Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 12, 2019

Point-of-care ultrasound for peripherally inserted central catheter monitoring: a pilot study

  • Patrick Motz EMAIL logo , Amelie Von Saint Andre Von Arnim , Ramesh S. Iyer , Shilpi Chabra , Maggie Likes and Manjiri Dighe

Abstract

Objective

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in monitoring peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) location in neonates by non-radiologist physicians.

Methods

A prospective cohort study compared PICC localization by ultrasound in neonates with a recent radiograph. The ultrasound exam was performed using a standardized protocol with 13–6 MHz linear and 8–4 MHz phased array transducers by a neonatal-perinatal fellow who was blinded to PICC location on the radiograph.

Results

Of the 30 neonates included, 96.6% (n = 29) were preterm, with 63.3% (n = 19) weighing <1500 g. Nighty-four percent (n = 94) of ultrasound scans matched the radiograph report. The protocol had a sensitivity of 0.97, specificity of 0.66 and positive predictive value of 0.98.

Conclusion

Limited ultrasound exams to monitor PICC position in neonates using a standardized protocol by non-radiologist physicians are feasible and accurate in a single ultrasound user. Further study in multiple providers is needed before widespread use.


Corresponding author: Patrick Motz, DO, MPH, Neonatal-Perinatal Fellow, Department of Neonatology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, Phone: +206-598-0024, Fax:  +(206) 987-2685

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an in-kind contribution of two ultrasound probes by Sonosite.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Ono K, Akahane K, Aota T, Hada M, Takano Y, Kusama T, et al. Neonatal doses from X ray examinations by birth weight in a neonatal intensive care unit. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2003;103:155–62.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006127Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Puch-Kapst K, Juran R, Stoever B, Wauer R. Radiation exposure in 212 very low and extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2009;124:1556–64.10.1542/peds.2008-1028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Jain A, McNamara P, Ng E, El-Khuffash A. The use of targeted neonatal echocardiography to confirm placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Am J Perinatol 2012;29: 101–6.10.1055/s-0031-1295649Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Pulickal AS, Charlagorla PK, Tume SC. Superiority of targeted neonatal echocardiography for umbilical venous catheter tip localization: accuracy of a clinician performance model. J Perinatol 2013;33:950–3.10.1038/jp.2013.96Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Katheria AC, Fleming SE, Kim JH. A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheters compared with standard radiograph in neonates. J Perinatol 2013;33:791–4.10.1038/jp.2013.58Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Telang N, Sharma D, Pratap OT, Kandraju H, Murki S. Use of real-time ultrasound for locating tip position in neonates undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter insertion: a pilot study. Indian J Med Res 2017;145:373–6.Search in Google Scholar

7. Motz P, Arnim A, Likes M, Chabra S, Iyer R, Dighe M, et al. Limited ultrasound protocol for upper extremity peripherally inserted central catheter monitoring: a pilot study in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Ultrasound Med 2019;38:1341–7.10.1002/jum.14816Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Jumani K, Advani S, Reich N, Gosey L, Milstone A. Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter complications in children. JAMA Pediatr 2013;167:429–35.10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.775Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Sneath N. Are supine chest and abdominal radiographs the best way to confirm PICC placement in neonates. Neonatal Netw 2010;29:23–35.10.1891/0730-0832.29.1.23Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Dubbink-Verheij G, Visser R, Tan R, Roest A, Lopriore E, Te Pas A. Inadvertent migration of UVC often leads to malposition. Neonatology 2019;115:205–10.10.1159/000494369Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Simanovsky N, Ofek-Shlomai N, Rozovsky K, Ergaz-Shaltiel Z, Hiller N, Bar-Oz B. Umbilical venous catheter position: evaluation by ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1882–6.10.1007/s00330-011-2129-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Mukerji A, Diambomba Y, Lee SK, Jain A. Use of targeted neonatal echocardiography and focused cardiac sonography in tertiary neonatal intensive care units: time to embrace it? J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:1579–91.10.7863/ultra.15.06037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Vesely TM. Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:527–34.10.1097/01.RVI.0000071097.76348.72Search in Google Scholar

14. Fricke B, Racadio J, Duckworth T, Donnelly L, Tamer R, Johnson N. Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters without fluoroscopy in children: initial catheter tip position. Radiology 2005;234:887–92.10.1148/radiol.2343031823Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2019-0198).


Received: 2019-06-02
Accepted: 2019-09-17
Published Online: 2019-10-12
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2019-0198/html
Scroll to top button