essential hypertension. Comparison of efficacy and tolerance of combined therapy with metoprolol (Seloken) plus spironolactone (Aldactone) and metoprolol plus bendroflumethiazide with potassium chloride. Clinical Trials Journal 18: 301–312, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert RT, Silke B, Taylor SH. A dose regimen for metoprolol in the treatment of myocardial infarction. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 34 (Dec. Suppl.): 32P, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Camm AJ, Ward DE, Whitmarsh VB. The acute electrophysiological effects of intravenous metoprolol. Clinical Cardiology 5: 327–331, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WB, Johnson AR, Callahan KS, Graham RM. Antiplatelet activity of beta-adrenergic antagonists: inhibition of the thromboxane synthesis and platelet aggregation in patients receiving long-term propranolol treatment. Lancet 2: 1382–1384, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffman M, Brogden RN. Diltiazem: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 29: 387–454, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clague HW, Ahmad D, Carruthers SG. Influence of cardioselectivity and respiratory disease on pulmonary responsiveness to beta-blockade. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 27: 517–523, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DWJ. Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications. Drugs 29: 342–375, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collste P, Haglund K, von Bahr C. Plasma levels and effects of metoprolol after single and multiple oral doses. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 27: 441–449, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo G, Fea F, Grieco A, Planca E, Salvioli G. Long-term treatment of hypertension. Effects of chlorthalidone (Igioton) and metoprolol (Lopressor). Clinical Trials Journal 19: 9–15, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Comerford MB, Besterman EMM. A clinical evaluation of sustained release metoprolol durules in the treatment of angina pectoris. Clinical Cardiology 5: 131–135, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KA. Comparison of the inotropic and chronotropic effects of metoprolol and propranolol. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21: 213–218, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KA, Byers JM, Finley PR, Burnham L. Lidocaine elimination: effects of metoprolol and of propranolol. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 33: 133–138, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corea L, Bentivoglio M, Verdecchia P, Provvidenza M, Motolese M. Left ventricular hypertrophy regression in hypertensive patients treated with metoprolol. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 22: 365–370, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corea L, Valori C, Bentivoglio M, Verdecchia P, Bichisao E. Age and responses to isometric exercise in hypertension: possible predictors of the antihypertensive effect of diuretics and β-blockers. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 23: 554–559, 1985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corrall RJM, Frier BM, Davidson NMcD, French EB. Hormonal and substrate responses during recovery from hypoglycaemia in man during beta1-selective and non-selective beta-adrenergic blockade. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 11: 279–283, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Currie PJ, Kelly MJ, McKenzie A, Harper RW, Lim YL, et al. Oral beta-adrenergic blockade with metoprolol in chronic severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 3: 203–209, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortellaro M, Boschetti C, Antoniazzi V, Polli EE. A pharmacokinetic and platelet function study of the combined administration of metoprolol and sulfinpyrazone to healthy volunteers. Thrombosis Research 34: 65–74, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cove-Smith JR, Kirk CA. CNS-related side-effects with metoprolol and atenolol. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 28 (Suppl.): 69–72, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe PF, Ferguson RJ. Comparison of the duration of antihypertensive action of atenolol and metoprolol over a 24-hour period. Current Medical Research and Opinion 9: 431–435, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dafgård T, Forsén B, Lindahl T. Comparative study of hydrochlorothiazide and a fixed combination of metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 37–44, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson M, Kjellberg J, Kuylenstierna J, Lundkvist L, Svensson O. Influence of time and physical activity on blood pressure and heart rate during treatment with β-blocking agents once daily. Acta Medica Scandinavica 214: 381–385, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day JL, Metcalfe J, Simpson CN. Adrenergic mechanisms in control of plasma lipid concentrations. British Medical Journal 284: 1145–1148, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dessi-Fulgheri P, Glorioso N, Madeddu P, Oppes M, Manca G, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of slow-release metoprolol and chlorthalidone as fixed combination: a randomised double blind comparison with chlorthalidone. Current Therapeutic Research 34: 515–522, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorow P, Weiss Th, Felix R, Schmutzler H. The influence of propranolol, metoprolol, and mepindole on mucocilary clearance in coronary heart disease patients without pulmonary disease. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 22: 108–111, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson N, Hirsch I, Olsson SB. Acute effects of lignocaine, procainamide, metoprolol, digoxin and atropine on human myocardial refractoriness. Cardiovascular Research 18: 463–470, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson N, Olsson SB. Effects of acute and chronic beta-receptor blockade on ventricular repolarisation in man. British Heart Journal 45: 628–636, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertson R, Hansson L. Effects of treatment with nifedipine and metoprolol in essential hypertension. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21: 389–390, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund L-G, Ekelund C, Rössner S. Antihypertensive effects at rest and during exercise of a calcium blocker, nifedipine, alone and in combination with metoprolol. Acta Medica Scandinavica 212: 71–75, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmeier RS, O’Connell JB, Walsh R, Rad N, Scanlon PJ, et al. Improvement in symptoms and exercise tolerance by metoprolol in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 72: 536–546, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • England JDF, Simons LA, Gibson JC, Carlton M. The effect of metoprolol and atenolol on plasma high density lipoprotein levels in man. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 7: 329–333, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erikssen J, Thaulow E, Mundal R, Opstad P, Nitter-Hauge S. Comparison of β-adrenoceptor blockers under maximal exercise (pindolol v metoprolol v atenolol). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 13(Suppl. 2): 201S–209S, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Essen Rv, Merx W, Neis W, Ritz R. Wirkung von Metoprolol auf die Infarktgröβe bein akuten Myokardinfarkt. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 107: 1267–1273, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Fager G, Berglund G, Bondjers G, Elmfeldt D, Lager I, et al. Effects of anti-hypertensive therapy on serum lipoproteins treatment with metoprolol, propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide. Artery 11: 283–296, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feleke E, Lyngstam O, Råstam L, Rydén L. Complaints of cold extremities among patients on antihypertensive treatment. Acta Medica Scandinavica 213: 381–385, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster PE, Hasan FM, Abraham T, Woolfenden J. Effect of metoprolol on cardiac and pulmonary function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical Cardiology 5: 125–129, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster PE, Quan SF, Hanson CD, Coaker LA. Suppression of ventricular ectopy with intravenous metoprolol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Critical Care Medicine 12: 29–32, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlito S, Damante G, Del Campo F, Di Vincenzo S, La Vignera A, et al. The effect of metoprolol on the glucose, insulin and glucagon response to glucose oral load in normal and diabetic subjects. Panminerva Medica 25: 93–97, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher GF. Exercise training during chronic beta blockade in cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Cardiology 55: 110D–113D, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floras JS, Jones JV, Hassan MO, Sleight P. Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol, metoprolol, pindolol, and slow-release propranolol. British Medical Journal 285: 1387–1392, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floris B, Franchetta G, Palestini N, Pignotti M, Sonaglioni G, et al. Slow-release metoprolol (Lopressor Retard®): once-daily cardioprotection for coronary heart disease. Current Therapeutic Research 31: 999–1006, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Floris B, Franchetta G, Palestini N, Sonaglioni G, Verdecchia P, et al. A fixed combination of metoprolol slow-release and chlorthalidone, given once daily, in the long-term treatment of arterial hypertension. Journal of International Medical Research 10: 82–86, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JE, Sigurdson MJ, Conliffe TF, Fand RS, Anthonisen NR. Effects of cardioselective and nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonists on pulmonary mechanisms. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 32: 149–155, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad FM, Tarazi RC, Bravo EL. Relation of cardiovascular response to the hypotensive effect of metoprolol. American Heart Journal 104: 803–811, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler MB, Bristow MR, Laser JA, Ginsburg R, Scott LB, et al. Beta-blocker therapy in severe heart failure: improvement related to beta1-adrenergic receptor up regulation. Circulation 70(Suppl. II): 112, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz I-W, Lohmann FW, Koch G. Excessive plasma dopamine increase at rest and during exercise after long-term beta-adrenoceptor blockade in hypertensive patients. British Heart Journal 44: 25–29, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franz I-W, Wiewel D, Ketelhut R. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients during a long-term treatment with a β-receptor blocker. Journal of Hypertension 3: 402, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone S, Silas JH, Lennard MS, Ramsay LE. Comparison of two long-acting preparations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in healthy men during chronic dosing. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 14: 713–718, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frishman WH, Michelson EL, Johnson BF, Poland MP. Multi-clinic comparison of labetalol to metoprolol in treatment of mild to moderate systemic hypertension. American Journal of Medicine 75: 54–67, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gangji D, Juvent M, Niset G, Wathieu M, Degreve M, et al. Study of the influence of nifedipine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17(Suppl. 1): 295–355, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleichmann U, Fassbender D, Trieb G, Mannebach H, Ohlmeier H. The influence of β-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on local wall motion abnormalities in patients with coronary heart disease. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 13(Suppl. 2): 301S–304S, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gmeiner R, Ng CK. Metoprolol in the treatment and prophylaxis of paroxysmal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 4: 5–13, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godbillon J, Evard D, Vidon N, Duval M, Schoeller JP, et al. Investigation of drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract of man. III. Metoprolol in the colon. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19(Suppl. 2): 113S–118S, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godbillon J, Gerardin A, John A, Theobald W. Comparative pharmacokinetic profiles of metoprolol and chlorthalidone administered alone or in combination to healthy volunteers. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 655–660, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow RM, Westberg B. The treatment of high blood pressure in the elderly: a multi-centre evaluation of a fixed combination of metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide (Co-Betaloc) in general practice. Current Medical Research and Opinion 7: 536–542, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govind U, Munro BFR, Robertson LI. A fixed combination of metoprolol and chlorthalidone in hypertension. South African Medical Journal 60: 921–924, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RM, Campbell WB, Jackson EK. Effects of short-term beta blockade on blood pressure, plasma thromboxane B2, and plasma urinary prostaglandins E2 and F in normal subjects. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31: 324–329, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greefhorst APM, van Herwaarden CLA. Comparative study of the ventilatory effects of three beta1-selective blocking agents in asthmatic patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 417–421, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greefhorst APM, van Herwaarden CLA. Ventilatory and haemodynamic effects of terbutaline infusion during beta1-selective blockade with metoprolol and acebutolol in asthmatic patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 23: 203–208, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greer IA, Walker JJ, McLaren M, Calder AA, Forbes CD. A comparative study of the effects of adrenoceptor antagonists on platelet aggregation and thromboxane generation. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 54: 480–484, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groop L, Totterman K-J, Harno K, Gordin A. Influence of beta-blocking drugs on glucose metabolism in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Acta Medica Scandinavica 211: 7–12, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groop L, Totterman KJ, Harno K, Gordin A. Influence of beta-blocking drugs on glucose metabolism in hypertensive, non-diabetic patients. Acta Medica Scandinavica 213: 9–14, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gugler R, Krist R, Raczinski H, Höffgen K, Bodem G. Comparative pharmacodynamics and plasma levels of β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 10: 337–343, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund K, Collste P. Time course of blood pressure, pulse rate, plasma renin and metoprolol during treatment of hypertensive patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17: 321–328, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallengren B, Nilsson OR, Karlberg BE, Melander A, Tegler L, et al. Influence of hyperthyroidism on the kinetics of methimazole, propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21: 379–384, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammershøy O. A Nordic multicentre dose-response study of metoprolol in angina pectoris patients. Current Therapeutic Research 31: 1026–1034, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton JR. Beta-blockers in the prevention of myocardial infarction. Practitioner 228: 55–63, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna MH, Heap DG, Kimberley APS. Cardiac dysrhythmia associated with general anaesthesia for oral surgery. Anaesthesia 38: 1192–1194, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson B-G, Dymling J-F, Manhem P, Hökfelt B. Effects of penbutolol and metoprolol on blood pressure, plasma catecholamines and renin activity in hypertensive patients. European Heart Journal 4(Suppl. D): 57–60, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heel RC, Avery GS. Appendix A: drug data information. In Avery (Ed.) Drug Treatment, 2nd ed., p. 1212, ADIS Press, Sydney & New York, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS. Atenolol: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in angina pectoris and hypertension. Drugs 17: 425–460, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS. Penbutolol: a preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris. Drugs 22: 1–25, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä H, Jalonen J, Laaksonen V, Arola M, Oja R. Metoprolol medication and coronary artery bypass grafting operation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 28: 677–682, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry WG, Silke B, Taylor SH. Haemodynamic dose-response effects of i.v. metoprolol in coronary heart disease. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19: 323–327, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepner SI, Davoli E. Successful treatment of supraventricular tachycardia with metoprolol, a cardioselective beta-blocker. Clinical Pediatrics 22: 522–523, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Ejdebäck J, Swedberg K, Waagstein F, Hjalmarson Å. Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: electrocardiographically estimated infarct size. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 22D–26D, 1984a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Elmfeldt D, Hjalmarson Å, Holmberg S, Málek I, et al. Effect of metoprolol on indirect signs of the size and severity of acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology 51: 1282–1288, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Elmfeldt D, Holmberg S, Málek I, Nyberg G, et al. Goteborg Metoprolol Trial: mortality and causes of death. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 9D–14D, 1984b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Emanuelsson H, Swedberg K, Vedin A, Waldenström A, et al. Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: enzyme-estimated infarct size. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 15D–21D, 1984c

