Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Adverse Effects of Angiographic Radiocontrast Media

  • Review Article
  • Drug Experience
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Radiographic procedures which require the intravascular administration of water-soluble radiocontrast media are performed with increasing frequency. Each examination carries risks that are related either to the technique itself or to the opaque medium chosen. The pathogenesis of radiocontrast media-related adverse effects cannot be explained by a unique theory. The major factors implicated are direct chemotoxic effects and the physicochemical properties of contrast media, the latter being the basis for development of new contrast agents. With non-ionic opaque media cardiovascular adverse effects, heat sensation and local pain are observed less frequently. However, it remains unclear whether the incidence of organ dysfunction or anaphylactic reactions with nonionic contrast media currently used can be reduced. This review compares ionic and nonionic contrast media, and current thoughts on the pathophysiology and treatment of adverse reactions are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams MD, Hopkins RM, Ferrendelli JA. A rat model for evaluating contrast media toxicity. Investigative Radiology 23: S217, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almén T. Contrast agent design: some aspects on the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolarity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 24: 216, 1969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew E, Shaw D, Sveen K, Holager T, Dahlstrom K. Adverse reactions with iohexol in the vascular field: experiences from clinical trials. Investigative Radiology 19: S143, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, G, Tweedie McK, West CR. The current status of reactions to intravenous contrast media. Investigative Radiology 15: S32, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aulie A. Effect of iohexol, metrizamide and ioxoglate on the blood-brain barrier. Acta Radiologica 362: SI3, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettmann MA, Geller SC, McClennan B, et al. Current use of low-osmolality contrast agents —results of a survey. American Journal of Roentgenography 153: 1079–1084, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd L, Sherman RL. Radiocontrast media-induced acute renal failure: a clinical and pathophysiological review. Medicine 58: 270, 1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caillé JM, Allard M. Neurotoxicity of hydrosoluble iodine contrast media. Investigative Radiology 23: S210, 1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr DH, Walker AC. Contrast media reactions: experimental evidence against the allergy theory. British Journal of Radiology 57: 469, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Bashore M. Treatment of reactions to radiographic contrast material. American Journal of Roentgenography 151: 263, 1988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Elia JA, Gleason RD, Alday M. Nephrotoxicity from angiographic contrast material: a prospective study. American Journal of Medicine 72: 719, 1982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes MNG, Ansell G. Radiological contrast media and radiopharmaceuticals. In Dukes (Ed.) Meyler’s side effects of drugs, 9th ed., p. 749, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Endrich B, Ring J, Intaglietta M. Effects of radiopaque contrast media on the microcirculation of the rabbit omentum. Radiology 132: 331, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frink RJ, Merrick B, Lowe HM. Mechanism of the bradycardias during angiocardiography. American Journal of Cardiology 35: 17, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grebe SF, Müller H. Hyperthyreose-Risiko bei Kontrastmittel-verabreichung. In Digitale Radiographie, p. 339, Schnetztor-Verlag, Konstanz, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Grehn S, Steidle B, Seif FJ. Changes in thyroid function following administration of iodinated contrast material in patients from an endemic goiter belt. Radiology 143: 825, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambey RI, Aintablian A, Wisoff BG. Effects of contrast medium on left ventricular pressure and volume with emphasis on coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal 93: 9, 1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley PC, Holmes DR, Julsrud PR, Smith HC. Use of conventional and newer radiographie contrast agents in coronary angiography. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 6: 435, 1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann HG. Nephrotoxizität von ionischen und nicht ionischen Kontrastmitteln -qualitative Bestimmung der Enzymurie. In Zeitler (Ed.) Klinische Pharmakologie der kontrastmittel. Symposion Nürnberg 1985, p.123, Schnetztor Verlag, Konstanz, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey LA, Caldicott WJH. The influence of contrast medium dose on filtration in the rabbit kidney. Investigative Radiology 18: 441, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellige G, Baller D, Hoeft A, Wolpers HG, Zipfel J. The importance of electrolyte shifts and calcium binding on cardiotoxicity of contrast media. In Amiel & Moreau (Eds) Contrast media in radiology: appraisal and prospects, p. 80, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins CB, Schmidt W. Direct and reflex myocardial effects of intracoronary administered contrast materials in the anesthetized and conscious dog: comparison of standard and newer contrast materials. Investigative Radiology 13: 205, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Junck L, Marshall WH. Neurotoxicity of radiological contrast agents. Annals of Neurology 13: 469, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn JK, Rutherford BD, McConahay DR, et al. High-dose contrast agent administration during complex coronary angioplasty. American Heart Journal 120: 533–536, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katzberg RW. Renal effects of contrast media. Investigative Radiology 23: S157, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnison ML, Powe NR, Steinberg EP. Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 170: 381, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke WP, Grace M, Miller R, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Clinical Cardiology 12: 689–696, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klow NE, Refsum H, Hevroy O, et al. Effect of intracoronary contrast medium on left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationships. American Heart Journal 119: 59–63, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lalli AF. Contrast media reactions: data analysis and hypothesis. Radiology 134: 1, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasser EC. Prekallikrein-kallikrein conversion rate as a predictor of contrast material catastrophes. Radiology 140: 11, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasser EC. A coherent biochemical basis for increased reactivity to contrast material in allergic patients: a novel concept. American Journal of Roentgenology 149: 1281, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasser EC, Berry CC, Tulner LB, Santini LC, Lang EK, et al. Protective effects of corticosteroids in contrast material anaphylaxis. Investigative Radiology 23: S193, 1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasser EC, Walters AJ, Lang JH. An experimental basis for histamine release in contrast material reactions. Radiology 125: 49, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds NE. The clinical application of radiopharmaceuticals. Drugs 40: 713–721, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan H, Rapaport SI. Contrast media: quantitative criteria for designing compounds with low toxicity. Acta Radiologica Diagnostica 17: 81, 1976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malette LE, Gomez LS. Systemic hypocalcemia after clinic injections of radiographic contrast media: amelioration by omission of calcium chelating agents. Radiology 148: 677, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Maley P, Olivecrona H, Almén T, Golman K. Interaction between chlorpromazine and intrathecally injected nonionic contrast media in non anaesthetized rabbits. Neuroradiology 26: 235, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandai AK, Lightfoot BO, Treat RC. Mechanisms of protection in acute renal failure. Circulatory Shock 11: 245, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Missri J. Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography: reduced incidence with noniomc contrast media. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 19: 4, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau JF. Nephrotoxicity of uroangiographic contrast media. In Amiel & Moreau (Eds) Contrast media in radiology: appraisal and prospects, pp.195, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau JF, Lesavre P, DeLuca H, Henessen U, Fischer AM, et al. General toxicity of water-soluble iodinated media. Investigative Radiology 23: S75, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morries TW, Ekholm SE, Simon JH, Marinetti GV, Harnish PP,et al. In vitro models for testing the metabolic effects of myelographic contrast media. Investigative Radiology 23: S213, 1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers GE, Bloom FL. Cimetidine (Tagamet) combined with steroids and H1 antihistamines for the prevention of serious radiographic contrast material reactions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 7: 65, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neoh SH. The in vitro activation of complement by radiologic contrast material and its inhibition with aminocaproic acid. Investigative Radiology 16: 152, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer HH. Prevention of radiocontrast media induced nephrotoxicity by calcium channel blocker nitrendipine: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 6: 1030, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, McFarland TM. Ventricular arrythmias during coronary angiography in patients with angina pectoris or chest pain syndromes. American Journal of Cardiology 53: 1496, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peck WW, Slutsky RA, Mancini GBJ, Higgins CB. Combined actions of verapamil and contrast media on atrioventricular conduction. Investigative Radiology 19: 202, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Gomez F, Garcia-Aguado A. Origin of ventricular reflexes caused by coronary angiography. British Heart Journal 39: 967, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ring J, Rothenberger KH. Anaphylaktoide Reaktionen nach Infusionen von Kontrastmitteln. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 126: 657, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberger K, Ring J. Das Wiederholungsrisiko von Kontrastmittelreaktionen bei der Urographie. Fortschritte der Medizin 33: 148, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage MR. Kinetics of watersoluble contrast media in the central nervous system. American Journal of Neuroradiology 141: 815, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherberich J, Tuengerthal S, Kollath J. Monitoring of contrast media toxicity by specific kidney tissue proteinuria of membrane antigens. In Taenzer & Zeitler (Eds) Contrast media in urography, angiography and computerized tomography, p. 37, Georg-Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Schräder R, Schultz H, Wendt TH, Klepzig H, Kober G. Hämodynamische Nebenwirkungen eines ionischen und eines nichtionischen Kontrastmittels bei Patienten mit Vitien und pulmonaler Hypertonie. Zeitschrift für Kardiologie 75: 528, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrott KM, Behrends B, Clauss W, Kaufmann J, Lehnen J. Iohexol in extretory urography: results of the drug monitoring program. Fortschritte der Medizin 104: 153, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Shehadi WH. Contrast media adverse reactions: occurrence, recurrence and distribution patterns. Diagnostic Radiology 143: ll, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Shehadi WH. Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media: A comprehensive study based on a prospective survey. American Journal of Roentgenology 124: 145, 1975

