Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 20, 2016

The winner takes it all? Characteristics of adolescent at-risk/problem gamblers in Switzerland

  • Susanne Lehmann , Christina Akré , André Berchtold , Aline Flatz and Joan-Carles Suris EMAIL logo

Abstract

Background:

Gambling has and still entertains people in almost all societies throughout the world. Western societies have faced considerable changes in the amount and accessibility of gambling possibilities during the last decades, and the rates of both adolescent gamblers and problem gamblers have increased significantly.

Objective:

To determine the characteristics of at-risk and problem adolescent gamblers in Switzerland.

Subjects:

The study population consisted of 3134 students (1669 females) attending post-mandatory education in 15 randomly chosen centres. Participants were divided into non- (n=2207), non-problematic (n=754) and at-risk/ problematic gamblers (n=176).

Methods:

Both gambling groups were compared to non-gamblers on socio-demographic measures, substance use and Internet use. Overall, 29.6% had gambled during the past year and 5.6% had gambled in a risky or problematic way. Compared to non-gamblers and after controlling for potential confounders, non-problem gamblers were significantly more likely to be male, apprentices and to misuse alcohol. At-risk/problematic gamblers were additionally more likely to smoke cannabis, to be problematic Internet users and to be non-Swiss than non-gamblers.

Conclusion:

At-risk and problematic adolescent gambling is associated with other health risk behaviours. Health practitioners should include gambling in the psycho-social screening and preventive counselling of adolescents.


Corresponding author: Joan-Carles Suris, Research Group on Adolescent Health, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland, Phone: +41 21 314 73 75, Fax: +41 21 314 7373, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mandate Intercantonal Programme, Gambling Prevention of Northwest and Central Switzerland (AG, BE, BL, BS, LU, NW, OW, SO, UR, ZG), represented by “Addiction Switzerland”.

References

1. Künzi K, Fritschi T, Egger T. Gambling and gambling addiction in Switzerland. Büro für Arbeits- und Sozialpolitische Studien Bern, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

2. Jacobs D. Juvenile gambling in North America: an analysis of long term trends and future prospects. J Gambl Stud 2000;16:119–52.10.1023/A:1009476829902Search in Google Scholar

3. Adams PJ, Raeburn J, de Silva K. A question of balance: prioritizing public health responses to harm from gambling. Addiction 2009;104:688–91.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02414.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Messerlian C, Derevensky J, Gupta R. Youth gambling problems: a public health perspective. Health Promot Int 2005;20:69–79.10.1093/heapro/dah509Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Derevensky JL, Gupta. R, Della Cioppa G. A developmental perspective of gambling behavior in children in adolescents. J Gambl Stud 1996;12:49–66.10.1007/BF01533189Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Messerlian C, Gillespie M, Derevensky JL. Beyond drugs and alcohol: including gambling in a high-risk behavioural framework. Paediatr Child Health 2007;12:199–204.10.1093/pch/12.3.199Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. American Psychiatric Association APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

8. Raylu N, Oei TP. Role of culture in gambling and problem gambling. Clin Psychol Rev 2004;23:1087–114.10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Toce-Gerstein M, Gerstein DR, Volberg RA. A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction 2002;98:1661–72.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00545.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Shaffer HJ, Hall MN. Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: a quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. J Gambl Stud 1996;12:193–214.10.1007/BF01539174Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Delfabbro PH, Winefield AH. Community gambling patterns and the prevalence of gambling-related problems in South Australia (with particular reference to gaming machines). Department of Family and Community Services, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

12. Griffiths M, Wood RTA. Risk Factors in adolescence: the case of Gambling, videogame playing, and the internet. J Gambl Stud 2000;16:199–225.10.1023/A:1009433014881Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Derevensky J, Gupta R, editors. Gambling Problems in Youth. The theoretical and applied perspectives. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

14. Weinstock J, Whelan JP, Meyers AW, Watson JM. Gambling behavior of student-athletes and a student cohort: what are the odds? J Gambl Stud 2007;23:13–24.10.1007/s10899-006-9043-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Johansson A, Grant JE, Won Kim S, Odlaug BL, Götestam KG. Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:67–92.10.1007/s10899-008-9088-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Vitaro F, Brendgen M, Ladouceur R, Tremblay RE. Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence. mutual influences and common risk factors. J Gambl Stud 2001;17:171–90.10.1023/A:1012201221601Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Yip SW, Desai RA, Steinberg MA, Rugle L, Cavallo DA, et al. Health/functioning characteristics, gambling behaviors, and gambling-related motivations in adolescents stratified by gambling problem severity: findings from a high school survey. Am J Addict 2011;20:495–508.10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00180.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Gupta R, Derevensky J. Adolescent gambling behavior: a prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. J Gambl Stud 1998;14:319–45.10.1023/A:1023068925328Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Fulkerson J. Toward the development of an adolescent problem severity scale. J Gambl Stud 1993;9:63–84.10.1007/BF01019925Search in Google Scholar