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Hartford M, Pennert K, Waagstein F, Waldenström A, et al. Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: clinical observations. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 37D–45D, 1984d

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Hjalmarson Å, Holmberg S, Pennert K, Swedberg K, et al. Effect of metoprolol on chest pain in acute myocardial infarction. British Heart Journal 51: 438–444, 1984e

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Hjalmarson Å, Holmberg S, Pennert K, Swedberg K, et al. Tolerability to treatment with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction in relation to age. Acta Medica Scandinavica 217: 293–298, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Hjalmarson Å, Holmberg S, Swedberg K, Vedin A, et al. Development of congestive heart failure after treatment with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. British Heart Journal 51: 539–544, 1984f

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Hjalmarson Å, Swedberg K, Waagstein F, Holmberg S, et al. Relationship between infarct size and incidence of severe ventricular arrhythmias in a double-blind trial with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. International Journal of Cardiology 6: 47–60, 1984g

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Holmberg S, Pennert K, Swedberg K, Vedin A, et al. Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: design, patient characteristics and conduct. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 3D–8D, 1984h

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz J, Pennert K, Wedel H, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C, et al. Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: tolerance. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 46D–50D, 1984i

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt WR, Fradl DC, Zerbe GO, Byyny RL, Nies AS. Selective and nonselective β-blockade of the peripheral circulation. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 35: 12–18, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtz J. The gastrointestinal absorption of drugs in man: a review of current concepts and methods of investigation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19(Suppl. 2): 77S–83S, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarson Å. Acute intervention with metoprolol in myocardial infarction. Acta Medica Scandinavica (Suppl.) 651: 177–184, 1981

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarson Å. Early intervention with a beta-blocking drug after acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology 54: 11E–13E, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarson Å, Herlitz J, Holmberg S, Rydén L, Swedberg K, et al. The Göteborg Metoprolol Trial. Circulation 67(Suppl. I): 126–132, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarson Å, Herlitz J, Málek I, Rydén L, Vedin A, et al. Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 823–827, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann K-J, Regårdh C-G, Aurell M, Ervik M, Jordö L. The effect of impaired renal function on the plasma concentration and urinary excretion of metoprolol metabolites. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5: 181–191, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Högstedt S, Lindberg B, Peng DR, Regårdh C-G, Rane A. Pregnancy-induced increase in metoprolol metabolism. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 37: 688–692, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Högstedt S, Lindberg B, Rane A. Increased oral clearance of metoprolol in pregnancy. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 217–220, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman E, Rosenthal T, Goldbourt U, Segal P. Different effects of metoprolol and chlorthalidone on serum lipoprotein levels in mild hypertension. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 20: 1169–1176, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houben H, Thien Th, Wijnands G, Van’t Laar A. Effects of cold exposure on blood pressure, heart rate and forearm blood flow in normotensives during selective and non-selective β-adrenoceptor blockade. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 14: 867–870, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houtzagers JJR. An evaluation of the effect and effective duration of metoprolol administered once daily in the treatment of angina pectoris. Clinical Therapeutics 2: 287–295, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtzagers JJR, Dols DM, Meems L. Slow-release metoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide and hydralazine in stepwise treatment of essential hypertension. Netherlands Journal of Medicine 27: 287–292, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houtzagers JJR, Streurman O, Regårdh C-G. The effect of pretreatment with cimetidine on the bioavailability and disposition of atenolol and metoprolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 14: 67–72, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howe A. Comparative trial of metoprolol Durules (once daily) and metoprolol tablets (twice daily). Practitioner 226: 573–575, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua ASP, Assaykeen TA, Nyberg G, Kincaid-Smith PS. Results from a multicentre trial of metoprolol and a study of hypertensive patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Medical Journal of Australia 1: 281–286, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Collaborative Study Group. Reduction of infarct size with the early use of timolol in acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 310: 9–15, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • ISIS Group. Vascular mortality after early IV beta-blockade in myocardial infarction. Circulation 72(Suppl. III): 224, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäättelä A, Mäki O. Comparison of long-acting propranolol and conventional metoprolol in the treatment of hypertension. Annals of Clinical Research 15: 45–49, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jack DB. Statistical analysis of polymorphic drug metabolism data using the Rosin Rammler Sperling Weibull distribution. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 25: 443–448, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jack DB, Kendall MJ, Dean S, Laugher SJ, Zaman R. The effect of hydralazine on the pharmacokinetics of three different beta adrenoceptor antagonists: metoprolol, nadolol and acebutolol. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition 3: 47–54, 1982a

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jack DB, Quarterman CP, Zaman R, Kendall MJ. Variability of beta-blocker pharmacokinetics in young volunteers. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 23: 37–42, 1982b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jack DB, Wilkins M, Quarterman CP. Lack of evidence for polymorphism in metoprolol metabolism. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 16: 188–190, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings G, Bobik A, Korner P. Influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of β-adrenoceptor blockers on the heart rate and blood pressure responses to graded exercise. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 12: 355–362, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobin G, Cortot A, Godbillon J, Duval M, Schoeller JP, et al. Investigation of drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract of man. I. Metoprolol in the stomach, duodenum and jejunum. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19(Suppl. 2): 97S–105S, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BF. The emerging problem of plasma lipid changes during antihypertensive therapy. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 4(Suppl. 2): S213–S221, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson G, Jordö L, Lundborg P, Regårdh C-G, Rönn O. Plasma-levels and pharmacological effects of metoprolol administered as controlled release (Durules) and ordinary tablets in healthy volunteers. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 18: 292–297, 1980

