Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 11, 2013

A systematic review of data on biological variation for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transferase

  • Anna Carobene EMAIL logo , Federica Braga , Thomas Roraas , Sverre Sandberg and William A. Bartlett

Abstract

Background: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) are enzymes measured in serum or plasma to investigate liver disease. The aim of this work is to assess the validity of published biological variation (BV) data currently available for these enzymes.

Methods: Publications containing BV data for ALT, AST and GGT were identified by searching PubMed using the following keywords: biological varia*, RCV, CVw, CVi, CVb, and CVg. The 95% confidence intervals for the within- and between-subject coefficients of variation were calculated using the analytical imprecision, the number of subjects, samples and replicates.

Results: The searches identified 10 publications with ALT, 14 with AST and nine with GGT data. The protocols presented in those publications as used were varied. The ranges of within-subject variation reported were: ALT: 11.1%–58.1%, AST: 3.0%–32.3% and for GGT: 3.9%–14.5%. The median values (ALT: 18.0%, AST: 11.9% and GGT: 13.8%) were similar to those listed in a BV database commonly used as a reference source.

Conclusions: Published BV data for ALT, AST and GGT demonstrate a wide range of values derived from inconsistent protocols. The quality of the presentations of the data is variable. These findings raise concerns around the utility of the data currently available and highlight the need for critical appraisal of such publications. The working group on BV of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine is undertaking work to develop a critical appraisal checklist for the production and publication of reliable BV data.


Corresponding author: Anna Carobene, Standardization Laboratory, Diagnostica e Ricerca San Raffaele S.p.A., via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy, Phone: +39 2 26432850, Fax: +39 2 26434178, E-mail:

We thank Ferruccio Ceriotti (Diagnostica e Ricerca San Raffaele, Italy) for supervising the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Fraser CG. Reference change values: the way forward in monitoring. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:264–5.10.1258/acb.2009.009006http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000266289800019&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Cotlove E, Harris EK, Williams GZ. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. 3. Physiological and medical implications. Clin Chem 1970;16:1028–32.10.1093/clinchem/16.12.1028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P. Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications. Clin Chem 1999;45:321–3.10.1093/clinchem/45.3.321Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Fraser CG. Biological variation in clinical chemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:916–23.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59: 491–500.10.1080/00365519950185229Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Ricos C, Garcia-Lario JV, Alvarez V, Cava F, Domenech M, Hernandez A, et al. Biological variation database, and quality specifications for imprecision, bias and total error (desirable and minimum). The 2010 update. Available from: www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. Accessed December, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cooper G, Dejonge N, Ehrmeyer S, Yundt-Pacheco J, Jansen R, Ricos C, et al. Collective opinion paper on finding of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:793–802.10.1515/CCLM.2011.149Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Braga F, Dolci A, Mosca A, Panteghini M. Biological variability of glycated haemoglobin. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:1606–10.10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.030http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000282562200010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Braga F, Panteghini M. Biological variability of C-reactive protein: is the available information reliable? Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1179–83.10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.010http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000305370300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Miller GW, Bruns DE, Hortin GL, Sandberg S, Aakre KM, McQueen MJ, et al. Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion. Clin Chem 2009;55: 24–38.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000262303900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Fraser CG. The nature of biological variation. In: Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington: AACC Press, 2001:1–27.Search in Google Scholar

12. Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409–37.10.3109/10408368909106595Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Carobene A, Graziani MS, Lo Cascio C, Tretti L, Cremonese E, Yabarek T, et al. Age dependence of within-subject biological variation of nine common clinical chemistry analytes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:841–4.10.1515/cclm-2011-0868Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Roraas T, Hyltoft Petersen P, Sandberg S. CIs and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. Clin Chem 2012;58: 1306–13.10.1373/clinchem.2012.187781http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000308570100009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Sebastian-Gambaro MA, Liron-Hernandez FJ, Fuentes-Arderiu X. Intra- and inter-individual biological variability data bank. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1997;35:845–52.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ricos C, Iglesias N, Garcia-Lario JV, Simon M, Cava F, Hernandez A, et al. Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences. Ann Clin Biochem 2007;44:343–52.10.1258/000456307780945633http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000247943400004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Hoelzel WG. Intraindividual variation of some analytes in serum of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 1987;33:57–61.10.1093/clinchem/33.1.57Search in Google Scholar

18. Williams GZ, Young DS, Stein MR, Cotlove E. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. I. Objectives, subject selection, laboratory procedures, and estimation of analytic deviation. Clin Chem 1970;16:1016–21.10.1093/clinchem/16.12.1016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Lacher DA, Hughes JP, Carroll MD. Biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the 1999–2002 national health and nutrition examination survey. Natl Health Stat Report 2010;21:1–7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Dimitri G, Bolner A, Gheller A. Variabilità biologica ed analitica e differenza critica di 21 analiti “comuni”. Biochim Clin 1992;16:401–3.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ricos C, Arumi GE, Rubio E, Schwartz S. Eficacia de un programma interno de control de calidad. Quim Clin 1986;5:159–65.Search in Google Scholar