20. Guilamo-Ramos V, Litardo HA, Jaccard J. Prevention programs for reducing adolescent problem behaviors: implications of the co-occurrence of problem behaviors in adolescnece. J Adolescent Health 2005;36:82–6.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.12.013Search in Google Scholar

21. Jessor R, Jessor SL. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: a longitudinal study of youth. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

22. Barnes GM, Welte JW, Hoffman JH, Dintcheff BA. Gambling and alcohol use among youth: influences of demographic, socialization, and individual factors. Addict Behav 1999;24:749–67.10.1016/S0306-4603(99)00048-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Vitaro F, Wanner B, Carbonneau R, Tremblay RE. La pratique des jeux de hasard et d’argent, les cmportements délinquants et la consommation problématique de substances psychotropes: une perspective développementale. Criminologie 2007;40:59–77.10.7202/016015arSearch in Google Scholar

24. Suris JC, Flatz A, Akré C, Berchtold A. La problématique des jeux d’argent chez les adolescents du canton de Berne. Lausanne: Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive, 2012 (Raisons de santé, 202). 2012.Search in Google Scholar

25. Hibell B, Andersson B, Bjarnason T, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, et al. ESPAD Report 2003. Alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN) 2004. 2003.Search in Google Scholar

26. Narring F, Tschumper A, Inderwildi Bonivento L, Jeannin A, Addor V, et al. Santé et styles de vie des adolescents agés de 16 à 20 ans en Suisse (2002). Lausanne: Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive. 2004.Search in Google Scholar

27. Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004;11:703–6.10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, et al. French validation of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:703–6.10.1089/cpb.2007.0249Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2002.10.1002/0471249688Search in Google Scholar

30. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc 1995;90:773–95.10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572Search in Google Scholar

31. Tozzi L, Akre C, Fleury-Schubert A, Suris JC. Gambling among youths in Switzerland and its association with other addictive behaviours. A population-based study. Swiss medical weekly. 2013;143:w13768.10.4414/smw.2013.13768Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Barnes GM, Welte JW, Hoffman JH, Dintcheff BA. Gambling, alcohol, and other substance use among youth in the United States. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2009;70:134–42.10.15288/jsad.2009.70.134Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Haisley E, Mostafa R, Loewenstein G. Subjective relative income and lottery ticket purchases. J Behav Decis Making 2008;21:283–95.10.1002/bdm.588Search in Google Scholar

34. Burnett J, Ong B, Fuller A. Correlates of gambling in adolescents. In: McMillen J, Laker, L, editors. Developing Strategic Alliances: proceedings of the 9th National Association for Gambling Studies Conference, 1999:216–34.Search in Google Scholar

35. Stinchfield R, Winters KC. Gambling and problem gambling among youths. Ann Am Acad Polit S S 1998;556:172–85.10.1177/0002716298556001013Search in Google Scholar

36. Tavares H, Martins SS, Lobo DSS, Silveira CM, Gentil V, et al. Factors at play in faster progression for female pathological gamblers: an exploratory analysis. J Clin Psychiat 2003;64:433–8.10.4088/JCP.v64n0413Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Ferris J, Wynne H, Single E. Measuring problem gambling in Canada. Final report-Phase I. The Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

38. Kandel DB, Yamaguchi K. Stages of drug involvement in the U.S. population. In: Kandel DB, editor. Stages and pathways of drug involvement: examining the gateway hypothesis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002:65–89.10.1017/CBO9780511499777.006Search in Google Scholar

39. Spritzer DT, Rohde LA, Benzano DB, Laranjeira RR, Pinsky I, et al. Prevalence and correlates of gambling problems among a nationally representative sample of Brazilian adolescents. J Gambl Stud 2011;27:649–61.10.1007/s10899-010-9236-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Goldstein AL, Walton MA, Cunningham RM, Resko SM, Duan L. Correlates of gambling among youth in an inner-city emergency department. Psychol Addict Behav 2009;23:113–21.10.1037/a0013912Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Gupta R, Derevensky JL. Adolescents with gambling problems: from research to treatment. J Gambl Stud 2000;16:315–42.10.1023/A:1009493200768Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-10-8
Accepted: 2015-11-19
Published Online: 2016-1-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2015-0100/html
Scroll to top button