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordö L, Attman PO, Aurell M, Johansson L, Johnsson G, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of metoprolol in patients with impaired renal function. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5: 169–180, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordo L, Johnsson G, Lundborg P, Regårdh C-G. Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in healthy individuals pretreated with multiple doses of metoprolol. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 22: 312–315, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karachalios GN. A comparative study of metoprolol and methyldopa in the treatment of hypertension. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 21: 476–478, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JG, Salem SAM, Kinney CD, Shanks RG, McDevitt DG. Effects of ranitidine on the disposition of metoprolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19: 219–224, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MJ, Jack DB, Laugher SJ, Lobo J, Smith SR. Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between nifedipine and the β-adrenoceptor blockers metoprolol and atenolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 18: 331–335, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MJ, John VA, Quarterman CP, Welling PG. A single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and slow-release metoprolol. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17: 87–92, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MJ, Quarterman CP, Jack DB, Beeley L. Metoprolol pharmacokinetics and the oral contraceptive pill. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 14: 120–122, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keyriläinen O, Bae E, Rytkönen U, Mathieson MS, Wendelin H. Metoprolol, nifedipine and the combination in effort angina pectoris. I. Clinical effects. (Abstract No. 1464). European Heart Journal 5(Suppl. 1): 293, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann W, Schnabel A, Schmitt WM, Biro G, Hippchen M. Catecholamine, STH, Cortisol, Glucagon, Insulin and Sexualhormone bei körperlicher Belastung und Beta1-Blockade. Klinische Wochenschrift 60: 505–512, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch W, Rämsch K, Janisch HD, Ohnhaus EE. The influence of two histamine H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, on the plasma levels and clinical effect of nifedipine and metoprolol. Archives of Toxicology (Suppl. 7): 256–259, 1984a

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch W, Spahn H, Hutt HJ, Ohnhaus EE, Mutschler E. Interaction between alcohol and metoprolol or atenolol in social drinking. Drugs 25: 152, 1983a

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch W, Spahn H, Kitteringham NR, Hutt HJ, Mutschler E, et al. Interaction between the β-adrenoceptor blockers metoprolol and atenolol with amitriptyline and their effects on oxidative liver metabolism. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17(Suppl. 1): 65S–68S, 1984b

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch W, Spahn H, Köhler H, Ohnhaus EE, Mutschler E. Interaction of metoprolol, propranolol and atenolol with concurrent administration of cimetidine. Klinische Wochenschrift 60: 1401–1407, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch W, Spahn H, Ohnhaus EE, Köhler H, Heinz U, et al. Influence of inflammatory disease on the clinical pharmacokinetics of atenolol and metoprolol. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition 4: 73–81, 1983b

