Abstract
Objective: To prospectively ascertain Qatar’s national perinatal mortality rate (PMR) during 2011, compare it with recent data from selected high-income countries, and analyze trends in Qatar’s PMR between 1990 and 2011 using historical data.
Study design: A national prospective cohort study.
Methods: National data on live births, stillbirths, and early neonatal mortality (day 0–6) were collected from all public and private maternity units in Qatar (1st January–December 31st 2011) and compared with historical perinatal mortality data (1990–2010) ascertained from the database of maternity and neonatal units of Women’s Hospital and annual reports of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). For inter-country comparison, country data were extracted from the World Health Statistics published by WHO in 2011 and from the European Perinatal Health Report published by the Europeristat project in 2008.
Results: A total of 20,725 births (20,583 live births plus 142 stillbirths) were recorded during the study period. Qatar’s national PMR during 2011 was 9.55 [early neonatal mortality rate (ENMR) 2.7 and stillbirth rate (SBR) 6.85], which was a significant improvement from a PMR of 13.2 in 1990 [risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.89, P=0.002]. This improvement in PMR was more significant in ENMR (P<0.001) than in SBR (P=0.019). The stillbirths constituted 55% of PMR in 1990, which increased to 71.72% of PMR during 2011. The RR of PMR had a significant downwards trend between 1990 and 2011 (P=0.016). Qatar’s 2011 PMR, SBR, and ENMR are comparable to those of selected high-income counties.
Conclusions: Qatar’s PMR, ENMR, and SBR have significantly improved between 1990 and 2011, and are currently comparable to those of selected high-income countries. An in-depth research to assess the correlates and determinants of stillbirth and perinatal mortality in Qatar is indicated.
The authors stated that there are no confl icts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
We thank the PEARL Study team for their support in data collection, analysis, interpretation, and literature search. We are thankful to Dr Hiba Tohid, a research assistant for the PEARL Study, for her contribution in organizing date tables and graphs and manuscript preparation.
- ☆
The PEARL Study is funded exclusively by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) for a period of 3 years (December 2010–November 2013), through its third cycle of National Priorities Research Programme (NPRP). Grant no. NPRP 09-390-3-097.
The PEARL Study is approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar (protocol no. 9211/09).
References
[1] Annual reports of Hamad Medical Corporation. (Available at http://www.hmc.org.qa.)Search in Google Scholar
[2] Cartlidge PHT, Stewart JH. Effect of changing the stillbirth definition on evaluation of perinatal mortality rates. Lancet. 1995;346:486–488.10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91327-0Search in Google Scholar
[3] Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE). Perinatal mortality 2008: United Kingdom. London: CMACE; 2010. Available at http://www.cmace.org.uk. Accessed 11th June 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Flenady V, Middleon P, Smith GC, Duke W, Erwich JJ, Khong TY, et al. Stillbirths: the way forward in high income countries. Lancet. 2011;377:1703–1717.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60064-0Search in Google Scholar
[5] Froen JF, Cacciatore J, McClure EM, Kuti O, Jokhio AH, Islam M, et al. Stillbirths: Why they matter? Lancet. 2011;377:1353–1366.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62232-5Search in Google Scholar
[6] Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bhutta ZA, Belizán JM, Reddy UM, Rubens CE, et al. Stillbirths: the vision for 2020. Lancet. 2011;377:1798–1805.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62235-0Search in Google Scholar
[7] http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar. Accessed 14th July 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[8] http://www.qnrf.org. Accessed 26th August 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, Cousens S, Kumar R, Ibiebele I, et al. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet. 2011;377:1448–1463.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62187-3Search in Google Scholar
[10] Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5Search in Google Scholar
[11] MacDorman MF, Kirmeyer S. Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2005. Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57:1–19.Search in Google Scholar
[12] O’Dowd MJ, Philipp EE. The history of obstetrics and gynecology. New York, NY: Parthenon Publishing Group; 1994.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Pattinson R, Kerber K, Buchmann E, Friberg IK, Belizan M, Lansky S, et al. Stillbirths: how can health systems deliver for mothers and babies? Lancet. 2011;377:1610–1623.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62306-9Search in Google Scholar
[14] Qatar’s National Health Accounts. First report 2009–2010. Executive summary, pp: 1–3. Available at http://www.who.int/nha/country/qat/qatar-2009-2010-nha_report.pdf. Accessed 26th August 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[15] Qatar Statistics Authority. The Millennium Development Goals in the State of Qatar. 2008. http://www.qsa.gov.qa. Accessed 8th May 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Rahman S, Salameh K, Rifai H, Masoud A, Lutfi S, Salama H, et al. Gestational age specific neonatal survival in the State of Qatar (2003–2008) – A comparative study with international benchmarks. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011;21:542–547.Search in Google Scholar
[17] Rahman S, Salameh K, Bener A, El Ansari W. Socioeconomic associations of improved maternal, neonatal, and perinatal survival in Qatar. Int J Women Health. 2010;2:311–318.10.2147/IJWH.S12426Search in Google Scholar
[18] Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Flaxman AD, Wang H, Levin-Rector A, Dwyer L, et al. Neonatal, postneonatal, childhood, and under-5 mortality for 187 countries, 1970–2010: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 4. Lancet. 2010;375:1988–2008.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60703-9Search in Google Scholar
[19] Salameh, K, Rahman S. Improvements in birth weight specific neonatal mortality rates in the State of Qatar between 2003 and 2010 and a comparative analysis with Vermont Oxford Network (VON) database report 2007: A PEARL Study review. J Clin Neonatol. 2012;1:25–28.10.4103/2249-4847.92242Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] Salameh K, Rahman S, Al Rifai H, Masoud A, Lutfi S, Abdouh G, et al. An analytic study of trends in perinatal and neonatal mortality rates in the State of Qatar over a 30-year period (1977–2007): a comparative study with regional and developed countries. J Perinatol. 2009;29:765–770.10.1038/jp.2009.89Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] The European Perinatal Health Report 2008. Available at http://www.europeristat.com/. Accessed 10th June 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[22] World Health Organization. ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems; instruction manual, Vol. 2. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004:94–98.Search in Google Scholar
[23] World Health Organization. Neonatal and perinatal mortality country, regional and global estimates. 2006. http://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/publications/neonatal.pdf. Accessed 12th May 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[24] World Health Organization. The Millennium Development Goals report 2007. Available at http://www.who.org. Accessed 15th May 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[25] World Health Statistics. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011. Available at http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS2011_Full.pdf. Accessed 10th June 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[26] Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Bréart G, Alexander S, Barros H, Blondel B, et al. Selecting an indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the PERISTAT project. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(Suppl 1):S5–S14.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