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siefert HM, Press WR, Speck U. Tolerance of iohexol after intracisternal, intracerebral and intraarterial injection in the rat. Acta Radiologica 362: S77, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Slutsky R, Higgins C, Costello D. Mechanism of increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after contrast ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal 106: 107, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sovak M. Introduction to new contrast media. Investigative Radiology 19: S142, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck U. Röntgenkontrastmittel. Ubersicht, Anwendung und pharmazeutische Aspekte, p. 7, Schering, Berlin, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner RM, Greinger RG, Memon N. The effect of contrast media of low osmolality on the peripheral arterial blood flow in dogs. Clinical Radiology 31: 621, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WM, Mills SR, Bates M, Hedlund L, Rommel J. Pulmonary angiography with iopamidol ‘Renografin 76’ in normal and pulmonary hypertensive dogs. Acta Radiologica Diagnostica 24: 425, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Sonnenberg E, Neff CC, Pfister RC. Life-threatening hypotensive reactions to contrast administration: comparison of pharmacologie and fluid therapy. Radiology 162: 15, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker AC, Carr DH. Reactions to radiographic contrast media: an attempt to detect specific anti-contrast antibodies in the sera of reactor patients. British Journal of Radiology 59: 531, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weikl A. Angiokardiographie mit nicht ionischen Kontrastmitteln beim Risikopatienten. In Felex et al. (Eds) Neues im Kontrastbild Herz und grosse Gefässe. Workshop Berlin 1986, p. 15, Schering, Berlin, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Wink K, Hansel I, Amery A, et al. Contrast media in cardiology: comparison of hemodynamic cardiovascular reactions of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium in cardioangiography. Herz/Kreislauf 22: 107–111, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf GL. The fibrillatory prospensities of contrast agents. Investigative Radiology 15: S208, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP. A prospective trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical praxis: comparison of adverse effects. American Journal of Roentgenology 152: 939, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf GL, Gerlings ED, Wilson WJ. Depression of myocardial contractility induced by hypertonic coronary injections in the isolated perfused dog heart. Radiology 107: 655, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf GL, Le Veen RF, Mulrey C. The influence of contrast media additives upon ventricular fibrillation threshold during coronary angiography in ischemic and normal canine hearts. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 4: 145, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpers HG, Bailer D, Hoeft A, Korb H, Schräder R, et al. The effect of ion composition on cellular membrane potentials during selective coronary artériographie. Investigative Radiology 19: 291, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zelis R, Caudill CC, Baggette K, Mason DT. Reflex vasodilation by coronary angiography in human subjects. Circulation 52: 490, 1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Hannover Medical School, Konstanty-Gutschow-Strasse 8, D-3000, Hannover 61, Federal Republic of Germany

    Mechthild Westhoff-Bleck, Jörg S. Bleck & Stefan Jost

Authors
  1. Mechthild Westhoff-Bleck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jörg S. Bleck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Jost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westhoff-Bleck, M., Bleck, J.S. & Jost, S. The Adverse Effects of Angiographic Radiocontrast Media. Drug-Safety 6, 28–36 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199106010-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199106010-00003

Keywords

Search

Navigation