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kølendorf K, Bonnevie-Nielsen V, Broch-Møller B. A trial of metoprolol in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Acta Medica Scandinavica 211: 175–178, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik MM, Coote JH. Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of indapamide and metoprolol. Postgraduate Medical Journal 57(Suppl. 2): 44–50, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik MM, Coote JH. Propranolol vs metoprolol vs labetalol: a comparative study in essential hypertension. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 26: 1–6, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulas J, Lunell N-O, Rosing U, Stéen B, Rane A. Atenolol and metoprolol. A comparison of their excretion into human breast milk. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica (Suppl. 118): 65–69, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Lameyer LDF, Hesse CJ. Metoprolol in high renin hypertension. A comparison with propranolol. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 16–22, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lange R, Nieminen MS, Kloner RA. Failure of pindolol and metoprolol to reduce the size of non-reperfused infarcts in dogs using area at risk techniques. Cardiovascular Research 18: 37–43, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M, Landahl S, Lundberg P, Regårdh C-G. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol in healthy, elderly, non-smoking individuals after a single dose and two weeks of treatment. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 27: 217–222, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenius B, Hansson L. A double-blind comparison of spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients treated with metoprolol. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 20: 291–295, 1982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DS, Sabay JN, Chatterjee SS, Cruickshank JM. β-Blockers in asthma. Drugs 25(Suppl. 2): 232–236, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrec D, Nouel O, Corbic M, Benhamou J-P. Propranolol — a medical treatment for portal hypertension. Lancet 2: 180–182, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrec D, Poynard T, Hillon P, Benhamou J-P. Propranolol for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. New England Journal of Medicine 305: 1371–1374, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann H, Bippi H, Boekens H, Frölich JC, Herrmann H. Variability in the pharmacokinetics of atenolol and metoprolol. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 848–851, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch AG, Hopkin JM, Ellis DA, Clarkson DMcG, Merchant S, et al. Failure of propranolol and metoprolol to alter ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide and exercise. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 9: 493–498, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lennard MS, Silas JH, Freestone S, Ramsay LE, Tucker GT, et al. Oxidation phenotype — a major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response. New England Journal of Medicine 307: 1558–1560, 1982a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lennard MS, Silas JH, Freestone S, Trevethick J. Defective metabolism of metoprolol in poor hydroxylators of debrisoquine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 14: 301–303, 1982b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Silas JH, Freestone S, Ramsay LE, et al. Differential stereoselective metabolism of metoprolol in extensive and poor debrisoquine metabolizers. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 34: 732–737, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liedholm H, Melander A, Bitzén P-O, Helm G, Lönnerholm G, et al. Accumulation of atenolol and metoprolol in human breast milk. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 229–231, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liedholm H, Ursing D. Antihypertensive effect and tolerability of two fixed combinations of metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide followed by a long-term tolerance study with one combination. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 45–53, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd EA, Gordon GD, Mabin TA, et al. Intravenous sotalol in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 3(Suppl. 2): 983, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfdahl C-G, Svedmyr N. Cardioselectivity of atenolol and metoprolol. A study in asthmatic patients. European Journal of Respiratory Diseases 62: 396–404, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan RL, Goldstraw PW, Kiddle GB, Flacks LM, Watt M. Sustained release metoprolol: a comparison with conventional formulation in the treatment of hypertension. New Zealand Medical Journal 94: 1–2, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo M, Nicotra V, Oppizz G, Selvini A. The treatment of unstable angina with metoprolol; an investigation up to 7 months. Ospedale Maggiore 75: 22–28, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchelli PD, Ronuchi E, Palumbo G, Pollavini G, Modignani RL, et al. A comparative study of slow-release metoprolol and atenolol in the management of arterial hypertension. Acta Therapeutica 10: 191–200, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Johansen P. Central haemodynamic effects of beta blockers in hypertension. A comparison between atenolol, metoprolol, timolol, penbutolol, alprenolol, pindolol and bunitrolol. European Heart Journal 4(Suppl. D): 1–12, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyngstam O, Rydén L. Metoprolol and atenolol administered once daily in primary hypertension. Acta Medica Scandinavica 209: 261–266, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon SW, MacDonald GJ, Bernstein L, Andrews G, Blacket RB. Comparison of weight reduction with metoprolol in the treatment of hypertension in young overweight patients. Lancet 1: 1233–1236, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manger Cats V, van Capelle FJL, Lie KI, Durrer D. Effect of treatment with 2 x l00mg metoprolol on mortality in a single-center study with low placebo mortality-rate after infarction. Circulation 68: III–181, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin’t Veld AJ, Schalekamp MADH. Haemodynamic consequences of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and cardioselectivity in beta-blocker therapy for hypertension. European Heart Journal 4(Suppl. D): 31–41, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantero F, Procidano M, Vicariotto MA, Girolami A. Effect of atenolol and metoprolol on the anticoagulant activity of acenocoumarin. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17(Suppl. 1): 94S–96S, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mänttäri M, Eisalo A. A comparison of two cardioselective beta-blockers with different ancillary properties in the treatment of hypertension. Acta Medica Scandinavica 668 (Suppl.): 114–117, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Browning RC. Metoprolol in the aged hypertensive: a comparison of two dosage schedules. Postgraduate Medical Journal 61: 225–227, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt DG. Clinical significance of cardioselectivity. State-of-the-art. Drugs 25(Suppl. 2): 219–226, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • McGourty JC, Silas JH, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Metoprolol metabolism and debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism — population and family studies. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 555–566, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messerli FH, Ventura HO. Cardiovascular pathophysiology of essential hypertension: a clue to therapy. Drugs 30(Suppl. 1): 25–34, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metoprolol Surveillance Study Group. A long-term surveillance study of metoprolol in hypertensive patients. Current Therapeutic Research 35: 491–500, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • MIAMI Trial Research Group. Metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction (MIAMI). A randomised placebo-controlled international trial. European Heart Journal 6: 199–226, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Micossi P, Pollavini G, Raggi U, Fibrenti MC, Garimberti B, et al. Effects of metoprolol and propranolol on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in diabetes mellitus. Hormone and Metabolic Research 16: 59–63, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NE. Coronary atherosclerosis and plasma lipoproteins: epidemiology and pathophysiologic considerations. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 4(Suppl. 