Abstract
Purpose: The aim of our study was to measure the inter-assay variation and accuracy of serum creatinine assays and to assess the effect of standardized calibration procedures on this variability. Methods: We analyzed 30 human sera and three reference materials, using 17 creatinine assays (12 colorimetric, 4 enzymatic and 1 HPLC). We compared two standardized calibration procedures, using either a reference material or secondary standards, to that recommended by the manufacturers. Results: For assays calibrated according to the manufacturers' recommendations, the median inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 14.2% for 20 low samples (45–150μM), and 7.7% for 10 high samples (250–350μM). The CV was significantly influenced by the calibration procedure, but none of the standardized calibration procedures significantly improved the inter-assay variability. However, a significant decrease in CV was noted within each type of assay method (colorimetric or enzymatic) when the standardized calibration used standards of level(s) close to the concentrations to be measured. Only the compensated Jaffe technique and the amido-hydrolase assay showed bias of less than 10%. Conclusions: Standardizing calibration procedures is unlikely to decrease the analytical variability of creatinine assays enough to allow uniform and reliable use of the equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate.
References
1. Cockcroft D, Gault M. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16:31–41.10.1159/000180580Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:461–70.10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Wright JG, Boddy AV, Highley M, Fenwick J, McGill A, Calvert AH. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2001; 84:452–9.10.1054/bjoc.2000.1643Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Verhave JC, Balje-Volkers CP, Hillege HL, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. The reliability of different formulae to predict creatinine clearance. J Intern Med 2003; 253:563–73.10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01141.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr, Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 1976; 58:259–63.10.1542/peds.58.2.259Search in Google Scholar
6. Leger F, Bouissou F, Coulais Y, Tafani M, Chatelut E. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2002; 17:903–7.10.1007/s00467-002-0964-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Carobene A, Ferrero C, Ceriotti F, Modenese A, Besozzi M, de Giorgi E, et al. Creatinine measurement proficiency testing: assignment of matrix-adjusted ID GC-MS target values. Clin Chem 1997; 43:1342–7.10.1093/clinchem/43.8.1342Search in Google Scholar
8. Delanghe J. Standardization of creatinine determination and its consequences for the clinician. Acta Clin Belg 2002; 57:172–5.10.1179/acb.2002.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Hanser AM, Hym B, Michotey O, Gascht D, Marchal A, Minery M, et al. [Comparison of methods for the determination of blood creatinine]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2001; 59:737–42.Search in Google Scholar
10. Jaudon T, Seronie-Vivien S, Chatelut E, Chanut C, Favre G. [Comparison of the modified Jaffe method and an enzymatic method for the measurement of serum creatinine: practical consequences of a method change in the milieu of laboratory of oncologic clinical biology]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2000; 58:499–504.Search in Google Scholar
11. Lawson N, Lang T, Broughton A, Prinsloo P, Turner C, Marenah C. Creatinine assays: time for action? Ann Clin Biochem 2002; 39:599–602.10.1177/000456320203900609Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Vassault A, Cherruau B, Labbe D, Alabrune B, Baltassat P, Bonete R, et al. [Serum creatinine assay: results of a multicentre study with 16 analytical systems]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 1992; 50:81–95.Search in Google Scholar
13. Couchoud C, Pozet N, Labeeuw M, Pouteil-Noble C. Screening early renal failure: cut-off values for serum creatinine as an indicator of renal impairment. Kidney Int 1999; 55:1878–84.10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00411.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Labbe D, Vassault A, Cherruau B, Baltassat P, Bonete R, Carroger G, et al. [Method selected for the determination of creatinine in plasma or serum. Choice of optimal conditions of measurement]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 1996; 54:285–98.Search in Google Scholar
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346:1085–7.10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9Search in Google Scholar
16. Schneider V, Henschel V, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Mansmann U, Haefeli WE. Impact of serum creatinine measurement error on dose adjustment in renal failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 74:458–67.10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00235-2Search in Google Scholar
17. Blijenberg BG, Brouwer RJ, Baadenhuijsen H, Boerma GJ. Creatinine and surveys: an assessment. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33:855–8.10.1515/cclm.1995.33.11.855Search in Google Scholar
18. Ross JW, Miller WG, Myers GL, Praestgaard J. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 122:587–608.Search in Google Scholar
19. Coresh J, Astor BC, McQuillan G, Kusek J, Greene T, Van Lente F, et al. Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39:920–9.10.1053/ajkd.2002.32765Search in Google Scholar
20. Leger F, Seronie-Vivien S, Makdessi J, Lochon I, Delord JP, Sarda C, et al. Impact of the biochemical assay for serum creatinine measurement on the individual carboplatin dosing: a prospective study. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38:52–6.10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00358-6Search in Google Scholar
21. Ando M, Minami H, Ando Y, Saka H, Sakai S, Yamamoto M, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of carboplatin dosing formula using adjusted serum creatinine level. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:4733–8.Search in Google Scholar
22. Wuyts B, Bernard D, Van den NN, Van de WJ, Van Vlem B, De Smet R, et al. Reevaluation of formulas for predicting creatinine clearance in adults and children, using compensated creatinine methods. Clin Chem 2003; 49:1011–4.10.1373/49.6.1011Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Junge W, Wilke B, Halabi A, Klein G. Determination of reference intervals for serum creatinine, creatinine excretion and creatinine clearance with an enzymatic and a modified Jaffe method. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 344:137–48.10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39:1–246.Search in Google Scholar
25. ANAES. Diagnostic de l'insuffisance rénale chez l'adulte: recommandations pour la pratique clinique, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