22. Winkel P, Statland BE, Bokelund H. Factors contributing to intra-individual variation of serum constituents: 5. Short-term day-to-day and within-hour variation of serum constituents in healthy subjects. Clin Chem 1974;20:1520–7.10.1093/clinchem/20.12.1520Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Winkel P, Statland BE, Bokelund H. The effects of time of venipuncture on variation of serum constituents. Am J Clin Pathol 1975;64:433.10.1093/ajcp/64.4.433Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Statland BE, Winkel P, Killingsworth LM. Factors contributing to intra-individual variation of serum constituents: 6. Physiological day-to-day variation in concentrations of 10 specific proteins in sera of healthy subjects. Clin Chem 1976;22:1635–8.10.1093/clinchem/22.10.1635Search in Google Scholar

25. Van Steigterhem AC, Arthur Robertson E, Young DS. Variance components of serum constituents in healthy individuals. Clin Chem 1978;24:212–22.10.1093/clinchem/24.2.212Search in Google Scholar

26. Fraser CG, Williams P. Short-term biological variation of plasma analytes in renal disease. Clin Chem 1983;29:508–10.10.1093/clinchem/29.3.508Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Costongs GM, Janson PC, Bas BM. Short-term and long-term intra-individual variations and critical differences of clinical chemical laboratory parameters. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1985;23:7–16.10.1515/cclm.1985.23.7.405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Hölzel WG. Intra-individual variation of analytes in serum of patients with chronic liver diseases. Clin Chem 1987;33:1133–6.10.1093/clinchem/33.7.1133Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Harris EK, Kanofsky P, Shakarji G, Cotlove E. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. Clin Chem 1970;16:1022–7.10.1093/clinchem/16.12.1022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Young DS, Harris EK, Cotlove E. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. IV. Results of a study designed to eliminate long-term analytic deviations. Clin Chem 1971;17:403–10.10.1093/clinchem/17.5.403Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Winkel P, Statland BE. Correlation of selected serum constituents: consistency of intra-individual correlation values, means and variances during four months. Clin Chem 1976;22:1855–61.10.1093/clinchem/22.11.1855Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Horder M, Bowers GN. Biological variability in aspartate aminotransferase activity in serum of healthy person, and effect of in vitro supplementation with pyridoxal 5-phosphate. Clin Chem 1977;23:551–4.10.1093/clinchem/23.3.551Search in Google Scholar

33. Williams GZ, Widdowson GM, Penton J. Individual character of variation in time-series studies of healthy people II. Differences in values for clinical chemical analytes in serum among demographic groups by age and sex. Clin Chem 1978;24: 313–20.10.1093/clinchem/24.2.313Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Chittò G, Fabi A, Franzini C, Galletta G, Leonardi A, Marelli M, et al. Variabilità biologica intra-individuo: rassegna della letteratura, contributo sperimentale e considerazioni critiche. Biochim Clin 1994;18:673–90.Search in Google Scholar

35. Helander A, Vabo E, Levin K, Borg S. Intra-and interindividual variability of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, γ-glutamyltransferase, and mean corpuscular volume in teetotallers. Clin Chem 1998;44:2120–5.10.1093/clinchem/44.10.2120Search in Google Scholar

36. Pagani F, Panteghini M. Biological variation in serum activities of three hepatic enzymes. Clin Chem 2001;47:355–6.10.1093/clinchem/47.2.355Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Fraser CG. Improved monitoring of differences in serial laboratory results. Clin Chem 2011;57:1635–7.10.1373/clinchem.2011.175026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Fraser CG. Reference change values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:807–12.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000304434200006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar

39. Grossi E, Colombo R, Cavuto S, Franzini C. Age and gender relationships of serum alanine aminotransferase values in healthy subjects. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1675–6.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00627_6.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Férard G, Ferrero CA, Frank PF, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 4. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of alanine aminotransferase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:718–24.10.1515/CCLM.2002.124Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Férard G, Ferrero CA, Frank PF, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 5. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of aspartate aminotransferase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:725–33.10.1515/CCLM.2002.125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Férard G, Ferrero CA, Frank PF, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 6. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of γ-glutamyltransferase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:734–8.Search in Google Scholar

43. Franzini C. Need for a more correct estimate of biological variation values. Biochim Clin 2011;35:382–5.Search in Google Scholar

44. Bartlett WA. Biological variation data: the need for appraisal of the evidence base. In: Renz H, Tauber R, editors. Advances in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Berlin, Boston, Beijing: De Gruyter, 2012:35–7.Search in Google Scholar

45. Available from: http://www.stard-statement.org/. Accessed April, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

46. Available from: http://www.strobe-statement.org/. Accessed April, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

47. Available from: http://efcclm.eu/science/wg-biological-variation. Accessed December, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-02-05
Accepted: 2013-05-16
Published Online: 2013-06-11
Published in Print: 2013-10-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 19.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2013-0096/html
Scroll to top button