2): 5190–5195, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Miners JO, Wing LMH, Lillywhite KJ, Smith KJ. Failure of‘therapeutic’ doses of β-adrenoceptor antagonists to alter the disposition of tolbutamide and lignocaine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 18: 853–860, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrović V, Neuss H, Buss J, Warmann I, Horn HG. Reduction of heart rate with a beta-receptor blocking agent in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Herz Kreislauf 13: 493–497, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley CA, Cavalcanti C, Perrins EJ, Sutton R. A comparison of once daily atenolol and metoprolol SA in mild to moderate hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 15: 715–717, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DP, Murray RG, Littler WA. The effects of metoprolol given early in actue myocardial infarction on ventricular arrhythmias. European Heart Journal, in press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers MG, Thiessen JJ. Metoprolol kinetics and dose response in hypertensive patients. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 27: 756–762, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neil-Dwyer G, Bartlett J, McAinsh J, Cruickshank JM. β-adrenoceptor blockers and the blood-brain barrier. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 11: 549–553, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson GIC, Donnelly GL, Hunyor SN. Haemodynamic effects of sustained treatment with prazosin and metoprolol, alone and in combination, in borderline hypertensive heart failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 4: 240–245, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nievel JG, Havard CWH. A double-blind crossover comparative study of the efficacy of single daily doses of conventional and slow release metoprolol. Current Medical Research and Opinion 7: 503–515, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson OR, Atterhög J-H, Castenfors J, Jonfelt L, Karlberg BE, et al. A comparison of l00mg atenolol and l00mg metoprolol once a day at rest and during exercise in hypertensives. Acta Medica Scandinavica 216: 301–307, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson OR, Kågedal B, Tegler L. Insulin release and carbohydrate tolerance in hyperthyroid patients during non-selective or selective β-1-adrenoceptor blockade. Acta Endocrinologica 93: 179–185, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RM. β-Adrenoceptor blockers. An update on their role in acute myocardial infarction. Drugs 29: 97–104, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RM, Barnaby PF, Brandt PWT, Geary GG, Whitchlock RML, et al. Prognosis after recovery from first acute myocardial infarction: determinants of reinfarction and sudden death. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 408–413, 1984a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RM, Barnaby PF, Brown MA, Geary GG, Clarke ED, et al. Prevention of ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction by intravenous propranolol. Lancet 2: 883–886, 1984b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RM, Sammel NL, Clarke ED, Brandt PWT. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction with propranolol. British Heart Journal 43: 617–622, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor DT, Mosley CA, Cervenka J, Bernstein KN. Contrasting renal haemodynamic responses to the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and the beta-adrenergic antagonist metoprolol in essential hypertension. Journal of Hypertension 2(Suppl. 2): 89–92, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson RW, Beil ME, Coran WM, Wong A, Weiss GB. Synergistic effects of metoprolol on ventricular fibrillation threshold during concomitant lidocaine infusion. Federation Proceedings 44: 899, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G, Hjemdahl P, Rehnqvist N. Rebound phenomena following gradual withdrawal of chronic metoprolol treatment in patients with ischemic heart disease. American Heart Journal 108: 454–462, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G, Rehnqvist N. Ventricular arrhythmias during the first year after an acute myocardial infarction. Influence of chronic metoprolol treatment. Circulation 69: 1129–1134, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G, Rehnqvist N. Reduction of nonfatal reinfarctions in patients with a history of hypertension by chronic postinfarction treatment with metoprolol. Acta Medica Scandinavica, in press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G, Rehnqvist N, Lundman T, Melcher A. Metoprolol treatment after acute myocardial infarction. Effects on ventricular arrhythmias and exercise tests during 6 months. Acta Medica Scandinavica 210: 59–65, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G, Rehnqvist N, Sjögren A, Erhardt L, Lundman T. Long-term treatment with metoprolol after myocardial infarction: effect on 3 year mortality and morbidity. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 5: 1428–1437, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orö L. Treatment of angina pectoris with metoprolol. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 58–60, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Packer M, Meller J, Medina N, Yushak M, Smith H, et al. Hemodynamic consequences of combined beta-adrenergic and slow calcium channel blockade in man. Circulation 65: 660–668, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G, Daneshmend TK, Roberts CJC. Do beta blockers differ in their effects on hepatic microsomal enzymes and liver blood flow? Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 493–499, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parving H-H, Andersen AR, Smidt UM, Svendsen PAA. Early aggressive antihypertensive treatment reduces rate of decline in kidney function in diabetic nephropathy. Lancet 1: 1175–1178, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasotti C, Capra A, Fiorella G, Vibelli C, Chierichetti SM. Effects of pindolol and metoprolol on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 13(Suppl. 2): 435S–439S, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penman WA, Smith RG. Pilot study of antihypertensive treatment in the elderly. Practitioner 226: 1180–1182, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peter T, Norris RM, Clarke ED, Henry MK, Singh BN, et al. Reduction of enzyme levels by propranolol after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 57: 1091–1095, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pontén J, Häggendal J, Milocco I, Waldenström A. Long-term metoprolol therapy and neuroleptanesthesia in coronary artery surgery: withdrawal versus maintenance of β1adrenoreceptor blockade. Anesthesia and Analgesia 62: 380–390, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popp DA, Tse TF, Shah SD, Clutter WE, Cryer PE. Oral propranolol and metoprolol both impair glucose recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 7: 243–247, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt CM, Yepsen SC, Bloom MGK, Taylor AA, Young JB, et al. Evaluation of metoprolol in suppressing complex ventricular arrhythmias. American Journal of Cardiology 52: 73–78, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard BNC. Mechanisms of myocardial infarct prevention with β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. Drugs 25(Suppl. 2): 295–302, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun KK, Yeung CK, Yeung RTT. Effects of propranolol and metoprolol on glucose, cyclic AMP and insulin responses during pharmacologic hyperglucagonemia in hemodialysis patients. Nephron 39: 175–178, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quan SF, Fenster PE, Hanson CD, Coaker LA, Basistu MP. Suppression of atrial ectopy with intravenous metoprolol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 23: 341–347, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quarterman CP, Kendall MJ, Jack DB. The effects of age on the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and its metabolites. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 11: 287–294, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raine AEG, Vaughan Williams EM. Adaptation to prolonged β-blockade of rabbit atrial, purkinje, and ventricular potentials, and of papillary muscle contraction. Circulation Research 48: 804–812, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rangno RE, Langlois S. Comparison of withdrawal phenomena after propranolol, metoprolol, and pindolol. American Heart Journal 104: 473–478, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rangno RE, Langlois S, Lutterodt A. Metoprolol withdrawal phenomena: mechanism and prevention. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31: 8–15, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regårdh C-G, Johnsson G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metoprolol. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5: 557–569, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regårdh C-G, Johnsson G. Interindividual variations in metoprolol metabolism — some clinical and other observations. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17: 495–496, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regårdh C-G, Johnsson G, Jordö L, Lundborg P, Persson B-A, et al. Plasma concentrations and beta-blocking effects in normal volunteers after intravenous doses of metoprolol and propranolol. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 2: 715–723, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regårdh C-G, Jordö L, Ervik M, Lundborg P, Olsson R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 6: 375–388, 1981a

