Cent Eur J Public Health 2016, 24(2):163-168 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a4737

Reimbursed Costs of Management of Uterine Cervical Lesions in Poland - a Descriptive Analysis of Data from the National Health Fund and the Ministry of Health

Andrzej Nowakowski1, Andrzej Śliwczyński2, Przemysław Seroczyński3, Marek Cybulski4, Zbigniew Teter2
1 Second Department Oncologic Gynaecology, Saint John of Dukla Regional Cancer Centre, Lublin, Poland
2 Central Office, National Health Fund, Warsaw, Poland
3 ASSECO S.A. Poland, Warsaw, Poland
4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Background: Despite implementation of organised screening programme in 2006/2007, cervical cancer (CC) incidence and mortality in Poland are still higher than the average in the European Union. CC and preceding cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) caused by human papillomaviruses (HPVs) can be prevented by vaccines which are reimbursed in around 20 European countries but not in Poland. CC and CIN can be also detected with the use of HPV tests which are not included in the Polish screening programme. Reimbursement for HPV vaccines and HPV testing requires cost-effectiveness analyses which include country-specific data on the burden and costs of management of cervical neoplasia. Therefore, we investigated the burden of cervical neoplasia and direct costs associated with its detection and management in Poland in 2012 reimbursed by the National Health Fund (NHF) - the only public healthcare insurance institution. We also report administrative costs of the organised screening programme covered by the Ministry of Health.

Methods: Data on the burden and reimbursed costs of organised and opportunistic screening as well as management of cervical neoplasia were drawn from the NHF databases. Numbers of women reported with CIN and CC were ascertained.

Results: In 2012, there were 765,266 and 1,288,358 reimbursed Pap smears collected within and outside the organised screening programme, respectively. Expenditures on medical and administrative procedures in organised screening reached PLN (Polish Zloty) 41,470,664 and 12,150,398 respectively. The number of women with particular diagnosis and reimbursement for the management of these lesions were as follows: glandular ectropion 208,033 and PLN 37,349,515; CIN1 10,521 and PLN 6,616,375; CIN2 5,812 and PLN 5,071,155; CIN3 6,487 and PLN 7,611,062; unspecified grade CIN 36,575 and PLN 12,352,034; and CC 33,482 and PLN 52,377,006, respectively. In women with ectropion and CIN the total number of local excision/ablative therapeutic procedures on the cervix reached 47,658 and the total number of hysterectomies was 1,321.

Conclusion: In 2012, management of approximately 93 thousand women with HPV-related cervical lesions reimbursed in Poland amounted to PLN 84,027,632 which makes it a considerable public health problem. The number of women managed for glandular ectropion is considerable and related costs are high. Total reimbursement for detection, treatment and follow-up of all cervical lesions reaches at least PLN 137 million annually.

Keywords: cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, screening, costs, reimbursement, Poland

Received: March 8, 2015; Revised: May 12, 2016; Accepted: May 12, 2016; Published: June 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nowakowski A, Śliwczyński A, Seroczyński P, Cybulski M, Teter Z. Reimbursed Costs of Management of Uterine Cervical Lesions in Poland - a Descriptive Analysis of Data from the National Health Fund and the Ministry of Health. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016;24(2):163-168. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4737. PubMed PMID: 27178030.
Download citation

References

  1. GLOBOCAN [Internet]. Lyon: IARC; 2016 [cited 2014 Nov 30]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/summary_table_pop_sel.aspx.
  2. Bosch FX, LorinczA, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002 Apr;55(4):244-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Markowitz LE, Tsu V, Deeks SL, Cubie H, Wang SA, Vicari AS, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine introduction - the first five years. Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F139-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Schiller JT, Castellsagué X, Garland SM. A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines. Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F123-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Poljak M, Kocjan BJ. Commercially available assays for multiplex detection of alpha human papillomaviruses. Expert RevAnti Infect Ther. 2010 Oct;8(10):1139-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. EUCAN [Internet]. Lyon: IARC; 2012 [cited 2014 Dec 2]. Available from: http://eco.iarc.fr/eucan/CancerOne.aspx?Cancer=25&Gender=2.
  7. NowakowskiA, Jackowska T, Oszukowski PJ, Radowicki S, Wysocki J, Zatoński W. Prevention of cervical cancer - an interdisciplinary problem. Can we improve the situation in Poland and how? Pediatr Pol. 2013 Jul;88(4):340-6. (In Polish.) Go to original source...
  8. State Sanitary Inspection [Internet]. Warsaw: Chief Sanitary Inspectorate; 2014 [cited 2014 May 5]. Immunization programme for Poland for 2014. Available from: http://www.gis.gov.pl/ckfinder/userfiles/files/EP/informacje%20dla%20podr%C3%B3%C5%BCuj%C4%85cych/PSO%202014.pdf.
  9. Vokó Z, Nagyjánosi L, Kaló Z. Cost-effectiveness of adding vaccination with the AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine to cervical cancer screening in Hungary. BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 30;12:924. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Obradovic M, Mrhar A, Kos M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening programme in Slovenia. Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):415-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Schobert D, RemyV, Schoeffski O. Cost-effectiveness of vaccination with a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Germany using a dynamic transmission model. Health Econ Rev. 2012 Sep 25;2(1):19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Seto K, Marra F, Raymakers A, Marra CA. The cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccines: a systematic review. Drugs. 2012 Mar 26;72(5):715-43. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Nahvijou A, Hadji M, Marnani AB, Tourang F, Bayat N, Weiderpass E, et al.Asystematic review of economic aspects of cervical cancer screen ing strategies worldwide: discrepancy between economic analysis and policymaking. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(19):8229-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ministry of Health [Internet]. Warsaw: Ministry of Health; 2015 [cited 2014 May 5]. Cervical Cancer Prevention Programme in Poland. Available from: http://www.mz.gov.pl/zdrowie-i-profilaktyka/programyzdrowotne/wykaz-programow/narodowy-program-zwalczania-chorobnowotworowych. (In Polish.)
  15. Programme on Fight of Cancer in Poland [Internet]. Warsaw: Sejm of the Republic of Poland; 2013 [cited 2014 May 5].Available from: http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki7ka.nsf/0/F78AF07990BD6AC5C1257B880040846A/%24File/1451.pdf. (In Polish.)
  16. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):107-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Giorgi Rossi P, Ricciardi A, Cohet C, Palazzo F, Furnari G, Valle S, et al. Epidemiology and costs of cervical cancer screening and cervical dysplasia in Italy. BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 25;9:71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Polish National Cancer Registry [Internet]. Warsaw: Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute; 2013 [cited 2014 Nov 22]. Available from: http://onkologia.org.pl. (In Polish.)
  19. Machado Junior LC, Dalmaso AS, Carvalho HB. Evidence for benefits from treating cervical ectopy: literature review. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008 Mar 6;126(2):132-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...