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regårdh C-G, Landahl S, Larsson M, Lundborg P, Steen B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and its metabolite α-OH-metoprolol in healthy, non-smoking, elderly individuals. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 221–226, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regårdh C-G, Lundborg P, Persson BA. The effect of antacid, metoclopramide, and propantheline on the bioavailability of metoprolol and atenolol. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition 2: 79–87, 1981b

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehnqvist N. Clinical experience with intravenous metoprolol in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 68–72, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richterova A, Herlitz J, Holmberg S, Swedberg K, Waagstein F, et al. Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: effects on chest pain. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 32D–36D, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby JW, Scott AK, Hawksworth GM, Petrie JC. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol in elderly hypertensive and young healthy subjects. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 327–331, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolf Smith S, Gibson R, Bradley D, Kendall MJ. Failure of indomethacin to modify β-adrenoceptor blockade. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 15: 267–268, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollason WN, Kemp RJ, Wills LC. Hypotensive anaesthesia for operations on the ear, nose and parotid gland. Use of intravenous metoprolol as an adjunct to sodium nitroprusside and halothane. Anaesthesia 38: 590–594, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rollason WN, Russell JG. Intravenous metoprolol and cardiac dysrhythmias. Anaesthesia 35: 783–789, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi PC, Loni G. Treatment of essential arterial hypertension. Efficacy and tolerability of β-blocker metoprolol slow release (Lopressor Retard) and diuretic chlorthalidone (Igroton) alone or concurrently. Clinical Trials Journal 22: 248–256, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmensch HH, Vlasses PH, Ferguson RK. Prophylactic use of beta-adrenergic blockade in survivors of myocardial infarction. Heart and Lung 13: 366–371, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rydén L, Ariniego R, Arnman K, Herlitz J, Hjalmarson Å, et al. A double-blind trial of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 308: 614–618, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saarnivaara L, Lindgren L, Hynynen M. Effects of practolol and metoprolol on QT interval, heart rate and arterial pressure during induction of anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 28: 644–648, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sada H, Ban T. Effects of various structurally related beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents on maximum upstroke velocity of action potential in guinea-pig papillary muscles. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 317: 245–251, 1981a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sada H, Ban T. Frequency-dependent block of nerve conduction by β-adrenergic blocking agents. Archives Internationales de-Pharmacodynamie et de Therapie 254: 134–144, 1981b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salathia KS, Barber JM, McIlmoyle EL, Nicholas J, Evans AE, et al. Very early intervention with metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal 6: 190–198, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström B, Lindeberg S, Lundborg P, Regårdh C-G. Disposition of the adrenergic blocker metoprolol in the late pregnant women, the amniotic fluid, the cord blood and the neonate. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension’ Part B — Hypertension in Pregnancy B2: 75–82, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström B, Regårdh C-G. Metoprolol excretion into breast milk. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 9: 518–519, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider RE, Bishop H, Kendall MJ, Quarterman CP. Effect of inflammatory disease on plasma concentrations of three β-adrenoceptor blocking agents. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 19: 158–162, 1981

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler K-U, Schuster KJ, Meyer G-J, Niedermayer W, Wassermann O. The pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and its metabolites in dialysis patients. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5: 192–198, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silas JH, Freestone S, Lennard MS, Ramsay LE. Comparison of two slow-release formulations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 387–391, 1985a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silas JH, McGourty JC, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Polymorphic metabolism of metoprolol: clinical studies. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 28 (Suppl.): 85–88, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sill JC, Nugent M, Moyer TP, Schaff H, Tinker JH. Plasma levels of beta-blocking drugs prior to coronary artery bypass surgery. Anaesthesiology 62: 67–70, 1985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AN, Paul L, Tanaka S. A double-blind crossover trial of Lopressor SR vs Lopressor B.I.D. in essential hypertension. Current Therapeutic Research 33: 601–610, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg F-H. Metoprolol and propranolol in the treatment of essential hypertension — a long term comparative study. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 23–29, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar J, Johnston GD, Overlie P, Gerber JG, Brammell HL, et al. The effects of a cardioselective (metoprolol) and a nonselective (propranolol) beta-adrenergic blocker on the response to dynamic exercise in normal men. Circulation 65: 894–899, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sleight P. Myocardial infarction. Interventions during and after acute myocardial infarction. Postgraduate Medical Journal 59(Suppl. 3): 80–88, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman JG, Manolas E. Cardiovascular diseases. In Avery GS (Ed.) Drug Treatment, 2nd ed., pp. 554–637, ADIS Press, Auckland, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilde JG. Comparison of the antihypertensive effect of double dose of metoprolol versus the addition of hydrochlorothiazide to metoprolol. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 25: 581–583, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonkodi S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Fraser R, Leckie BJ, Morton JJ, et al. Response of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to upright tilting and to intravenous frusemide: effect of prior metoprolol and propranolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 13: 341–350, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbini CA, Grassi V, Tantucci C, Todisco T, Motolese M, et al. Acute effects of oral metoprolol on ventilatory function in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Acta Therapeutica 8: 5–16, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorbini CA, Grassi V, Tantucci C, Verdecchia P, Motolese M. Evaluation of metoprolol cardioselectivity: insensitivity of the bronchial response to exercise in healthy subjects. Current Therapeutic Research 35: 48–56, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin EM, Clissold SP, Brogden RN. Nifedipine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders. Drugs 30: 182–274, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spahn H, Kirch W, Mutsahler E, Ohnhaus EE, Kitteringham NR, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between phenprocoumon and atenolol or metoprolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17(Suppl. 1): 97S–102S, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spahn H, Mutschler E, Kirch W, Ohnhaus EE, Janisch HD. Influence of ranitidine on plasma metoprolol and atenolol concentrations. British Medical Journal 286: 1546–1547, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes GS, Mennie BA, Gellatly R, Hill A. On the combination of α- and β-adrenoceptor blockade in hypertension. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 34: 576–582, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strandgaard S, Elmgreen J, Christensen TE, Laursen SW. Effect of short-term and long-term treatment with metoprolol on renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate in hypertensive patients with a normal kidney function. Danish Medical Bulletin 29: 287–289, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson A, Gudbrandsson T, Sivertsson R, Hansson L. Mode of action of β-adrenoceptor blocking agents in hypertension. A comparison between metoprolol and pindolol with special reference to peripheral vascular effects. Acta Medica Scandinavica (Suppl. 665) 103–108, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg K, Hjalmarson Å, Waagstein F, Wallentin I. Prolongation of survival in congestive cardiomyopathy by beta-receptor blockade. Lancet 1: 1374–1376, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg K, Hjalmarson Å, Waagstein F, Wallentin I. Beneficial effects of long-term beta-blockade in congestive cardiomyopathy. British Heart Journal 44: 117–133, 1980a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg K, Hjalmarson Å, Waagstein F, Wallentin I. Adverse effects of beta-blockade withdrawal in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. British Heart Journal 44: 134–142, 1980b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Symposium on the Role of β-Blockade in Acute MI. Drugs 29(Suppl. 1): 2–8, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SH, Silke B, Lee PS. Intravenous β-blockade in coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine 306: 631–635, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tesch PA. β-Blockade and exercise performance. Sports Medicine 2: 389–412, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thadani U, Davidson C, Singleton W, Taylor SH. Comparison of five beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with different ancillary properties during sustained twice daily therapy in angina pectoris. American Journal of Medicine 68: 243–250, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trafford JAP, McGonigle R, Bowles J, O’Neal H, Bennet-Jones DN, et al. A two year clinical evaluation of atenolol and metoprolol in the treatment of hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Practice 36: 350–352, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimarco B, De Luca N, Ricciardelli B, Volpe M, Veniero A, et al. Diltiazem in the treatment of mild or moderate essential hypertension. Comparison with metoprolol in a crossover double-blind trial. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 218–227, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimarco B, Wikstrand J. Regression of cardiovascular structural changes by antihypertensive treatment. Hypertension 6(Suppl. III): 150–157, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A. Effects of metoprolol administered as conventional tablets and as slow-release tablets in the treatment of hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 3: 406–408, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A, Honkavaara M. Clinical evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of metoprolol in combination with hydrochlorothiazide and hydralazine in an unselected hypertensive population. Acta Cardiologica 35: 289–301, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner P. β-Blockers and the central nervous system. Drugs 25(Suppl. 2): 262–264, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Twum-Barina Y, Ahmad D, Hamilton JT, Carruthers SG. Ineffectiveness of beta-adrenergic blockers on ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 32: 289–294, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo A, Arstila M, Bae EA, Härkönen R, Keyriläinen O, et al. Metoprolol, nifedipine and the combination in stable effort angina pectoris. American Journal of Cardiology, in press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo AJ, Keyriläinen O. Slow-release metoprolol in angina pectoris. Annals of Clinical Research 11: 199–204, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo A, Keyriläinen O, Johnsson G. A dose-response study on metoprolol in angina pectoris. Annals of Clinical Research 13(Suppl. 30): 54–57, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Wall EE, Westera G, Visser FC, Eenige Van MJ, Den Hollander W, et al. Influence of metoprolol on myocardial uptake of free fatty acids in experimental myocardial ischemia. Current Therapeutic Research 32: 653–662, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhees L, Fagard R, Amery A. Influence of beta-adrenergic blockade on the hemodynamic effects of physical training in patients with ischemic heart disease. American Heart Journal 108: 270–275, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viberti GC, Keen H, Bloom SR. Beta blockade and diabetes mellitus: effect of oxprenolol and metoprolol on the metabolic, cardiovascular, and hormonal response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in normal subjects. Metabolism 29: 866–872, 1980a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viberti GC, Keen H, Bloom SR. Beta blockade and diabetes mellitus: effect of oxprenolol and metoprolol on the metabolic, cardiovascular, and hormonal response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetics. Metabolism 29: 873–879, 1980b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidon N, Evard D, Godbillon J, Rongier M, Duval M, et al. Investigation of drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract of man. II. Metoprolol in the jejunum and ileum. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 19(Suppl. 2): 107S–112S, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vik-Mo H, Maroko PR, Ribeiro GT. Comparative effects of propranolol, timolol and metoprolol on myocardial infarct size after experimental coronary artery occlusion. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 4: 735–741, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilén L, Kutti J, Freden K, Lundborg P, Cronberg S. The peripheral platelet count and ADP-induced platelet aggregation response to metoprolol and propranolol as studied in young healthy male volunteers. Scandinavian Journal of Haematology 31: 440–446, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilén L, Kutti J, Swedberg K, Vedin A. ADP-induced platelet aggregation and metoprolol treatment of myocardial infarction patients. Acta Medica Scandinavica 217: 15–20, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe M, Trimarco B, Ricciardelli B, Cuocolo A, Veniero AM, et al. Predictability of antihypertensive efficacy of selective β1blockers. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 34: 758–763, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waagstein F, Hjalmarson Å, Swedberg K, Wallentin I. Beta-blockade in dilated cardiomyopathies: they work. European Heart Journal 4(Suppl. A): 173–178, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waal-Manning HJ. Effects of some β-blockers on renal function in hypertension. New Zealand Medical Journal 96: 914–915, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahrenberg H, Arner P, Engfeldt P, Haglund K, Rössner S, et al. Long-term β1-selective adrenergic blockade and adrenergic receptors in human subcutaneous adipocytes. Acta Medica Scandinavica 217: 539–546, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Booth P, Rubin P, Macfarlane P, Hillis S. Metoprolol in the prevention of dysrhythmias during minor dental surgery. American Heart Journal 105: 689–691, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber KT, Likoff MJ, McCarthy D. Low-dose beta blockade in the treatment of chronic cardiac failure. American Heart Journal 104: 877–879, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J. Interactions of NSAIDs with diuretics and β-blockers. Mechanisms and clinical implications. Drugs 30: 32–41, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welter J, Fuchs H-J, Herden H-N. Kontrollierte Hypotension mit Metoprolol und Nitroprussid-Natrium. Anaesthesist 32: 18–24, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westaby D, Bihari DJ, Gimson AES, Crossley IR, Williams R. Selective and non-selective beta receptor blockade in the reduction of portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gut 25: 121–124, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westaby D, Melia WM, MacDougall BRD, Hegarty JE, Gimson AE, et al. β-Selective adrenoreceptor blockade for the long term management of variceal bleeding. A prospective randomised trial to compare oral metoprolol with injection schlerotherapy in cirrhosis. Gut 26: 421–425, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead MH, Whitmarsh VB, Horton JN. Metoprolol in anaesthesia for oral surgery. Anaesthesia 35: 779–782, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wichman K, Ryden G, Karlberg BE. A placebo controlled trial of metoprolol in the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 44(Suppl. 169): 90–95, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikstrand J. Cardiovascular function during long-term antihypertensive adrenergic blockade. Symposium on Adrenergic Blood Pressure Regulation, Corfu, May 22–25, 1984, pp. 125–138, 1984

  • Wikstrand J, Trimarco B, Buzzetti G, Ricciardelli B, de Luca N, et al. Increased cardiac output and lowered peripheral resistance during metoprolol treatment. Acta Medica Scandinavica (Suppl. 672): 105–110, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikstrand J, Westergren G, Berglund G, Bracchetti D, Van Couter A, et al. Antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol or hydrochlorothiazide in patients aged 60–75 years. Journal of the American Medical Association, in press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RG, Bennet T, MacDonald IA, Herbert M, Skene AM. The effects of acute or chronic ingestion of propranolol or metoprolol on the physiological responses to prolonged, submaximal exercise in hypertensive men. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17: 273–281, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RG, Hampton JR. Comparative study of atenolol, metoprolol, metoprolol durules, and slow-release oxprenolol in essential hypertension. British Heart Journal 46: 498–502, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winther K, Knudsen JB, Gormsen J, Jensen J. The effect of metoprolol and propranolol on platelet aggregation and cAMP levels in hypertensive patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, in press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Witchitz S, Moisson P, Kolsky H. A comparative trial of ordinary metoprolol tablets and metoprolol sustained-release tablets in hypertensive patients at rest and exercise. Pharmatherapeutica 3: 566–572, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AJJ. β-Blocker withdrawal. Drugs 25(Suppl. 2): 318–321, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods PB, Robinson ML. An investigation of the comparative liposolubilities of β-adrenoceptor blocking agents. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 33: 172–173, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 27: 335–371, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf S, Sleight P, Rossi P, Ramsdale D, Peto R, et al. Reduction in infarct size, arrhythmias and chest pain by early intravenous beta blockade in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 67(Suppl. 1): 32–41, 1983

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: J.L. Anderson, Division of Cardiology, Latter Day Saints Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; W. Bernauer, Department of Pharmacology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, E. Germany; K.J. Broadley, Division of Pharmacology, Welsh School of Pharmacy, University of Wales, Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff, UK; N.M. Kaplan, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; M.S. Lennard, University Department of Therapeutics, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK; D.G. McDevitt, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; R.M. Norris, Coronary Care Unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; G. Olsson, Department of Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden; A.J.J. Wood, Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; S. Yusuf, Clinical Trials Section, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; A. Zanchetti, Centro di Fisiologica Clinica e Ipertensione, Instituto di Clinica Medica IV, Universita di Milano, Milan, Italy.

‘Betaloc’, ‘Beloc’, ‘Seloken’ (Astra); ‘Lopressor’ (Ciba-Geigy); ‘Selopral’ (Hässle); ‘Seloken’ (Bracco, Fujisawa, Searle).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benfield, P., Clissold, S.P. & Brogden, R.N. Metoprolol. Drugs 31, 376–429 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198631050-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198631050-00002

Keywords

Navigation